RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      명시적 교수와 암시적 교수가 요청 화행 전략 표현 학습에 미치는 효과 비교 연구 -중국인 한국어 학습자를 대상으로- = The effects of explicit and implicit pragmatic instruction in Korean request strategies for Chinese learners

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104191345

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this paper is to compare the two different instruction methods for Korean learners of academic purposes in learning request expression. Participants were divided into two groups, explicit and implicit group. Both groups viewed several scenes from the drama that involved native speakers interacting in different situations. The instructional treatment for the explicit group included metapragmatic information while the treatment for the implicit group did not. On the other hand, the treatment for the implicit group followed implicit techniques, which were repetition of the video presentation and a script reading activity. This study was made up of a pre-test, a post-test, and a delayed-test. The pre-test was conducted prior to the instructional treatment. The post-test was administered a day after the last instruction and the delayed-test was conducted five weeks after the treatments. Two types of tests, speaking and writing, were used in this study to examine subjects’ knowledge of Korean request. The result of this research reveals that implicit treatment was more effective than explicit treatment in Korean learners’ request acquisition. This results might have been due to the operationalization of the implicit condition in this study. Implicit instruction may help language learners make rules by themselves through tasks. (Sookmyung Women’s University)
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to compare the two different instruction methods for Korean learners of academic purposes in learning request expression. Participants were divided into two groups, explicit and implicit group. Both groups viewed several s...

      The purpose of this paper is to compare the two different instruction methods for Korean learners of academic purposes in learning request expression. Participants were divided into two groups, explicit and implicit group. Both groups viewed several scenes from the drama that involved native speakers interacting in different situations. The instructional treatment for the explicit group included metapragmatic information while the treatment for the implicit group did not. On the other hand, the treatment for the implicit group followed implicit techniques, which were repetition of the video presentation and a script reading activity. This study was made up of a pre-test, a post-test, and a delayed-test. The pre-test was conducted prior to the instructional treatment. The post-test was administered a day after the last instruction and the delayed-test was conducted five weeks after the treatments. Two types of tests, speaking and writing, were used in this study to examine subjects’ knowledge of Korean request. The result of this research reveals that implicit treatment was more effective than explicit treatment in Korean learners’ request acquisition. This results might have been due to the operationalization of the implicit condition in this study. Implicit instruction may help language learners make rules by themselves through tasks. (Sookmyung Women’s University)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 서경희, "화행이론과 외국어 교육" 한국외국어대학교 외국어교육연구소 14 : 25-49, 2000

      2 성아영, "한국어 학습자의 거절화행 학습을 위한 연역적 교수와 귀납적 교수 효과 비교" 경희대학교 2011

      3 오경숙, "한국어 이메일 쓰기 수업에서의 언어 문화 교육" 우리말학회 (29) : 293-416, 2011

      4 김미형, "한국어 구어와 문어의 특징 연구" 한말연구학회 (15) : 23-74, 2004

      5 김제열, "한국어 교육에서 기초 문법 항목의 선정과 배열 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 12 (12): 93-121, 2001

      6 한상미, "담화 및 화용과 한국어 교육 연구" 이중언어학회 (47) : 507-551, 2011

      7 이연경, "교수의 명시성 수준에 따른 한국어 요청 화행 교수 효과 연구" 이화여자대학교 2010

      8 Schmidt, R., "The role of consciousness in second language learning" 11 : 17-46, 1990

      9 Martínez-Flor, A., "The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions" 33 : 463-480, 2005

      10 Martínez-Flor, A., "The effect of instruction on the development of pragmatic competence in the English as a foreign language context: A study based on suggestions" Universitat Jaume I 2004

      1 서경희, "화행이론과 외국어 교육" 한국외국어대학교 외국어교육연구소 14 : 25-49, 2000

      2 성아영, "한국어 학습자의 거절화행 학습을 위한 연역적 교수와 귀납적 교수 효과 비교" 경희대학교 2011

      3 오경숙, "한국어 이메일 쓰기 수업에서의 언어 문화 교육" 우리말학회 (29) : 293-416, 2011

      4 김미형, "한국어 구어와 문어의 특징 연구" 한말연구학회 (15) : 23-74, 2004

      5 김제열, "한국어 교육에서 기초 문법 항목의 선정과 배열 연구" 국제한국어교육학회 12 (12): 93-121, 2001

      6 한상미, "담화 및 화용과 한국어 교육 연구" 이중언어학회 (47) : 507-551, 2011

      7 이연경, "교수의 명시성 수준에 따른 한국어 요청 화행 교수 효과 연구" 이화여자대학교 2010

      8 Schmidt, R., "The role of consciousness in second language learning" 11 : 17-46, 1990

      9 Martínez-Flor, A., "The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions" 33 : 463-480, 2005

      10 Martínez-Flor, A., "The effect of instruction on the development of pragmatic competence in the English as a foreign language context: A study based on suggestions" Universitat Jaume I 2004

      11 Takimoto, M., "The Effects of Input-Based Tasks on the Development of Learners’ Pragmatic Proficiency" 30 (30): 1-25, 2007

      12 Jeon, E. H., "Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching" John Benjamins 165-211, 2006

      13 Blum-Kulka, S., "Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)" 5 (5): 196-213, 1984

      14 Brown, H. D., "Questions and politeness" Cambridge University Press 1978

      15 Rose, K. R., "Pragmatics in language teaching" Cambridge University Press 145-170, 2001

      16 Tateyama, Y., "Pragmatics in language teaching" Cambridge University Press 223-244, 2001

      17 Takahashi, S., "Pragmatics in language teaching" Cambridge University Press 171-199, 2001

      18 Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Pragmatics in language teaching" Cambridge University Press 13-32, 2001

      19 Fukuya, Y., "Pragmatics and language learning" University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 111-130, 2001

      20 Rose, K., "On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics" 33 (33): 385-399, 2005

      21 Biesenbach-Lucas, S., "Making requests in e-mail: Do cyber-consultations entail directness? Toward conventions in a new medium" 11 : 81-107, 2006

      22 DeKeyser, R., "Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system" 19 (19): 195-221, 1995

      23 Schmidt, R., "Interlanguage pragmatics" Oxford University Press 21-42, 1993

      24 Berry, C. D, "Implicit and explicit learning of languages" Academic Press 147-164, 1994

      25 DeKeyser, R., "Handbook of second language acquisition" Blackwell 313-343, 2003

      26 Alcón, E., "Fostering EFL learners’ awareness of requesting through explicit and implicit consciousness-raising tasks" 20 : 221-241, 2007

      27 Bardovi-Harlig, K., "Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics" 49 : 677-713, 1999

      28 Tateyama, Y., "Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines" 8 : 163-177, 1997

      29 Fukuya, Y., "Effects of recasts on EFL learners’ acquisition of pragmalinguistic conventions of requests" 21 (21): 1-47, 2002

      30 Norris, J., "Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis" 50 : 417-528, 2000

      31 Alcón, E., "Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the foreign language context?" 33 (33): 417-435, 2005

      32 Fukuya, Y., "Does focus on form work for teaching sociopragmatics?" 1998

      33 Kasper, G., "Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics" 18 : 149-169, 1996

      34 House, J., "Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness" 18 : 225-252, 1996

      35 Schmidt, R., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning" University of Hawai‘i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center 1-63, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-10-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국어 교육 -> 한국어교육 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.88 0.88 0.94
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.95 1.03 1.37 0.35
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼