RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      슐레겔(August W. Schlegel)의 셰익스피어 비평

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100480745

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Critics in the neoclassical period criticized Shakespeare’s use of degenerating expressions, vulgar words, bombasts and his excessive use of puns. Furthermore, they criticized Shakespeare’s violation of the three unities and his lack of moral instruction or poetic justice. Their views of Shakespeare were limited by neoclassical principles. August W. Schlegel, the representative German critic of Shakespeare in the romantic period, defended Shakespeare’s disregard of the three unities, pointing out the negative aspects of the esthetic of delusion as Samuel Johnson did. He also defended Shakespeare’s “mingled drama,” and his defence was based on his belief that it is a more natural form of drama to exhibit the real state of a real world.
      Schlegel’s contribution to the understanding of Shakespeare’s originality lies in his theory of organic unity and imagination. In A Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature, Schlegel wrote: “Organical form ... is innate; it unfolds itself from within, and acquires its determination contemporaneously with the perfect development of the germ.... All genuine forms are organical.” Schlegel believed in the power of imagination which can combine many things into one large whole to produce dramatic unity. Schlegel praised Shakespeare’s genius in keeping organic unity in his works and his way of representing the ultimate end of human feeling. For Schlegel, the proof of Shakespeare’s genius is in the creation of various vital characters who mirror each other in an organic form.
      번역하기

      Critics in the neoclassical period criticized Shakespeare’s use of degenerating expressions, vulgar words, bombasts and his excessive use of puns. Furthermore, they criticized Shakespeare’s violation of the three unities and his lack of moral inst...

      Critics in the neoclassical period criticized Shakespeare’s use of degenerating expressions, vulgar words, bombasts and his excessive use of puns. Furthermore, they criticized Shakespeare’s violation of the three unities and his lack of moral instruction or poetic justice. Their views of Shakespeare were limited by neoclassical principles. August W. Schlegel, the representative German critic of Shakespeare in the romantic period, defended Shakespeare’s disregard of the three unities, pointing out the negative aspects of the esthetic of delusion as Samuel Johnson did. He also defended Shakespeare’s “mingled drama,” and his defence was based on his belief that it is a more natural form of drama to exhibit the real state of a real world.
      Schlegel’s contribution to the understanding of Shakespeare’s originality lies in his theory of organic unity and imagination. In A Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature, Schlegel wrote: “Organical form ... is innate; it unfolds itself from within, and acquires its determination contemporaneously with the perfect development of the germ.... All genuine forms are organical.” Schlegel believed in the power of imagination which can combine many things into one large whole to produce dramatic unity. Schlegel praised Shakespeare’s genius in keeping organic unity in his works and his way of representing the ultimate end of human feeling. For Schlegel, the proof of Shakespeare’s genius is in the creation of various vital characters who mirror each other in an organic form.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 인용문헌
      • Abstract
      • 인용문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김종환, "코울리지의 셰익스피어 비평" 한국셰익스피어학회 41 (41): 46-68, 2005

      2 임한순, "독일의 셰익스피어 수용과 고전문학기 희곡의 발전" 1-30, 1996

      3 Mack, Maynard, "The World of Hamlet" 41 : 502-523, 1952

      4 Raysor, Thomas Middleton, "Shakespearean Criticism I, II" Dent 1960

      5 Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, "Shakespearean Criticism I, II" Dent 1960

      6 Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, "Selected Prose Works of G. E. Lessing" George Bell and Sons 1890

      7 Greene, Donald, "Samuel Johnson" Twayne Pub. 1989

      8 Adler, J. H., "Johnson’s ‘He That Imagines This" 11 : 225-228, 1960

      9 Johnson, Samuel, "Johnson on Shakespeare, The Yale edition of the works of Samuel Johnson, Vol. 7 & 8" Yale UP 1968

      10 Voltaire, "Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greek to Grotowski" Holt Rinehart and Winston 280-298, 1974

      1 김종환, "코울리지의 셰익스피어 비평" 한국셰익스피어학회 41 (41): 46-68, 2005

      2 임한순, "독일의 셰익스피어 수용과 고전문학기 희곡의 발전" 1-30, 1996

      3 Mack, Maynard, "The World of Hamlet" 41 : 502-523, 1952

      4 Raysor, Thomas Middleton, "Shakespearean Criticism I, II" Dent 1960

      5 Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, "Shakespearean Criticism I, II" Dent 1960

      6 Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, "Selected Prose Works of G. E. Lessing" George Bell and Sons 1890

      7 Greene, Donald, "Samuel Johnson" Twayne Pub. 1989

      8 Adler, J. H., "Johnson’s ‘He That Imagines This" 11 : 225-228, 1960

      9 Johnson, Samuel, "Johnson on Shakespeare, The Yale edition of the works of Samuel Johnson, Vol. 7 & 8" Yale UP 1968

      10 Voltaire, "Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greek to Grotowski" Holt Rinehart and Winston 280-298, 1974

      11 Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, "Criticism: The Major Texts" Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 364-375, 1970

      12 Bate, W. J., "Criticism: The Major Texts" Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1970

      13 Orsini, G. N. G., "Coleridge and Schlegel Reconsidered" 16 (16): 100-119, 1964

      14 Wimsatt, William K. Jr, "Classical Criticism: A Short History" Routledge & Kegan Paul 1957

      15 Hazlitt, William, "Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays" Oxford UP 1959

      16 Eastman, Arthur M, "A Short History of Shakespearean Criticism" Norton 1974

      17 Ralli, Augustus, "A History of Shakespearean Criticism. Vol. I" Humanities P 1965

      18 Schlegel. August W, "A Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature" Ams P 1965

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.12 0.12 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.12 0.11 0.561 0.03
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼