RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    無國籍者의 地位에 관한 協約 = The Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2117405

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It can not be said that the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (the Convention) has been as popular as other international human rights conventions. The Convention has only 42 parties in December of 1995. The reason for less popularity is not that this Convention commands too high standard to be achieved by parties, but that the problem of the stateless persons does not draw as much attention in international society as in 1940's or 1950's. Also other human rights conventions which are to be applied to "everyone" take much part of the role for the protection of the stateless persons in international society. This Convention was, however, the first product of international community for the purpose of protecting the legal status of stateless persons, and until now it has been the only international treaty for that purpose in global application. And several provisions, for example, article 7, article 8, article 25, article 27, article 28 and article 31, may play unique role to improve the legal status of stateless persons. So the raison d'etre of the Convention can not be ignored.
    The Republic of Korea deposited the ratification letter of this Convention on August 22, 1962 without reservation. Even if more than three decades has passed since then, some of Korean law are not consistent with the contents of the Convention. The rights protected by para. 2 & S of article 7, article 23, para. 1 of article 24, article 25, article 27 and article 31 of the Convention are not fully guranteed by current Korean law. Prompt revision of Korean domestic law is the obligation as a party.
    번역하기

    It can not be said that the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (the Convention) has been as popular as other international human rights conventions. The Convention has only 42 parties in December of 1995. The reason for less popula...

    It can not be said that the Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (the Convention) has been as popular as other international human rights conventions. The Convention has only 42 parties in December of 1995. The reason for less popularity is not that this Convention commands too high standard to be achieved by parties, but that the problem of the stateless persons does not draw as much attention in international society as in 1940's or 1950's. Also other human rights conventions which are to be applied to "everyone" take much part of the role for the protection of the stateless persons in international society. This Convention was, however, the first product of international community for the purpose of protecting the legal status of stateless persons, and until now it has been the only international treaty for that purpose in global application. And several provisions, for example, article 7, article 8, article 25, article 27, article 28 and article 31, may play unique role to improve the legal status of stateless persons. So the raison d'etre of the Convention can not be ignored.
    The Republic of Korea deposited the ratification letter of this Convention on August 22, 1962 without reservation. Even if more than three decades has passed since then, some of Korean law are not consistent with the contents of the Convention. The rights protected by para. 2 & S of article 7, article 23, para. 1 of article 24, article 25, article 27 and article 31 of the Convention are not fully guranteed by current Korean law. Prompt revision of Korean domestic law is the obligation as a party.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서
    • 2. 협약의 성립배경
    • 3. 협약의 내용
    • 가. 대상자
    • 나. 대우의 내용
    • 1. 서
    • 2. 협약의 성립배경
    • 3. 협약의 내용
    • 가. 대상자
    • 나. 대우의 내용
    • 다. 難民條約과의 비교
    • 4. 관련 국내법 검토
    • 5. 절
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼