「京外鏤板」과 「鏤板考」와의 關係 = A Comparative Study on the relations of the Kyong-Oae-Ru-Pan(「京外鏤板」)and the Nu-Pan-Go(「鏤板考」)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Catalogue, a field of Biebliography, has much contributed to the development of study. It is because Catalogue is thought as not only the means of retrieval for a man to search the necessary books, but the categorized integration of materials for study.
This Catalogue which is the basis of the development of study and culture has early been developed since Han Dynasty(漢) in China, but the history of Catalogue in Korea is not so long.
In Jeong-Jo(正祖) monarchic periods of Yee Dynasty(朝鮮), Catalogue was greatly developed, so the Nu-Pan-Go and the Kyong-Oai-Ru-Pan were compiled. But it was become a subject of study on its author and compiled period.
Therefore, in this article, I tried to compare and analyse the relations of the Kyong-oai-Ru-Pan and the Nu-Pan-Go through comparision with their collection scope, system of classification, format of description, title treatment, author statement, collations and item damaged and excluded of wood block.
In conclusion, the relations of the Kyong-oai-Ru-Pan and the Nu-Pan-Go through their comparision and analysis is that the Kyong-Oai-Ru-Pan was edited by Seo-Yoo-Gu(徐有矩) between Jeong-Jo 14th year(1790) of Yee Dynasty, the edited year of the Nu-Pan-Go, and Jeong-Jo 20th year(1796), and that the Nu-Pan-Go was edited in Jeong-Jo 20th year after modificating and summing up on the basis of the Kyong-Oai-Ru-Pan by the Minister(閣臣) of Kyu-Jang-Gak(奎章閣).

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 緖言
• Ⅰ. 「京外鏤板」에 對한 諸問題
• 1. 撰者
• 2. 編纂時期
• Ⅱ. 「鏤板考」와의 對比
• 1. 收錄範圍
• 2. 分類體制
• 3. 解題形式
• Ⅲ. 記述形式의 對比
• 1. 書名의 處理
• 2. 著者事項
• 3. 對照事項
• 4. 완결
• 結言