Descartes`s Meditations contain three proofs of God`s existence. They have been considered to be different in nature, called respectively as ‘a posteriori proof’ (or demonstration through causality) and as ‘a priori’ (or demonstration through ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102420597
2014
Korean
관념의 실정성 ; 신의 관념 ; 의식 ; 인과성 ; 작용인 ; 표상적 실재성 ; 형상적 실재성 ; Consciousness ; Efficient Cause ; Formal Reality ; Idea of God ; Objective Reality ; Positivity of Ideas ; Principles of Causality
100
KCI등재
학술저널
65-94(30쪽)
3
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Descartes`s Meditations contain three proofs of God`s existence. They have been considered to be different in nature, called respectively as ‘a posteriori proof’ (or demonstration through causality) and as ‘a priori’ (or demonstration through ...
Descartes`s Meditations contain three proofs of God`s existence. They have been considered to be different in nature, called respectively as ‘a posteriori proof’ (or demonstration through causality) and as ‘a priori’ (or demonstration through essence), and associated, at least in their form, with the proof of St. Thomas and with that of St. Aselm. Putting emphasis on the fact that ‘the idea of God’ serves as the common point of departure for each of the three proofs, I argue, first, the nervus probandi of all three demonstrations are the same: each of them is proven from God`s essence and at the same time via causality. Why then has this unity of the three proofs been received so little attention? I show, secondly, that this is due to the tenacious neglect of Descartes`s new conception of ideas, namely the ontological positivity and the activity of ideas. Does this mean that the three proofs of Meditations can be reduced into one of them? I answer in the negative and argue finally that despite this unity each proof has its own function, irreducible one to another, which can be explained by the various aspects of the activity of ideas, as are deployed according to the ‘order,’ imposed by the analytic method of Mediations.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김상환, "현명한 관념론과 우둔한 관념론 : 데카르트의 표상적실재성 분석에 덧붙이는 소고" 6 : 53-91, 1992
2 DESCARTES, René, "철학의 원리" 아카넷 2002
3 김은주, "외적 충격으로부터 어떻게 내면이 구축되는가? -데카르트의 물체 충돌 규칙과 스피노자의 변용(affectio) 개념-" 철학사상연구소 (49) : 53-83, 2013
4 진태원, "스피노자의 자기원인 개념" 철학사상연구소 (22) : 141-172, 2006
5 백종현, "순수이성비판 2" 아카넷 2006
6 DESCARTES, René, "성찰⋅자연의 빛에 의한 진리탐구⋅프로그램에 대한 주석" 문예 출판사 1997
7 김은주, "사유의 역학-스피노자와 프로이트" 한국사회와철학연구회 (21) : 327-362, 2011
8 DESCARTES, René, "방법서설⋅정신지도를 위한 규칙들" 문예 출판사 1997
9 ASELM, "모놀로기온⋅프로슬로기온" 아카넷 2012
10 KENNY, Anthony, "데카르트의 철학" 서광사 1991
1 김상환, "현명한 관념론과 우둔한 관념론 : 데카르트의 표상적실재성 분석에 덧붙이는 소고" 6 : 53-91, 1992
2 DESCARTES, René, "철학의 원리" 아카넷 2002
3 김은주, "외적 충격으로부터 어떻게 내면이 구축되는가? -데카르트의 물체 충돌 규칙과 스피노자의 변용(affectio) 개념-" 철학사상연구소 (49) : 53-83, 2013
4 진태원, "스피노자의 자기원인 개념" 철학사상연구소 (22) : 141-172, 2006
5 백종현, "순수이성비판 2" 아카넷 2006
6 DESCARTES, René, "성찰⋅자연의 빛에 의한 진리탐구⋅프로그램에 대한 주석" 문예 출판사 1997
7 김은주, "사유의 역학-스피노자와 프로이트" 한국사회와철학연구회 (21) : 327-362, 2011
8 DESCARTES, René, "방법서설⋅정신지도를 위한 규칙들" 문예 출판사 1997
9 ASELM, "모놀로기온⋅프로슬로기온" 아카넷 2012
10 KENNY, Anthony, "데카르트의 철학" 서광사 1991
11 CHAPPELL Vere, "The Theory of Ideas" 177-198, 1986
12 NOLAN, Lawrence, "The Ontological Argument as an Excercise in Cartesian Theraphy" 35 (35): 521-562, 2005
13 LEFTOW, Brian, "The Cambridge Companion to Anselm" Cambridge University Press 2004
14 MARION, Jean-Luc, "Sur l’ontologie blanche" PUF 1981
15 COURTINE, Jean-François, "Suarez et le système de la métaphysique" PUF 1990
16 SPINOZA, Baruch, "Spinoza Opera, im Auftrag der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften herausgegeben von Carl Gebhardt, vol. I" Carl Winter Verlag 1925
17 AQUIN Thomas, "Somme Théologique, t. I" CERF 2004
18 MARION, Jean-Luc, "Questions cartésiennes. Méthode et métaphysique" PUF 221-258, 1991
19 LEIBNIZ, G. W., "Philosophical Papers and Letters" D. Reidel Publishing Company 1969
20 RODIS-LEWIS, Geneviève, "On the Complementarity of Meditations III and V: From the ‘General Rule’ of Evidence to ‘Certain Science" 271-296, 1986
21 WELLS, Norman J, "Objective Reality of Ideas in Descartes, Caterus, and Suarez" 28 (28): 33-61, 1990
22 DESCARTES, René, "OEuveres philosophiques" Garnier 1983
23 DESCARTES, René, "OEuveres de Desartes" J. Vrin 1996
24 GILSON. Etienne, "Notes pour l’hisoire de la cause efficiente" 29 : 7-31, 1962
25 DESCARTES, René, "Michelle" GF Flammarion 1992
26 DESCARTES, René, "L’entretien avec Burman" PUF 1981
27 OLIVO, Gill, "L’efficience en cause: Suarez, Descartes et la question de la causalité" 91-105, 1997
28 LAPORTE, Jean, "Le rationalisme de Descartes" PUF 1945
29 BEYSSADE, Jean-Marie, "La philosophie première de Descartes" Flammorion 1979
30 GOUHIER, Henri, "La Pensée métaphysique de Descartes" Vrin 1962
31 O’NEILL, E, "Influxus Physicus" 27-55, 1993
32 GILSON. Etienne, "Etudes sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien" Vrin 225-223, 1951
33 ROTY, Amélie Oksenberg, "Essays on Descartes’ Meditaions" University of California Press 1986
34 GUEROULT, Martial, "Descartes selon l’ordre des raisons, I, L’âme et Dieu" Aubier 1968
35 BIARD, J., "Descartes et le moyen âge" Vrin 1997
36 NADLER, Steven, "Causation in early Modern philosophy, Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony" Pennsylvania State University Press 1993
37 LEFTOW, Brian, "Anselm’s Perfect-Being Theology" 132-156, 2004
38 CURLEY, Edwin, "Analysis in the Meditations: The Quest for Clear and Distinct Ideas" 153-176, 1986
39 GILSON. Etienne, "Actes du XIIe Congrès international dep hilosophie" Sansoni Editore 121-130, 1960
40 DESCARTES, René, "<성찰>에 대한 학자들의 반론과 데카르트의 답변" 나남 2013
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2001-07-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 1999-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.46 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.45 | 0.53 | 1.168 | 0.13 |