RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    북한의 핵무기비확산조약(NPT) 탈퇴에 대한 법적 평가와 그 전망 = The view and legal estimation over North Korea"s withdrawal from the NPT

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The objective of this article views the solutions through the legal estimation over North Korea"s nuclear issues. Firstly this article analyzes the legal estimation over North Korea"s withdrawal from the NPT, namely deals with the NPT accession of North Korea, a fundamental duty of NPT, the declaration of withdrawal and the legality of the withdrawal. And then this article views the solutions toward the issues simultaneously, namely deals with the North Korea-US Geneva Agreed Framework, the Perry Report, the Armitage Report, the Joint Statement of Six-Party Talks on North Korea"s nuclear programme, the Libya Model, a mixed model and so on.<BR>  In conclusion, although the Joint Statement of Six-Party Talks was adopted, it"s tantalizing the North Korean nuclear issues to begin in 1992 remains to be solved. And it is proposed that it need a new way to solve the issues. What should the solution be for the issues? And what way could be reasonable? Now we are at an important point for pondering the issues. Accordingly it"s useful to suggest some opinions toward solutions to the issues.<BR>  First of all, most important thing to solve North Korean nuclear issues is to restore the confidence among parties, particularly North Korea-US. In fact US has regarded North Korea as axis of evil after 9.11 terror attacks. It needs to restore the confidence between North Korea and US right now.<BR>  Secondly relating the issues, our government has to play an active role. Our government should help North Korea return the good member of international community as quickly as possible, too.
    번역하기

      The objective of this article views the solutions through the legal estimation over North Korea"s nuclear issues. Firstly this article analyzes the legal estimation over North Korea"s withdrawal from the NPT, namely deals with th...

      The objective of this article views the solutions through the legal estimation over North Korea"s nuclear issues. Firstly this article analyzes the legal estimation over North Korea"s withdrawal from the NPT, namely deals with the NPT accession of North Korea, a fundamental duty of NPT, the declaration of withdrawal and the legality of the withdrawal. And then this article views the solutions toward the issues simultaneously, namely deals with the North Korea-US Geneva Agreed Framework, the Perry Report, the Armitage Report, the Joint Statement of Six-Party Talks on North Korea"s nuclear programme, the Libya Model, a mixed model and so on.<BR>  In conclusion, although the Joint Statement of Six-Party Talks was adopted, it"s tantalizing the North Korean nuclear issues to begin in 1992 remains to be solved. And it is proposed that it need a new way to solve the issues. What should the solution be for the issues? And what way could be reasonable? Now we are at an important point for pondering the issues. Accordingly it"s useful to suggest some opinions toward solutions to the issues.<BR>  First of all, most important thing to solve North Korean nuclear issues is to restore the confidence among parties, particularly North Korea-US. In fact US has regarded North Korea as axis of evil after 9.11 terror attacks. It needs to restore the confidence between North Korea and US right now.<BR>  Secondly relating the issues, our government has to play an active role. Our government should help North Korea return the good member of international community as quickly as possible, too.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. NPT탈퇴의 법적 평가
      Ⅲ. 해결방안
      Ⅳ. 맺는 말
      ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. NPT탈퇴의 법적 평가
      Ⅲ. 해결방안
      Ⅳ. 맺는 말
      ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2017-10-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 법학연구원 KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> SungKyunKwan Law Review KCI등재
    2008-05-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 비교법연구소 -> 법학연구소
    영문명 : Institute for Comparative Legal Studies -> The Institute of Legal Studies
    KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.64 0.64 0.71
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.57 0.849 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼