일본 공무원의 노동기본권과 노동조합 - 입법 논의의 검토를 중심으로 - = The fundamental rights to labor of the public employee and labor union in Japan : focus on the study of the legislation argument

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In Japan, the Supreme Court has concentrated on the theory of interpretation of the Constitution in the case of the post – strike liability of civil servants who are prohibited from engaging in industrial action, and has accumulated legal logic on the limitation of basic labor rights in a way that changes its own logic. As such, in Japan, fundamental rights to labor of the public employee was the subject of important issues that span not only the constitution but also Labor Union Law and administrative law.
In the reform of the public service system, which has been in full swing since the 2000s, fundamental rights to labor of the public employee have received attention in Japan. In particular, November 20, 2002, the ILO Board of Governors expressed the freedom of association, stating that it violates ILO Fundamental Conventions No. 87 and No. 98, which has already been ratified by Labor Relations Adjustment Law of Japanese civil servants, and recommended that the system is improved in accordance with the Convention. Adopted the Commission's report. Therefore, the focus of discussion on the fundamental rights of public servants in Japan is the re-establishment of Civil Servant Law in compliance with Article 28 of the Japanese Constitution and ILO Conventions 87 and 98 on the premise of the Supreme Court's case law.
In Korea, the founding constitution in 1948, in principle, did not restrict the fundamental rights to labor of the public employee, but they could not discuss the basic labor rights of the public officials due to division and war. In 1962, as a military regime came into being, basic labor rights were totally denied to a general public employee in accordance with Article 33 (2) of the Constitution and Article 66 of the National Public Service Act.
The two countries are: ① guaranteeing fundamental rights to labor by seeing the public employee as workers in the Constitution; ② the legal system of labor relations is very similar; and ③ there is little difference in the constitutionality of restricting the fundamental rights to labor(right to strike). Since the democratization of Korea, January 28, 2006, the act of public officials' trade unions was enacted to lay the foundations for the formation of labor-management relations among civil servants. However, there are many challenges related to the ratification of the ILO Fundamental Conventions. It is when we need to make efforts to reduce our trial and error by taking advantage of Japan 's experience.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 노상헌, "노동조합 자격심사제도의 재검토― 일본법과의 비교 검토를 중심으로 ―" 한국노동법학회 (51) : 127-165, 2014

2 이광택, "공무원노조법의 내용과 과제" 한국사회법학회 (8) : 141-178, 2007

3 和田 肇, "雇用終了と労働基本権" 旬報社 2014

4 松岡三郎, "連合国対日労働方策" 19 (19): 1949

5 松岡三郎, "第二次大戦直後の労働立法の命運" 71 (71): 1999

6 東京大学 労働法研究会, "注釈労働組合法(上)" 有斐閣 1980

7 横山源之助, "日本の下層社会" 岩波書店 1949

8 山川隆一, "日本における公務員の労働基本権問題" 한국노동법학회 (36) : 1-58, 2010

9 竹前栄治, "戦後労働改革―ＧＨＱ労働政策史" 東京大学出版会 1982

10 橋詰洋三, "我国における団結権抑制の法構造ー資格審査制度と登録制度" 13 (13): 1978

11 和田肇, "国家公務員労働関係システムの大転換とその課題" (1043) : 2012

12 武井寛, "国家公務員労働組合の法的性格" (1043) : 2012

13 大内伸哉, "労働者代表法制に関する研究" 有斐閣 2007

14 日本 労働 政策研究·研修機構, "労働組合法立法史料研究(解題篇)" 2014

15 山口浩一朗, "労働組合法" 有斐閣 1996

16 西谷敏, "労働組合法" 有斐閣 2006

17 鈴木芳明, "労働組合と法" 62 (62): 2010

18 石井照久, "労働法総論" 有斐閣 1957

19 竹前栄治, "労働法·労働運動史講義資料"

20 片岡昇, "労働法(1)" 有斐閣 1998

21 外尾健一, "労働団体法" 筑摩書房 1975

22 菅野和夫, "公共部門労働法" 32 (32): 1983

23 原田賢司, "ジュリスト増刊 労働法の争点" 有斐閣 1990

24 原昌登, "なぜ従業員全員が加入している組織が労働組合とならないのか" (585) : 2009

25 菅野和夫, "「財政民主主義と団体交渉権」覚書" 有斐閣 2 : 1983

26 정인섭, "1949년 일본 노동조합법 개정" (3) : 1993