RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    싱가포르조정협약에 따른 조정상 합의와 민사집행법상의 집행력

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109293053

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Singapore Mediation Convention was enacted to ensure the enforcement of mediation agreements reached between parties in international commercial disputes. The Convention stipulates that mediation agreements must be in writing and that the mediator must be a neutral third party. If the requirements of the Convention are met, the mediation agreement is legally binding and provides that the courts of each country can recognize the enforceability of the mediation agreement.
    This paper examines only the issue of granting enforcement power to agreements reached through mediation under the agreement, and it should be noted in advance that the scope of the examination is not expanded to include agreements reached through mediation procedures that are generally utilized.
    Finally, I have examined in detail the method of introducing legal provisions that I am thinking of in relation to granting enforcement power (execution power). This is a plan to add a new item 6 to Article 56 of the Civil Execution Act to add ‘execution power recognized by treaty’ as a type of enforcement power. At this time, in order to clarify the eligibility of the enforcement power, a provision is newly established in the proviso clause with the content “only in cases where the court permits it through an enforcement decision upon the application of the parties.”
    In addition, with regard to the opinion that the introduction of a unified mediation procedure law is urgent, first of all, when considering that mediation is a dispute resolution method that replaces litigation, that is, an autonomous dispute resolution based on the free will of the parties, attempting to regulate too many contents with the mediation procedure law is putting the cart before the horse and is not in line with the essence of mediation as an autonomous dispute resolution, and it is unreasonable as it brings an extra-legal mediation procedure into the framework of the bill. In conclusion, if the agreement on mediation according to the agreement is stipulated as a type of enforcement authority under the Civil Execution Act, the problem of granting enforcement power will be resolved simply and clearly.
    번역하기

    The Singapore Mediation Convention was enacted to ensure the enforcement of mediation agreements reached between parties in international commercial disputes. The Convention stipulates that mediation agreements must be in writing and that the mediator...

    The Singapore Mediation Convention was enacted to ensure the enforcement of mediation agreements reached between parties in international commercial disputes. The Convention stipulates that mediation agreements must be in writing and that the mediator must be a neutral third party. If the requirements of the Convention are met, the mediation agreement is legally binding and provides that the courts of each country can recognize the enforceability of the mediation agreement.
    This paper examines only the issue of granting enforcement power to agreements reached through mediation under the agreement, and it should be noted in advance that the scope of the examination is not expanded to include agreements reached through mediation procedures that are generally utilized.
    Finally, I have examined in detail the method of introducing legal provisions that I am thinking of in relation to granting enforcement power (execution power). This is a plan to add a new item 6 to Article 56 of the Civil Execution Act to add ‘execution power recognized by treaty’ as a type of enforcement power. At this time, in order to clarify the eligibility of the enforcement power, a provision is newly established in the proviso clause with the content “only in cases where the court permits it through an enforcement decision upon the application of the parties.”
    In addition, with regard to the opinion that the introduction of a unified mediation procedure law is urgent, first of all, when considering that mediation is a dispute resolution method that replaces litigation, that is, an autonomous dispute resolution based on the free will of the parties, attempting to regulate too many contents with the mediation procedure law is putting the cart before the horse and is not in line with the essence of mediation as an autonomous dispute resolution, and it is unreasonable as it brings an extra-legal mediation procedure into the framework of the bill. In conclusion, if the agreement on mediation according to the agreement is stipulated as a type of enforcement authority under the Civil Execution Act, the problem of granting enforcement power will be resolved simply and clearly.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼