RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    부대체물을 목적으로 하는 종류채권의 특정 = Concentration of the debt described by class in infungible things

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82364993

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The debt described by class is one of the debt in which the debtor is bound to perform his obligation with a unspecified thing, The objective of this kind of debt is in general fungible things, but that can be infungible things, In this case, at first, the question is to distinguish this debt described by class from the debt described by choice, This is a matter of interpretation of the declaration of intention, but in the debt described by choice, the debtor can choose an inferior article, on contrary the creditor can choose the superior article, This is not reasonable, So in obscure case, it should be presumed that the debt was described by class in which, according to the article 375 of Korean Civil Code, the debt he shall deliver a thing of average kind and value, For the performance this kind of debt, the objectives should be concentrated, The article 375 of Korean Civil Code has two standards to concentrate the debtor has done whatever is necessary for the performance of that debt, or he has designated the objective under the consent of the creditor, When the debtor does not this, if the objectives described by class are fungibles, the creditor can, in practice, execute his credit with a judgement of compensation in substitutes to be paid in money, But if the objectives described by class are infungibles, the creditor can not use this way, because there is no legal reason, So Korean Supreme Court sentenced that, in this case, the regulation of the article 380 of Korean Civil Code concerning the right to choose in the debt described by choice can be analogized, But this is not reasonable, because, above mentioned, this way can affect the interests of person exercising the right to choose, and because the debt described by infungibles is a type of the debt of infungible act executed by indirect
    compulsory execution,
    번역하기

    The debt described by class is one of the debt in which the debtor is bound to perform his obligation with a unspecified thing, The objective of this kind of debt is in general fungible things, but that can be infungible things, In this case, at first...

    The debt described by class is one of the debt in which the debtor is bound to perform his obligation with a unspecified thing, The objective of this kind of debt is in general fungible things, but that can be infungible things, In this case, at first, the question is to distinguish this debt described by class from the debt described by choice, This is a matter of interpretation of the declaration of intention, but in the debt described by choice, the debtor can choose an inferior article, on contrary the creditor can choose the superior article, This is not reasonable, So in obscure case, it should be presumed that the debt was described by class in which, according to the article 375 of Korean Civil Code, the debt he shall deliver a thing of average kind and value, For the performance this kind of debt, the objectives should be concentrated, The article 375 of Korean Civil Code has two standards to concentrate the debtor has done whatever is necessary for the performance of that debt, or he has designated the objective under the consent of the creditor, When the debtor does not this, if the objectives described by class are fungibles, the creditor can, in practice, execute his credit with a judgement of compensation in substitutes to be paid in money, But if the objectives described by class are infungibles, the creditor can not use this way, because there is no legal reason, So Korean Supreme Court sentenced that, in this case, the regulation of the article 380 of Korean Civil Code concerning the right to choose in the debt described by choice can be analogized, But this is not reasonable, because, above mentioned, this way can affect the interests of person exercising the right to choose, and because the debt described by infungibles is a type of the debt of infungible act executed by indirect
    compulsory execution,

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론
    • II. 본론
    • III. 결론
    • I. 서론
    • II. 본론
    • III. 결론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼