RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영어 L1과 L2 사용자의 학술 논문에 나타난 상위담화 비교 분석 = A Comparative Analysis of Metadiscourse Use between Native English Writers (L1) and Korean English Writers (L2) in Academic Writing.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76527806

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to shed light on how native English writers (L1) and Korean writers (L2) of applied linguistics develop a relationship with their readers and make a logical process in their English writing. To this end, this study examines a total of 100 discussion sections of applied linguistics based on Hyland's (2004) model: 50 native English writers' and 50 Korean writers' in English. This study draws the frequency of metadiscourse marker use, finds its differences between the two groups and figures out its characteristics. After the analysis of the frequency in metadiscourse marker use, chi-square tests were carried out to reveal if there is any significant difference between the two groups. The analysis revealed that the differences in using interactional resources are more distinguished than that in interactive resources in the two language groups.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to shed light on how native English writers (L1) and Korean writers (L2) of applied linguistics develop a relationship with their readers and make a logical process in their English writing. To this end, this study examine...

    The purpose of this study is to shed light on how native English writers (L1) and Korean writers (L2) of applied linguistics develop a relationship with their readers and make a logical process in their English writing. To this end, this study examines a total of 100 discussion sections of applied linguistics based on Hyland's (2004) model: 50 native English writers' and 50 Korean writers' in English. This study draws the frequency of metadiscourse marker use, finds its differences between the two groups and figures out its characteristics. After the analysis of the frequency in metadiscourse marker use, chi-square tests were carried out to reveal if there is any significant difference between the two groups. The analysis revealed that the differences in using interactional resources are more distinguished than that in interactive resources in the two language groups.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 상위담화에 대한 최근 연구 동향
    • 3. 연구 방법
    • 4. 연구결과 및 논의
    • 5. 결론
    • 1. 서론
    • 2. 상위담화에 대한 최근 연구 동향
    • 3. 연구 방법
    • 4. 연구결과 및 논의
    • 5. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 부록
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박밀, "학술 영작문에 나타난 상위담화" 서울대학교 2006

    2 이주영, "고등학교 영어교과서의 상위담화 연구" 한양대학교 2004

    3 Myers, Greg, "Writing biology" University of Wisconsin Press 1990

    4 Ivani, Roz, "Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing" John Benjamins Publishing Company 1998

    5 Cadman, Kate, "Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity?" 16 (16): 13-14, 1997

    6 Kuo, Chih-Hua, "The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles" 18 (18): 121-138, 1999

    7 Intarraprawat, Puangpen, "The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays" 4 (4): 253-272, 1995

    8 Bunton, David, "The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses" 18 (18): 41-56, 1999

    9 Thompson, Geoff, "The sound of one hand clapping" 15 : 103-127, 1995

    10 Crismore, Avon, "The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse" 16 (16): 279-296, 1984

    1 박밀, "학술 영작문에 나타난 상위담화" 서울대학교 2006

    2 이주영, "고등학교 영어교과서의 상위담화 연구" 한양대학교 2004

    3 Myers, Greg, "Writing biology" University of Wisconsin Press 1990

    4 Ivani, Roz, "Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing" John Benjamins Publishing Company 1998

    5 Cadman, Kate, "Thesis writing for international students: A question of identity?" 16 (16): 13-14, 1997

    6 Kuo, Chih-Hua, "The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles" 18 (18): 121-138, 1999

    7 Intarraprawat, Puangpen, "The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays" 4 (4): 253-272, 1995

    8 Bunton, David, "The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses" 18 (18): 41-56, 1999

    9 Thompson, Geoff, "The sound of one hand clapping" 15 : 103-127, 1995

    10 Crismore, Avon, "The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse" 16 (16): 279-296, 1984

    11 Dahl, Trine, "Textual metadiscourse in research article: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline?" 36 (36): 1807-1825, 2004

    12 Crismore, Avon, "Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act" Peter Lang 1989

    13 Hyland, Ken, "Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory coursebooks" 18 (18): 3-26, 1999

    14 Williams, Joseph. M, "Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace" Scott Foresman 2006

    15 Hyland, Ken, "Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse" 7 (7): 173-192, 2005

    16 Vande Kopple, William, "Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse" 36 : 82-93, 1985

    17 Hempel, Susann, "Sequencers in different text genres: Academic writing, journalese and fiction" 40 (40): 676-693, 2008

    18 Kim, Jin-Wan, "Rhetorical functions of metadiscourse in EFL writing" 54 (54): 3-25, 1999

    19 Hyland, Ken, "Persuasion and contest: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse" 30 (30): 437-455, 1998

    20 Vande Kopple, William, "Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. Discourse studies in composition" Hampton Press 91-113, 2002

    21 Crismore, Avon, "Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students" 10 (10): 39-71, 1993

    22 Ryoo, Mi-Lim, "Metadiscourse in compuer-mediated communication in a culturally diverse group" 12 (12): 21-49, 2005

    23 Hyland. Ken, "Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal" 25 (25): 156-177, 2004

    24 Crismore, Avon, "Metadiscourse and discourse Processes: Interactions and issues" (13) : 191-205, 1990

    25 Schiffrin, Deborah, "Meta-Talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse" 50 (50): 199-236, 1980

    26 Thompson, Geoff, "Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader" 22 (22): 58-78, 2001

    27 Chang, Yu-Ying, "Informal elements in English academic writing: Threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices" Longman 145-167, 1999

    28 Hyland, Ken, "Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles, English" 20 (20): 207-226, 2001

    29 Hyland, Ken, "Hedging in scientific research articles" John Benjamins Publishing Company 1998

    30 Swales, John, "Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings" Cambridge University Press 1990

    31 Hyland, Ken, "Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter" 35 (35): 224-244, 1998

    32 Hunston, Susan, "Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse" Oxford University Press 2000

    33 Hyland, Ken, "Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writings" 13 (13): 133-151, 2004

    34 Hyland, Ken, "Disciplinary discourses: Social interaction in academic writing" Longman 2000

    35 Faghih Esmail, "Contrastive rhetoric of English and Persian written texts: Metadiscourse in applied linguistics research articles" 1 : 92-107, 2009

    36 Valero-Garces, Carmen, "Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English economics texts" 5 (5): 279-294, 1996

    37 Mauranen, Anna, "Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts" 12 (12): 3-22, 1993

    38 Cuenca, Maria J, "Contrasting the form and the use of reformulation marker" 9 (9): 149-175, 2007

    39 Ryoo, Mi-Lim, "Code glosses in L1 and L2 research articles" 165-170, 2008

    40 Hyland, Ken, "Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles" 18 (18): 249-574, 2001

    41 Halliday, Michael. A. K, "An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd ed" Edward Arnold 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-09-01 학회명변경 영문명 :   -> The Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea KCI등재
    2014-01-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Discourse and Cognition KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 담화ㆍ인지언어학회 -> 담화·인지언어학회
    영문명 : 미등록 ->  
    KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-04-29 학술지등록 한글명 : 담화와 인지
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.49 0.53 0.841 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼