RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    SCOPUS KCI등재

    의사와 환자 간 공유된 진료의사결정이 환자만족도에 미치는 영향 = Impact of Shared-Decision Making on Patient Satisfaction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101438019

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Objectives: The purpose of this research is to analyze the impact of shared-decision making on patient satisfaction. The study is significant since it focuses on developing appropriate methodologies and analyzing data to identify patient preferences, with the goals of optimizing treatment selection, and substantiating the relationship between such preferences and their impact on outcomes. Methods: A thorough literature review that developed the framework illustrating key dimensions of shared decision making was followed by a quantitative assessment and regression analysis of patient-perceived satisfaction, and the degree of shared-decision making. Results: A positive association was evident between shared-decision making and patient satisfaction. The impact of shared decision making on patient satisfaction was greater than other variable including gender, education, and number of visits. Conclusions: Patients who participate in care-related decisions and who are given an explanation of their health problems are more likely to be satisfied with their care. It would benefit health care organizations to train their medical professionals in this communication method, and to include it in their practice guidelines.
    번역하기

    Objectives: The purpose of this research is to analyze the impact of shared-decision making on patient satisfaction. The study is significant since it focuses on developing appropriate methodologies and analyzing data to identify patient preferences, ...

    Objectives: The purpose of this research is to analyze the impact of shared-decision making on patient satisfaction. The study is significant since it focuses on developing appropriate methodologies and analyzing data to identify patient preferences, with the goals of optimizing treatment selection, and substantiating the relationship between such preferences and their impact on outcomes. Methods: A thorough literature review that developed the framework illustrating key dimensions of shared decision making was followed by a quantitative assessment and regression analysis of patient-perceived satisfaction, and the degree of shared-decision making. Results: A positive association was evident between shared-decision making and patient satisfaction. The impact of shared decision making on patient satisfaction was greater than other variable including gender, education, and number of visits. Conclusions: Patients who participate in care-related decisions and who are given an explanation of their health problems are more likely to be satisfied with their care. It would benefit health care organizations to train their medical professionals in this communication method, and to include it in their practice guidelines.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 DiMatteo MR, "The significance of patients’perception conduct: A study of patient satisfaction in a family practice center" 6 (6): 18-34, 1980

    2 Elwyn G, "The OPTION scale: Measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks" 8 (8): 34-42, 2005

    3 Charles C, "Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)" 44 (44): 681-692, 1997

    4 Greenfield S, "Patients’participation in medical care: Effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes" 3 (3): 448-457, 1988

    5 Samsung Economic Research Institute(SERI), "Major Megatrends of Healthcare Industry and their Implication" SERI 2007

    6 Edwards A, "Inside the black box of shared decision making: Distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision" 9 (9): 307-320, 2006

    7 Chosun Ilbo, Patients, "How come they do not communicate’"

    8 Davis RE, "Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation" 6 (6): 198-207, 2003

    9 Greenfield S, "Expanding patient involvement in care: Effects on patient outcomes" 102 (102): 520-528, 1985

    10 Thornton H, "Evolving the multiple roles of‘ patients’in health-care research: Reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making" 6 (6): 189-197, 2003

    1 DiMatteo MR, "The significance of patients’perception conduct: A study of patient satisfaction in a family practice center" 6 (6): 18-34, 1980

    2 Elwyn G, "The OPTION scale: Measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks" 8 (8): 34-42, 2005

    3 Charles C, "Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)" 44 (44): 681-692, 1997

    4 Greenfield S, "Patients’participation in medical care: Effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes" 3 (3): 448-457, 1988

    5 Samsung Economic Research Institute(SERI), "Major Megatrends of Healthcare Industry and their Implication" SERI 2007

    6 Edwards A, "Inside the black box of shared decision making: Distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision" 9 (9): 307-320, 2006

    7 Chosun Ilbo, Patients, "How come they do not communicate’"

    8 Davis RE, "Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation" 6 (6): 198-207, 2003

    9 Greenfield S, "Expanding patient involvement in care: Effects on patient outcomes" 102 (102): 520-528, 1985

    10 Thornton H, "Evolving the multiple roles of‘ patients’in health-care research: Reflections after involvement in a trial of shared decision-making" 6 (6): 189-197, 2003

    11 Donabedian A., "Evaluating the quality of medical care" 4 (4): 166-206, 1966

    12 Swanson KA, "Effect of mental health care and shared decision making on patient satisfaction in a community sample of patients with depression" 64 (64): 416-430, 2007

    13 O’Connor AM, "Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: Systematic review" 319 (319): 731-734, 1999

    14 Institute of Medicine, "Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century" National Academy Press 2001

    15 Anderson R, "Behavioral Model of Families’Use of Health Services" University of Chicago Press 1968

    16 Clayman ML, "Autonomy-related behaviors of patient companions and their effect on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits" 6 (6): 1583-1591, 2005

    17 Kaplan SH, "Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease" 27 (27): S110-S127, 1989

    18 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, "Annual Report of the National CAHPS Benchmarking Database 2000: What Consumers Say about the Quality of Their Health Plans and Medical Care" U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2010-06-28 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine -> Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.3 0.3 0.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.31 0.32 0.784 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼