RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    논항이론과 중국어 동사 논항구조 연구 (2) = Thematic Theory and Thematic Structures of Verbs in Chinese (2)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82387229

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper shows that the thematic theory and unaccusative hypothesis also can be applied to distinguish the two classes of three-place predicates in Chinese. According to the unaccusative hypothesis, intransitive and transitive verbs can be classified into two types, i.e. unaccusative series and unergative series. In this paper we argued that ditransitive verbs also can be divided into two types. The give-type double object construction belongs to the unaccusative series, while the rob-type double object construction belongs to the unergative series. In this point, we can reanalyze the two types of the double object construction of Chinese. The give-type double object construction is analyzed as three-place unaccusative construction with one object and two subjects while the rob-type double object construction is analyzed as true double object construction with one subject.
    번역하기

    This paper shows that the thematic theory and unaccusative hypothesis also can be applied to distinguish the two classes of three-place predicates in Chinese. According to the unaccusative hypothesis, intransitive and transitive verbs can be classifie...

    This paper shows that the thematic theory and unaccusative hypothesis also can be applied to distinguish the two classes of three-place predicates in Chinese. According to the unaccusative hypothesis, intransitive and transitive verbs can be classified into two types, i.e. unaccusative series and unergative series. In this paper we argued that ditransitive verbs also can be divided into two types. The give-type double object construction belongs to the unaccusative series, while the rob-type double object construction belongs to the unergative series. In this point, we can reanalyze the two types of the double object construction of Chinese. The give-type double object construction is analyzed as three-place unaccusative construction with one object and two subjects while the rob-type double object construction is analyzed as true double object construction with one subject.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 4. 두 가지 부류의 이중목적어구조
    • 5. 구조적 차이와 언어의 차이
    • 6. 맺음말
    • 【원저 참고문헌】
    • 【역자 참고문헌】
    • 4. 두 가지 부류의 이중목적어구조
    • 5. 구조적 차이와 언어의 차이
    • 6. 맺음말
    • 【원저 참고문헌】
    • 【역자 참고문헌】
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 溫賓利, "領有名詞移位: 基於MP的分析" (4) : 2001

    2 韓景泉, "領有名詞提昇移位與格理論" (3) : 2000

    3 Radford, Andrew, "최소주의 통사론" 한신문화사 1999

    4 原口庄輔, "촘스키 언어학 사전" 한신문화사 1998

    5 구자혁, "중간동사의 논항구조에 대하여" (14) : 197-214, 1995

    6 박경선, "영어 완료형의 be/have 변이형에 관하여" (19) : 77-95, 2004

    7 김동옥, "변형 생성 문법 개관" 한신문화사 1999

    8 정태구, "논항구조와 영어 통사론" 한국문화사 2002

    9 Grimshaw, "논항구조론" 한국문화사 1999

    10 시정곤, "논항구조란 무엇인가" 월인 2000

    1 溫賓利, "領有名詞移位: 基於MP的分析" (4) : 2001

    2 韓景泉, "領有名詞提昇移位與格理論" (3) : 2000

    3 Radford, Andrew, "최소주의 통사론" 한신문화사 1999

    4 原口庄輔, "촘스키 언어학 사전" 한신문화사 1998

    5 구자혁, "중간동사의 논항구조에 대하여" (14) : 197-214, 1995

    6 박경선, "영어 완료형의 be/have 변이형에 관하여" (19) : 77-95, 2004

    7 김동옥, "변형 생성 문법 개관" 한신문화사 1999

    8 정태구, "논항구조와 영어 통사론" 한국문화사 2002

    9 Grimshaw, "논항구조론" 한국문화사 1999

    10 시정곤, "논항구조란 무엇인가" 월인 2000

    11 Blake, Barry, "격" 한신문화사 1998

    12 顧陽, "雙賓語結構 in 共性與個性: 漢語語言學中的爭論" 北京語言大學出版社 1999

    13 馮勝利, "輕動詞移位與古今漢語的動賓關係" (2) : 2004

    14 朱行帆, "輕動詞和漢語不及物動詞帶賓語現象" (3) : 2005

    15 蔡維天,<談漢語的蒙受結構>, "談漢語的蒙受結構"

    16 呂叔湘, "說“勝”和“敗”" (1) : 1987

    17 潘海華, "虛詞there的句法地位及相關理論問題" (1) : 2006

    18 朱德熙, "與動詞“給”相關的句法問題" (2) : 1979

    19 沈陽, "生成語法理論與漢語語法硏究" 黑龍江敎育出版社 2002

    20 徐德寬, "現代漢語雙賓構造硏究" 上海辭書出版社 2004

    21 張伯江, "現代漢語雙及物結構式" (3) : 1999

    22 馮勝, "漢語韻律句法硏究" 北京大學出版社 2005

    23 張寧, "漢語雙賓語句結構分析 in 面臨新世紀挑戰的現代漢語語法硏究" 山東敎育出版社 2000

    24 鄧思穎, "漢語方言語法的參數理論" 北京大學出版社 2003

    25 黃正德, "漢語動詞的題元結構與其句法表現" (4) : 2007

    26 梅祖麟, "梅祖麟語言學論文集" 商務印書館 2005

    27 徐杰, "普遍語法原則與漢語語法現象" 北京大學出版社 2001

    28 徐杰, "普遍語法原則與漢語語法現象" 北京大學出版社 2001

    29 梅祖麟, "從漢代的“動、殺”、“動、死”來看動補結構的發展" (16) : 1991

    30 湯廷池, "國語語法硏究論集" 臺灣學生書局 1977

    31 張國憲, "制約奪事成分句位實現的語義因素" (6) : 2001

    32 孫晉文, "再論領有名詞提昇移位" (6) : 2003

    33 陸儉明, "再談“吃了他三個蘋果”一類結構的性質" (4) : 2002

    34 徐杰, "兩種保留賓語句式與相關語法理論" (1) : 1999a

    35 鄧思穎, "作格化和漢語被動句" (4) : 2004

    36 黃正德, "他的老師當得好 in 呂叔湘先生百歲誕辰紀念會議論文集" 商務印書館 2005

    37 黃正德, "中文的兩種及物動詞和兩種不及物動詞"

    38 沈家煊, "“王冕死了父親”的生成方式: 兼說漢語“糅合”造句" (4) : 2006

    39 徐杰, "“打碎了他四個杯子”與約束原則" (3) : 1999b

    40 Dowty,David, "Word meaning and montague grammar" Kluwer 1979

    41 Huang,C.-T.James(黃正德), "Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure" 64 : 274-311, 1988

    42 Washio,Ryuichi, "Unaccusativity and East Asian languages: issues and prospects" 253 : 44-91, 2006

    43 Chappell, Hillary, "The double unaccusative construction in Sinitic languages in External possession" John Benjamins 195-228, 1999

    44 Chomsky,Noam, "The Minimalist Program" MIT Press 1995

    45 Sybesma,Rint, "The Mandarin VP" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

    46 Oehrle,Richard T, "The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation" Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1976

    47 Mei,Kuang(梅廣), "Studies in the Transformational Grammar of Modern Standard Chinese" Harvard University 1972

    48 Huang,C.-T.James(黃正德), "Resultatives and unaccusatives: a parametric view" 253 : 44-91, 2006

    49 Rizzi,Luigi, "Relativized Minimality" MIT Press 1990

    50 Harley, Heidi, "Possession and the double object construction"

    51 Harley, Heidi, "Possession and the double object construction"

    52 Li,Y.-H.Audrey(李艶惠), "Order and constituency on Mandarin Chinese" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

    53 Thompson,Sandra A, "On transitivity and the ba construction in Mandarin Chinese" 1973

    54 Larson,Richard, "On the double object construction" 19 : 335-391, 1988

    55 Cheng, Lisa L.-S.(鄭禮珊), "On the argument structure of resultative compounds in honor of William Wang" Pyramid Press 1995

    56 Cheng & Huang, "On the argument structure of resultative compounds in honor of William Wang" Pyramid Press 187-221, 1995

    57 Huang,C.-T.James(黃正德), "On lexical structure and syntactic projection,Chinese languages and Linguistics 3:45-89" (3) : 45-89, 1997

    58 Hale, Kenneth, "On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations in The view from building" MIT Press 53-110, 1993

    59 Yue,Anne(余靄芹), "Mandarin syntactic structures" Princeton University 8 : 1971

    60 Lin,T.-H.Jonah(林宗宏), "Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure" University of California 2001

    61 McCawley,James D, "Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure" 4 : 71-80, 1969

    62 Burzio,Luigi, "Italian syntax" Academic Publishers 1986

    63 Perlmutter,David, "Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis" (4) : 157-189, 1978

    64 Cheng, Lisa L.-S.(鄭禮珊), "Hoo, hoo, hoo: syntax of the causative, dative, and passive constructions in Taiwanese in Contemporary Studies on the Min Dialects" 14 : 146-203, 1999

    65 Hole, Daniel, "Extra argumentality-a binding account of ‘possessor raising’in German, English and Mandarin in Possessives and beyond: Semantics and Syntax" GLSA Publications 365-386, 2005

    66 Hole, Daniel, "Extra Argumentality-a Binding Account of “possessor raising” in German, English And Mandarin in Possessives and beyond: Semantics and Syntax" GLSA Publications 365-386, 2005

    67 Liu,Feng-Hsi(劉鳳樨), "Dative constructions in Chinese" 7 : 863-904, 2006

    68 Sybesma,Rint, "Causatives and Accomplishments: the Case for Chinese ba" Leiden University 1992

    69 Levin, Beth, "Argument realization" Cambridge University Press 2005

    70 Zhang,Niina N.(張寧), "Argument interpretations in the ditransitive construction" 21 : 179-209, 1998

    71 Li,Y.-H.Audrey(李艶惠), "Abstract Case in Chinese" University of Southern California 1985

    72 沈家煊, ""王冕死了父親"的生成方式――兼說漢語糅合造句>,"中國語文"" 2006 (2006): 292-383, 2006

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : 중국어문논역총간 제5집 -> 중국어문논역총간 KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.26 0.26 0.27
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.24 0.22 0.493 0.14
    더보기
    해외이동버튼