1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The non-taxation system for 1 house held by 1 household is mentioned as another problem of housing taxation policy, it contains lots of problems such as the tax equity with the owner of other assets, which the...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60105478
2012
-
주택양도소독세 ; 양도소독세중과제도 ; 조세형평성 ; 조세정책 ; 비과세 ; Housing Transfer Income Tax ; Heavy Taxation System ; Tax Equity ; Tax Policy ; tax-free
321
KCI등재
학술저널
195-214(20쪽)
3
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES The non-taxation system for 1 house held by 1 household is mentioned as another problem of housing taxation policy, it contains lots of problems such as the tax equity with the owner of other assets, which the...
1. CONTENTS
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The non-taxation system for 1 house held by 1 household is mentioned as another problem of housing taxation policy, it contains lots of problems such as the tax equity with the owner of other assets, which the transfer income tax is imposed, or with the people, who do not own a house, the complexity of legal system, the transparency of transaction, the taxation void in case of transferring to a specially related person at low price, etc.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
The difference between this study and preceding studies is to listen to the opinions of the tax accountants, the tax specialists, on the two big problems of current housing transfer income tax systems in our country, that is, the serious distortion of tax equity caused by coexisting the income deduction as countermeasure for the problems of non-taxation system of 1 house hold by 1 household and the heavy transfer income tax system for the owners having more than one house and the housing transfer income tax reductionㆍexemption policy, which are conflicting each other, and to compare with the direction of future housing transfer income tax policy, which will be selected by Government in December, 2010 and based on that result, to propose improvement measures for housing transfer income tax system in our country.
(3) RESEARCH FINDINGS
As identified above, since the tax specialists considered that to abolish the housing transfer income tax reductionㆍexemption system was desirable in the moment of abolishing either one of heavy taxation system for owners having more than one house or housing transfer income tax reductionㆍexemption system, and the heavy taxation of transfer income tax for owners having more than one house has many adverse effects, if it is hard to abolish immediately due to being concerned about speculation in real estate, it is recommended that suspension of heavy taxation system can be abolished after maintaining 1 or 2 years more and the flexible tax rate system around 10% should be implemented as alternative measure for the regions of housing speculation.
2. RESULTS
Owners having more than one house heavy taxation system currently in force for the majority of respondents (69.5%) had recognized the need for housing and institutional devices designed to prevent. speculation owners having more than one house during and about the necessity of the system, most respondents(92.2%) were recognized. Also, is currently running a house capital gain tax relief. Exemption system by a three owners having more than one house If you have been with the previous one three owners having more than one house when comparing the majority (72.5%) of respondents undermine tax equity concerns, and solutions such imbalances include tax equity owners having more than one house grace and of Removal of heavy taxation system, and housing capital gain tax relief, relief should be abolished(50.4%) had a lot of the comments.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 이동식, "헌법적 관점에서 바라본 부동산 세제" 세경사 2006
2 이상신, "한국과 미국의 부동산법제에 관한 비교연구(2)" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 358-377, 2010
3 국정홍보처, "투기시대의 종말"
4 장기용, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 중과세제도의 헌법적 한계" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 267-284, 2010
5 박훈, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 비과세 및 감면제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 149-175, 2009
6 노영훈, "주택에 관한 양도소득세제 개편연구" 한국조세연구원 2006
7 김형준, "주택과 양도소득세(1세대1주택비과세 특례를 중심으로)" 주택금융공사 (69) : 2010
8 임언선, "주택거래 정상화관련 쟁점(양도소득세제를 중심으로)" 국회입법조사처 2010
9 김세희, "조세법개론" 송원대학출판부 2010
10 유재선, "자본이득세제에 관한 연구 : 비사업자의 부동산 양도소득 과세에 대한 입법론을 중심으로" 강남대학교 대학원 2009
1 이동식, "헌법적 관점에서 바라본 부동산 세제" 세경사 2006
2 이상신, "한국과 미국의 부동산법제에 관한 비교연구(2)" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 358-377, 2010
3 국정홍보처, "투기시대의 종말"
4 장기용, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 중과세제도의 헌법적 한계" 한국부동산학회 (43) : 267-284, 2010
5 박훈, "주택에 대한 양도소득세 비과세 및 감면제도의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 26 (26): 149-175, 2009
6 노영훈, "주택에 관한 양도소득세제 개편연구" 한국조세연구원 2006
7 김형준, "주택과 양도소득세(1세대1주택비과세 특례를 중심으로)" 주택금융공사 (69) : 2010
8 임언선, "주택거래 정상화관련 쟁점(양도소득세제를 중심으로)" 국회입법조사처 2010
9 김세희, "조세법개론" 송원대학출판부 2010
10 유재선, "자본이득세제에 관한 연구 : 비사업자의 부동산 양도소득 과세에 대한 입법론을 중심으로" 강남대학교 대학원 2009
11 이동영, "외국의 부동산세제에 관한 소고" 한국부동산학회 (42) : 273-283, 2010
12 안수남, "양도소득세 과세제도의 문제점과 개선방안 : 실지거래가액과세와 중과세를 중심으로" 연세대학교 법무대학원 2009
13 손경환, "양도소득세 개편의 주택시장 파급효과" 국토연구원 32 : 2001
14 박명호, "양도소득 중과제도 개편 필요성과 향후 과제" 한국조세연구원 2009
15 서병우, "소득세법해설" 탑21북스 2004
16 오인종, "부동산조세정책에 관한 일고" 한국부동산학회 39 (39): 176-186, 2009
17 노영훈, "부동산시장과 부동산조세정책 과제" 한국조세연구원 2007
18 김용민, "부동산공개념에 관한 논의" 한국부동산학회 (46) : 106-120, 2011
19 지대식, "부동산 관련 세제의 정비·개선방안 연구" 한국국토연구원 2003
20 최완호, "부동산 개발이익환수제도의 개선방안 - 전문가 의식조사를 중심으로 -" 한국부동산학회 45 (45): 48-62, 2011
21 "법제처"
22 "기획재정부"
23 "국세청"
24 David G. Davies, "United States Taxes and Tax policy" Cambrige University Press 1986
25 Hoyt, W. H, "Owner-occupied Housing, Capital Gains, and the Tax Reform Act of 1986" 32 : 119-139, 1992
26 VITO TANZI, "Inflation and the Personal Income Tax an International Perspective" Cambridge University Press 1980
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 평가 | 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
| 2019-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가) | |
| 2018-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 1.87 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.49 | 1.25 | 0.704 | 0.38 |