RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      ASSESSING THE USABILITY OF A WEB SITE BASED ON AESTHETIC ATTRIBUTES

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10087746

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The study of Human-Computer Interaction, especially that focusing on user interface design of Web sites, has raised the importance of aesthetics. However, neither a clear definition of aesthetics nor a tool for evaluating the aesthetic quality has been presented in previous research.
      This dissertation suggests a relevant perspective on aesthetics, establishes the basis for a definition for aesthetics within HCI, provides an evaluation tool called the Aesthetics Evaluation Tool (AET), and presents the relationships between the aesthetic quality and usability quality of a Web site. Results of an online survey and an on-site experiment are also presented.
      Six primary aesthetic concepts that determine the aesthetic quality of an object were suggested by the famous aesthetician, Dessoir. Three of these concepts were examined in the online survey to confirm that they provide aesthetic pleasure. The results of the online survey showed that the aesthetic quality of a Web site could be understood as a degree of one of the three primary aesthetic concepts-the beautiful, the pretty, and the comic.
      The Aesthetics Evaluation Tool was developed from the analyses of results of an online survey. Adjectives that made people feel aesthetic pleasure in this online survey phase were collected from the results of the online survey, and these adjectives were used to develop the Aesthetics Evaluation Tool.
      Finally, the relationship between the aesthetic quality of a Web site and a user’s performance were examined in an on-site experiment. The experiment results showed that the aesthetic quality of a Web site tends to enhance the dwell time and the time of response. However, results did not show that the aesthetic quality of a Web site enhances all types of user performance
      번역하기

      The study of Human-Computer Interaction, especially that focusing on user interface design of Web sites, has raised the importance of aesthetics. However, neither a clear definition of aesthetics nor a tool for evaluating the aesthetic quality has bee...

      The study of Human-Computer Interaction, especially that focusing on user interface design of Web sites, has raised the importance of aesthetics. However, neither a clear definition of aesthetics nor a tool for evaluating the aesthetic quality has been presented in previous research.
      This dissertation suggests a relevant perspective on aesthetics, establishes the basis for a definition for aesthetics within HCI, provides an evaluation tool called the Aesthetics Evaluation Tool (AET), and presents the relationships between the aesthetic quality and usability quality of a Web site. Results of an online survey and an on-site experiment are also presented.
      Six primary aesthetic concepts that determine the aesthetic quality of an object were suggested by the famous aesthetician, Dessoir. Three of these concepts were examined in the online survey to confirm that they provide aesthetic pleasure. The results of the online survey showed that the aesthetic quality of a Web site could be understood as a degree of one of the three primary aesthetic concepts-the beautiful, the pretty, and the comic.
      The Aesthetics Evaluation Tool was developed from the analyses of results of an online survey. Adjectives that made people feel aesthetic pleasure in this online survey phase were collected from the results of the online survey, and these adjectives were used to develop the Aesthetics Evaluation Tool.
      Finally, the relationship between the aesthetic quality of a Web site and a user’s performance were examined in an on-site experiment. The experiment results showed that the aesthetic quality of a Web site tends to enhance the dwell time and the time of response. However, results did not show that the aesthetic quality of a Web site enhances all types of user performance

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT = iii
      • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT = iv
      • TABLE OF CONTENTS = v
      • LIST OF FIGURES = ix
      • LIST OF TABLES = xi
      • ABSTRACT = iii
      • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT = iv
      • TABLE OF CONTENTS = v
      • LIST OF FIGURES = ix
      • LIST OF TABLES = xi
      • CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION = 1
      • 1.1 Research Background and Motivation = 1
      • 1.1.1 Internet as a Vital Tool of Human Life = 1
      • 1.1.2 Severe Competition among Web Sites = 2
      • 1.1.3 Research on User Interface Design and Aesthetics = 3
      • 1.2 Research Objectives and Hypotheses = 5
      • 1.3 Research Process and Methods = 6
      • 1.3.1 Stage 0: Understanding Aesthetics and Previous Research = 6
      • 1.3.2 Stage 1: Ascertaining the Unique Viewpoint on Aesthetics = 6
      • 1.3.3 Stage 2: Developing an Aesthetics Evaluation Tool = 7
      • 1.3.4 Stage 3: Examining the Role of Aesthetics toward User’s Performance = 7
      • 1.4 Organization of the Dissertation = 7
      • 1.5 Summary = 8
      • CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW = 10
      • 2.1 Aesthetics & Art = 10
      • 2.1.1 Art = 10
      • 2.1.2 Aesthetic Object and Experience = 11
      • 2.1.3 Aesthetic Value - Beauty = 11
      • 2.1.4 Objectivity of Aesthetics = 13
      • 2.1.5 Primary Aesthetic Concepts = 14
      • 2.1.6 Expression Principles = 16
      • 2.1.7 Expression & Perception = 17
      • 2.2 Aesthetics in the Field of HCI = 20
      • 2.2.1 HCI, an Interdisciplinary Research Field = 20
      • 2.2.2 User Interface Design: Definition and Goal = 22
      • 2.2.3 User Interface Design: Design Principles = 23
      • 2.2.4 Emotion and Usability = 24
      • 2.2.5 Aesthetics and Usability = 25
      • 2.2.6 Credibility and Seduction in Captology = 26
      • 2.2.7 Use of a Metaphor in User Interface = 28
      • 2.2.8 Multimedia Taxonomy = 30
      • 2.2.9 Aesthetics of Programming = 31
      • 2.3 Aesthetics in the World Wide Web = 32
      • 2.3.1 Definition of the World Wide Web = 32
      • 2.3.2 Differences between Print Design and Web Design = 33
      • 2.3.3 Special Restrictions of Aesthetics in the WWW = 34
      • 2.3.4 Viewable Browsing Area = 36
      • 2.3.5 Web Design Guideline = 37
      • 2.3.6 Advance of Technologies and Enriched Web Page = 39
      • 2.4 Summary = 40
      • CHAPTER 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY = 42
      • 3.1 Survey of Aesthetics = 43
      • 3.1.1 Original Preparation of the Survey Questionnaire = 44
      • 3.1.2 Original Design of Survey = 47
      • 3.1.3 Pilot Test of the Survey Tool = 49
      • 3.1.4 Analysis of the Survey Results = 50
      • 3.2 Development of an Aesthetics Evaluation Tool = 51
      • 3.2.1 Design of the Aesthetics Evaluation Tool = 51
      • 3.2.2 Expert Review of the Aesthetics Evaluation Tool = 52
      • 3.3 Experiment to Test the Role of Aesthetics toward the Usability = 53
      • 3.3.1 Preparation of Two Web Sites = 53
      • 3.3.2 Design of Experiment = 57
      • 3.4 Summary = 60
      • CHAPTER 4. RESULTS OF THE SURVEY OF AESTHETICS = 61
      • 4.1 Modification of the Survey Plan = 61
      • 4.1.1 Results of the Pilot Test of the Survey Web Site = 61
      • 4.1.2 Modification of the Questionnaire = 62
      • 4.1.3 Modification of the Survey Design = 64
      • 4.2 Similarity of Aesthetic Pleasure among Individuals = 65
      • 4.3 Adjectives that Represent Aesthetic Pleasure = 70
      • 4.4 Expression Principles and Aesthetic Pleasure = 72
      • 4.5 Summary = 78
      • CHAPTER 5. AESTHETICS EVALUATION TOOL = 79
      • 5.1 Elimination and Merging of the Adjectives = 79
      • 5.2 Preparation of Questions from the Adjectives = 81
      • 5.3 Expert Reviews and Modifications of the Aesthetics Evaluation Tool = 82
      • 5.4 Summary = 84
      • CHAPTER 6. RESULTS OF THE EXPERIMENT = 86
      • 6.1 Modifications of the Experiment Plan = 86
      • 6.2 Comparison of the Aesthetic Quality = 88
      • 6.3 Comparison of the Dwell Time = 92
      • 6.4 Comparison of the Completeness of a Task = 95
      • 6.5 Comparison of the Time of Response = 97
      • 6.6 Comparison of the Depth of Response = 100
      • 6.7 Summary = 109
      • CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSIONS = 111
      • 7.1 Contributions = 114
      • 7.2 Future Work = 115
      • 7.2.1 Expanding the Knowledge Base in Various Research Areas in HCI = 115
      • 7.2.2 Extending the Aesthetics Evaluation Tool = 117
      • 7.2.3 Constraints of the Experiment & Conducting Refined Experiments = 117
      • 7.2.4 User’s Characteristics and User’s Performance = 118
      • 7.3 Summary = 118
      • REFERENCES = 119
      • Appendix A. Screen Shots of the Original Survey Site = 125
      • Appendix B. Screen Shots of the Modified Survey Site = 130
      • Appendix C. Frequency Charts on Different Age Ranges = 137
      • Appendix D. List of Answered Adjectives and their Frequencies = 141
      • Appendix E. New Adjectives from Open-Ended Question = 146
      • Appendix F. Frequency Charts for the Expression Principles = 147
      • Appendix G. Aesthetics Evaluation Tool (Before the Expert Review) = 170
      • Appendix H. Aesthetics Evaluation Tool (After the Expert Review) = 175
      • Appendix I. Questionnaire for the Experiment = 180
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼