RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their PTR : for KOSPI and KOSDAQ common stocks, simulated stock investment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14066559

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It is widely understood that the Research and development (R&D) is an investment activity. And the output is an intangible asset that should be reflected in the observed market value of the firm. Bosworth, D. and Rogers, M suggested in their work that R&D and patent activity are positively and significantly associated with market value. Also, K.-C. Chang et al. (2012) showed patents are widely adopted in research concerning relationship between patent counts and corporation performance.
    In research regarding the relationship between patent performance and corporation performances, many scholars have confirmed the positive relation between patent citations and market value of firm. We suggest one another indicator PTR, which evaluates the firm's technology value. The technology value includes firm's patented R&D output and patents the firm possessed by purchase. Accordingly, low PTR means that the value of firm's R&D activity is not fully reflected in security prices and investing portfolios with low PTR stocks will result in high investment performance. In the simulation of long term investment, there was a size effect.
    The findings of this study confirmed the PTR portfolios outperform the PER portfolios. Therefore managers should consider PTR and technology value when they make investment decisions. Especially, firms between market value of 50 to 100 billion KRW should consider PTR. Due to the size effect, considering technology value is more proper for those firms.
    번역하기

    It is widely understood that the Research and development (R&D) is an investment activity. And the output is an intangible asset that should be reflected in the observed market value of the firm. Bosworth, D. and Rogers, M suggested in their work ...

    It is widely understood that the Research and development (R&D) is an investment activity. And the output is an intangible asset that should be reflected in the observed market value of the firm. Bosworth, D. and Rogers, M suggested in their work that R&D and patent activity are positively and significantly associated with market value. Also, K.-C. Chang et al. (2012) showed patents are widely adopted in research concerning relationship between patent counts and corporation performance.
    In research regarding the relationship between patent performance and corporation performances, many scholars have confirmed the positive relation between patent citations and market value of firm. We suggest one another indicator PTR, which evaluates the firm's technology value. The technology value includes firm's patented R&D output and patents the firm possessed by purchase. Accordingly, low PTR means that the value of firm's R&D activity is not fully reflected in security prices and investing portfolios with low PTR stocks will result in high investment performance. In the simulation of long term investment, there was a size effect.
    The findings of this study confirmed the PTR portfolios outperform the PER portfolios. Therefore managers should consider PTR and technology value when they make investment decisions. Especially, firms between market value of 50 to 100 billion KRW should consider PTR. Due to the size effect, considering technology value is more proper for those firms.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. Introduction 4
    • 2. Literature Review 7
    • 3. Data and Methodology 13
    • 1. Introduction 4
    • 2. Literature Review 7
    • 3. Data and Methodology 13
    • 3.1 Data base and sample selection criteria 14
    • 3.2 Method of analysis 15
    • 4. Results 17
    • 4.1 Results of simulation comparing PER and PTR 17
    • 4.2 Results of simulation of PTR considering size effect 26
    • 4.3 Comparing invest performance of KOSPI, KOSDAQ BM and PTR 32
    • 5. Conclusion 34
    • References 37
    • 국문 초록 40
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼