RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국의 첨단과학산업단지 개발사업에 대한 사회학적 분석 : 광주·부산·인천 지역을 중심으로 = Sociological Analysis on the Technopole Project in Korea : focused on case study on Kwanju·Pusan·Inchon

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T7880268

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The main purpose of this study is to define the characteristics of technoploe project in Korea through case study.
    There is rarely any technopoles in Korea with except of Taedok Science Park in Taejon. So we must start from project level.
    For the investigation, this study pays attention to three cases : three technopoles in Kwangju, Pusan and Inchon all which are in process.
    The data used in this study are document, phamplet from development agencies, neswpaper and the local council proceedings.
    The results of this study are as follows :
    First, it often depends on political decision by Central Goverment to make technopole initiatives. Especially, this trend is distinguished in Pusan, Kwangju.
    Second, the role of local goverment is weak because most administration system is directed to Central Goverment. Therefore without the support of Central Goverment, it is impossible to go through the project.
    Third, beyond each case's difference, three cases have common difficulty. : They have lied not in Seoul which, in 1987, accounted for 43.6 percent of national manufacturing output, and for 62.8 percent of high-technology manufacturing output.
    Thus to solve the problem of uneven development is very important.
    In Korea, It may be early to discuss the development strategy through the partnership between public agency and private sector.
    However, Media Valley in Inchon are in process by the third sector way which is partnership between public agencies and private sectors.
    It is necessary to pay attention to it.
    번역하기

    The main purpose of this study is to define the characteristics of technoploe project in Korea through case study. There is rarely any technopoles in Korea with except of Taedok Science Park in Taejon. So we must start from project level. For the in...

    The main purpose of this study is to define the characteristics of technoploe project in Korea through case study.
    There is rarely any technopoles in Korea with except of Taedok Science Park in Taejon. So we must start from project level.
    For the investigation, this study pays attention to three cases : three technopoles in Kwangju, Pusan and Inchon all which are in process.
    The data used in this study are document, phamplet from development agencies, neswpaper and the local council proceedings.
    The results of this study are as follows :
    First, it often depends on political decision by Central Goverment to make technopole initiatives. Especially, this trend is distinguished in Pusan, Kwangju.
    Second, the role of local goverment is weak because most administration system is directed to Central Goverment. Therefore without the support of Central Goverment, it is impossible to go through the project.
    Third, beyond each case's difference, three cases have common difficulty. : They have lied not in Seoul which, in 1987, accounted for 43.6 percent of national manufacturing output, and for 62.8 percent of high-technology manufacturing output.
    Thus to solve the problem of uneven development is very important.
    In Korea, It may be early to discuss the development strategy through the partnership between public agency and private sector.
    However, Media Valley in Inchon are in process by the third sector way which is partnership between public agencies and private sectors.
    It is necessary to pay attention to it.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • <목차>
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 첨단과학산업단지에 대한 선행연구들 = 5
    • ⑴과학산업단지를 바라보는 관점 = 5
    • ①첨단과학산업단지의 개념 및 유형
    • <목차>
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 첨단과학산업단지에 대한 선행연구들 = 5
    • ⑴과학산업단지를 바라보는 관점 = 5
    • ①첨단과학산업단지의 개념 및 유형
    • ②정책적 관점
    • ③사회학적 관점
    • ⑵세계의 과학산업단지 조성사례 = 15
    • ①세계의 과학산업단지에 대한 개괄
    • ②실리콘밸리
    • ⑶한국의 과학산업단지에 대한 현단계 연구들 = 21
    • ①과학기술연구단지 조성계획에 대한 현황 및 문제점
    • ②과학산업단지에 대한 연구동향
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 및 분석틀 = 28
    • ⑴연구방법
    • ⑵분석틀
    • Ⅳ. 지역별 과학산업단지에 대한 사례연구 = 32
    • ⑴광주-첨단산업단지 = 32
    • ①광주첨단단지의 건설개요
    • ②조성배경
    • ③추진주체
    • ④추진과정
    • ⑤소결
    • ⑵부산-부산과학지방산업단지(지사과학단지) = 43
    • ①지사과학단지의 건설개요
    • ②조성배경
    • ③추진주체
    • ④추진과정
    • ⑤소결
    • ⑶인천-미디어밸리 = 58
    • ①인천 미디어밸리의 건설개요
    • ②조성배경
    • ③추진주체
    • ④추진과정
    • ⑤소결
    • ⑷세 사례 비교 = 70
    • ①조성배경
    • ②추진주체
    • ③조성계획안의 비교
    • Ⅵ. 결론 = 75
    • Ⅶ. 참고문헌 = 78
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼