내셔널리즘의 딜레마

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Nationalism is a particular and universal project at the same time. While it encourages individuals to see themselves as members of a particular community, nationalism in itself exposes the common formulations and vocabularies among different national experiences and narratives. This is a sort of dilemma of nationalism that produces a question of translation. And different translations lead to different understandings of the nature of nationalism. This essay asks whether the relevant Korean term for nation is Minjok or Kukmin, and how we can estimate the power and endurance of nationalism. First, although Korean Minjok which implies strong ethnic and cultural communalities in a dictionary sense seems to be similar to ethnie rather than nation, Minjok is very close to nation in a specific Korean context. Meanwhile, nation is very close to Minjok in that from the outset a word nation did not lose a meaning as a community by birth and fate in a Western context. Second, telling civic nationalism from ethnic nationalism is problematic, and it can be recognized that ethnicity and citizenship in nation-state function as logics for repression and exclusion. We thus encounter another dilemma in the process of reproducing nation by which alienating ‘Others’ immediately means identifying and disciplining ‘Us’ at the same time. Of importance is, however, the fact that ethnicity and citizenship also show the possibilities for liberty and inclusion. Indeed, nationalism is not inherently good or bad, and what matters is to persistently advocate the rights of ethnic minorities and non-citizens in nation-state, enlarging and deepening the scope and extent of democracy. These propositions remind us to reconsider the power and endurance of nationalism, in particular, in a globalized world.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가며
• 2. 네이션의 번역
• 3. 내셔널리즘의 성격
• 4. 결론을 대신하여
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장문석, "호모 사케르와 피노키오 사이에서: 아감벤과 이딸리아의 생명정치" 영미문학연구회 (31) : 115-142, 2011

2 장문석, "호모 사케르와 이탈리아 현대사" 104 : 431-433, 2010

3 아감벤, "호모 사케르: 주권 권력과 벌거벗은 생명" 252-255,

4 박진우, "호모 사케르 : 주권 권력과 벌거벗은 생명" 새물결 249-250, 2008

5 진태원, "어떤 상상의 공동체? 민족, 국민 그리고 그 너머" 역사문제연구소 (96) : 169-201, 2011

6 장문석, "민족주의 길들이기: 로마 몰락에서 유럽 통합까지 다시 쓰는 민족주의의 역사" 지식의풍경 31-33, 2007

7 장문석, "민족주의" 책세상 142-144, 2011

8 이태훈, "민족 개념의 역사적 전개 과정과 그것이 의미하는 것" 98 (98): 2012

9 조르조 아감벤, "목적 없는 수단" 난장 30-31, 2009

10 지은주, "갈등의 정체성" 나남 45-64, 2008

11 Yael Tamir, "The Enigma of Nationalism" 47 (47): 418-, 1995

12 Aviel Roshwald, "The Endurance of Nationalism: Ancient Roots and Modern Dilemmas" Cambridge University Press 300-, 2006

13 Anthony D. Smith, "The Cultural Foundations of Nations: Hierarchy, Covernant, and Republic" Blackwell Publishing 23-, 2008

14 Adrian Hastings, "The Construction of Nationhood:Ethnicity, Religion and Nationalism" Cambridge University Press 16-, 1997

15 Steven Groby, "Nationalism: A Very Short Introduction" Oxford University Press 20-, 2005

16 John Breuilly, "Nationalism and the State" The University of Chicago Press 3-, 1982

17 Edward Webster, "Grounding Globalization: Labour in the Age of Insecurity" Blackwell Publishing 6-7, 2008

18 Tamir, "Enigma of Nationalism" 430-,

19 Thomas H, Eriksen, "Echinicity, Race, Class and Nation, In John Hutchinson and Anthony D. Smith" Oxford University Press 28-31, 1996