The objective of this article views the solutions through the legal estimation over North Korea"s nuclear issues. Firstly this article analyzes the legal estimation over North Korea"s withdrawal from the NPT, namely deals with th...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76472904
2006
-
360
KCI등재
학술저널
499-520(22쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The objective of this article views the solutions through the legal estimation over North Korea"s nuclear issues. Firstly this article analyzes the legal estimation over North Korea"s withdrawal from the NPT, namely deals with th...
The objective of this article views the solutions through the legal estimation over North Korea"s nuclear issues. Firstly this article analyzes the legal estimation over North Korea"s withdrawal from the NPT, namely deals with the NPT accession of North Korea, a fundamental duty of NPT, the declaration of withdrawal and the legality of the withdrawal. And then this article views the solutions toward the issues simultaneously, namely deals with the North Korea-US Geneva Agreed Framework, the Perry Report, the Armitage Report, the Joint Statement of Six-Party Talks on North Korea"s nuclear programme, the Libya Model, a mixed model and so on.<BR> In conclusion, although the Joint Statement of Six-Party Talks was adopted, it"s tantalizing the North Korean nuclear issues to begin in 1992 remains to be solved. And it is proposed that it need a new way to solve the issues. What should the solution be for the issues? And what way could be reasonable? Now we are at an important point for pondering the issues. Accordingly it"s useful to suggest some opinions toward solutions to the issues.<BR> First of all, most important thing to solve North Korean nuclear issues is to restore the confidence among parties, particularly North Korea-US. In fact US has regarded North Korea as axis of evil after 9.11 terror attacks. It needs to restore the confidence between North Korea and US right now.<BR> Secondly relating the issues, our government has to play an active role. Our government should help North Korea return the good member of international community as quickly as possible, too.
목차 (Table of Contents)
정리해고의 정당성 - 대법원 2006.1.26. 선고 2003다69393 판결
개념법학과 이익법학을 넘어선 법도그마틱 구상 - 루만의 법도그마틱 구상을 중심으로 하여
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2018-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2017-10-24 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-10-10 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review | ![]() |
| 2008-05-13 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.71 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.6 | 0.57 | 0.849 | 0.28 |