RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      다단계판매에 있어 부담부과행위, 의무부과행위 및 사실상 금전거래행위의 판단기준 검토 = A study on regulations about excessive burden, excessive money collection, and making a monetary transaction in multi-level marketing

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Act on door-to-door sales, etc. have various provisions about multi-level marketing to restrain speculative transactions. The prohibitions of taking an excessive burden to salesperson, excessive money collection, and making a monetary transaction are typical regulations. But in practically, it's not easy to apply these regulations properly because the requirements of these provisions are not explicitly classified.
      According to the relative cases, the prohibition of taking an excessive burden is applied to the transactions of goods and services. On the other hand, the prohibition of taking excessive money collection is applied to collect money related to imposing obligations without transactions of goods and services. And about the status of salesperson which is a condition of the regulations, the Supreme Court seems to judge whether it is actually a salesperson who receives a substantial amount of sponsorship money.
      In application of the prohibition of making a monetary transaction, the Supreme Court allowed a standard of judgment of lower instance which presented the factors like objective value of the goods, purchase status, commodity price, refund policy, actual quality as a matter of consideration. Recently, the Supreme Court allowed a judgement of lower instance about receiving advance payments does not automatically constitute a monetary transaction.
      Given the attitude of current laws and precedents, it is necessary to come up with an appropriate regulation of receiving advance payments. In addition, the regulations about prohibiting excessive burden and excessive money collection need to be combined to one provision.
      번역하기

      The Act on door-to-door sales, etc. have various provisions about multi-level marketing to restrain speculative transactions. The prohibitions of taking an excessive burden to salesperson, excessive money collection, and making a monetary transaction ...

      The Act on door-to-door sales, etc. have various provisions about multi-level marketing to restrain speculative transactions. The prohibitions of taking an excessive burden to salesperson, excessive money collection, and making a monetary transaction are typical regulations. But in practically, it's not easy to apply these regulations properly because the requirements of these provisions are not explicitly classified.
      According to the relative cases, the prohibition of taking an excessive burden is applied to the transactions of goods and services. On the other hand, the prohibition of taking excessive money collection is applied to collect money related to imposing obligations without transactions of goods and services. And about the status of salesperson which is a condition of the regulations, the Supreme Court seems to judge whether it is actually a salesperson who receives a substantial amount of sponsorship money.
      In application of the prohibition of making a monetary transaction, the Supreme Court allowed a standard of judgment of lower instance which presented the factors like objective value of the goods, purchase status, commodity price, refund policy, actual quality as a matter of consideration. Recently, the Supreme Court allowed a judgement of lower instance about receiving advance payments does not automatically constitute a monetary transaction.
      Given the attitude of current laws and precedents, it is necessary to come up with an appropriate regulation of receiving advance payments. In addition, the regulations about prohibiting excessive burden and excessive money collection need to be combined to one provision.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이호영, "소비자보호법" 홍문사 2018

      2 박수영, "소비자법해설" 피데스 2016

      3 김현수, "방문판매법상 다단계판매의 법적 문제점과 공제조합 운영의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 선문대학교 2018

      4 김홍석, "다단계판매와 방문판매법에 관한 해설" 잎새 2008

      5 곽관훈, "다단계판매산업 규제의 합리적 개선방안" 4 (4): 2017

      6 장윤순, "다단계판매 규제 및 개선방안에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 38 (38): 515-535, 2018

      7 양명조, "경제법" 신조사 2016

      8 이기수, "경제법" 세창출판사 2012

      9 김홍석, "개정 방문판매법 해설" 잎새 2012

      1 이호영, "소비자보호법" 홍문사 2018

      2 박수영, "소비자법해설" 피데스 2016

      3 김현수, "방문판매법상 다단계판매의 법적 문제점과 공제조합 운영의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 선문대학교 2018

      4 김홍석, "다단계판매와 방문판매법에 관한 해설" 잎새 2008

      5 곽관훈, "다단계판매산업 규제의 합리적 개선방안" 4 (4): 2017

      6 장윤순, "다단계판매 규제 및 개선방안에 관한 연구" 법학연구소 38 (38): 515-535, 2018

      7 양명조, "경제법" 신조사 2016

      8 이기수, "경제법" 세창출판사 2012

      9 김홍석, "개정 방문판매법 해설" 잎새 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.86 0.86 0.93
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.86 0.981 0.86
      더보기

      연관 공개강의(KOCW)

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼