RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      수학적 모델 및 퍼지 추론에 의한 고도 활성슬러지 공정의 통합 평가 = Integrated Evaluation of Advanced Activated Sludge Processes Based on Mathematical Model and Fuzzy Inference

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104375294

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      At present, the biological nutrient removal (BNR) process for removal of nitrogen and phosphorus is being constructing to keep pace with the reinforced standard of effluent quality and the traditional activated sludge process of preexistence is being promoting to retrofit. At the most case of retrofitting, processes are subjected to be under consideration as alternative BNR process for retrofitting. However, process evaluation methods are restricted to compare only treatment efficiency. Therefore, when BNR process apply, process evaluation was needed various method for treatment efficiency as well as sludge production and aeration cost, and all. In this study, the evaluation method of alternative process was suggested for the case for retrofitting S wastewater treatment plant which has been operated the standard activated sludge process. Three BNR processes for evaluation of proper alternatative process were selected and evaluated with suggested method. The selected $A^2$/O, VIP and DNR processes were evaluated using the mathematical model which is time and cost effective as well as gathered objective evaluation criteria. The evaluation between 5 individual criteria was possible including sludge production and energy efficiency as well as treatment performance. The objective final decision method for selection of optimal process was established through the fuzzy inference.
      번역하기

      At present, the biological nutrient removal (BNR) process for removal of nitrogen and phosphorus is being constructing to keep pace with the reinforced standard of effluent quality and the traditional activated sludge process of preexistence is being ...

      At present, the biological nutrient removal (BNR) process for removal of nitrogen and phosphorus is being constructing to keep pace with the reinforced standard of effluent quality and the traditional activated sludge process of preexistence is being promoting to retrofit. At the most case of retrofitting, processes are subjected to be under consideration as alternative BNR process for retrofitting. However, process evaluation methods are restricted to compare only treatment efficiency. Therefore, when BNR process apply, process evaluation was needed various method for treatment efficiency as well as sludge production and aeration cost, and all. In this study, the evaluation method of alternative process was suggested for the case for retrofitting S wastewater treatment plant which has been operated the standard activated sludge process. Three BNR processes for evaluation of proper alternatative process were selected and evaluated with suggested method. The selected $A^2$/O, VIP and DNR processes were evaluated using the mathematical model which is time and cost effective as well as gathered objective evaluation criteria. The evaluation between 5 individual criteria was possible including sludge production and energy efficiency as well as treatment performance. The objective final decision method for selection of optimal process was established through the fuzzy inference.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 환경부, "하수도통계"

      2 오수진, "정량적인 인과관계표를 이용한 5단분할 주입질소∙인제거공정의PID 제어" 부산대학교 2006

      3 정정은, "안정화된 침출수의 고농도 질소제거에 요구되는 대체외 부탄소원 선정 및 적용에 관한 연구" 부산대학교 2005

      4 이의신, "생물학적 질소∙인제거(DNR) 공법" 10 (10): 98-104, 2002

      5 김민한, "모델링 기법을 이용한 하수처리 공정 설계와 환경성 및 경제성 평가" 한국화학공학회 46 (46): 610-618, 2008

      6 환경관리공단, "고도처리공법"

      7 P. Aarne Vesilind, "Wastewater Treatment Plant Design" Water Environment Federation 2003

      8 Copp, J. B., "The COST simulation benchmark: description and simulator mamual" Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg 2002

      9 Lee, S. H., "Practical approach to parameter estimation for ASM3+bio-P module applied to five-stage step-feed EBPR process" 53 (53): 139-148, 2006

      10 Jeppson, U., "Modelling Aspects of Wastewater Treatment Processes" Lund Institute of Technology 1996

      1 환경부, "하수도통계"

      2 오수진, "정량적인 인과관계표를 이용한 5단분할 주입질소∙인제거공정의PID 제어" 부산대학교 2006

      3 정정은, "안정화된 침출수의 고농도 질소제거에 요구되는 대체외 부탄소원 선정 및 적용에 관한 연구" 부산대학교 2005

      4 이의신, "생물학적 질소∙인제거(DNR) 공법" 10 (10): 98-104, 2002

      5 김민한, "모델링 기법을 이용한 하수처리 공정 설계와 환경성 및 경제성 평가" 한국화학공학회 46 (46): 610-618, 2008

      6 환경관리공단, "고도처리공법"

      7 P. Aarne Vesilind, "Wastewater Treatment Plant Design" Water Environment Federation 2003

      8 Copp, J. B., "The COST simulation benchmark: description and simulator mamual" Office for Official Publications of the European Community, Luxembourg 2002

      9 Lee, S. H., "Practical approach to parameter estimation for ASM3+bio-P module applied to five-stage step-feed EBPR process" 53 (53): 139-148, 2006

      10 Jeppson, U., "Modelling Aspects of Wastewater Treatment Processes" Lund Institute of Technology 1996

      11 Orhon, D., "COD fractionation in wastewater characterization-The state of the art" 68 : 284-293, 1996

      12 Takacs, I., "A dynamic model of the clarification thickening process" 25 (25): 1263-1271, 1991

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.52 0.52 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.43 0.42 0.604 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼