RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    중학교 2학년 「전기」단원에서 순환학습 수업 전략의 개발 및 적용 효과 = The Development and Application Effect of Learning Cycle Model on 「Electricity」Section of Middle School Science2

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75064286

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of learning cycle model on the middle school students' improvement of s science achievement, scientific reasoning, science-related attitudes. The subject participated in this study were 140 in 8th grade at a co-educational junior high school in Seoul, Korea. They randomly assigned to the control group and treatment group. The treatment group received the instruction of learning cycle approaches. The control groups received a traditional text-book oriented form of instruction that included reading, writing. They have been taught about 「Electricity」 section of middle school Science2 for 12 class periods during the second semester. Evaluation instruments used in pre-test and post-test were science achievement test, classroom test of scientific reasoning, science related attitude test. Moreover ANCOVA was done by using SPSS 10.0 statistic program.
    firstly, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about students' science achievements test by ANCOVA analysis. Especially in high level group, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of students' science achievements test for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<05). But in low level group, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about students' science achievements test. Secondly, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of scientific reasoning for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<.01). Especially in high level group, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of classroom test of scientific reasoning for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<.05). But in low level group, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about classroom test of scientific reasoning. Also in hypothetical-deductive thinking level and transitional thinking level, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of classroom test of scientific reasoning for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<.05). But in Empirical-inductive thinking, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about classroom test of scientific reasoning. Thirdly, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about science related attitude test by ANCOVA analysis. Especially in high level group, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of science related attitude test for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<.05). But in low level group, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about science related attitude test
    In conclusion, in high level group, it was found that students of treatment group received the instruction of learning cycle approaches showed much more changes positively in achievement, scientific reasoning, science-related attitudes than those of control group. The other hand, in low level group, it was found that students of control group received a traditional text-book oriented form of instruction that included reading and writing showed much more changes positively in achievement, scientific reasoning, science-related attitudes than those of treatment group.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of learning cycle model on the middle school students' improvement of s science achievement, scientific reasoning, science-related attitudes. The subject participated in this study were 140 in...

    The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of learning cycle model on the middle school students' improvement of s science achievement, scientific reasoning, science-related attitudes. The subject participated in this study were 140 in 8th grade at a co-educational junior high school in Seoul, Korea. They randomly assigned to the control group and treatment group. The treatment group received the instruction of learning cycle approaches. The control groups received a traditional text-book oriented form of instruction that included reading, writing. They have been taught about 「Electricity」 section of middle school Science2 for 12 class periods during the second semester. Evaluation instruments used in pre-test and post-test were science achievement test, classroom test of scientific reasoning, science related attitude test. Moreover ANCOVA was done by using SPSS 10.0 statistic program.
    firstly, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about students' science achievements test by ANCOVA analysis. Especially in high level group, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of students' science achievements test for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<05). But in low level group, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about students' science achievements test. Secondly, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of scientific reasoning for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<.01). Especially in high level group, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of classroom test of scientific reasoning for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<.05). But in low level group, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about classroom test of scientific reasoning. Also in hypothetical-deductive thinking level and transitional thinking level, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of classroom test of scientific reasoning for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<.05). But in Empirical-inductive thinking, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about classroom test of scientific reasoning. Thirdly, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about science related attitude test by ANCOVA analysis. Especially in high level group, the analysis by ANCOVA showed that the scores of science related attitude test for the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group(p<.05). But in low level group, there was no significant difference(p>.05) between two groups about science related attitude test
    In conclusion, in high level group, it was found that students of treatment group received the instruction of learning cycle approaches showed much more changes positively in achievement, scientific reasoning, science-related attitudes than those of control group. The other hand, in low level group, it was found that students of control group received a traditional text-book oriented form of instruction that included reading and writing showed much more changes positively in achievement, scientific reasoning, science-related attitudes than those of treatment group.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 연구 대상 및 과정
    • 1. 연구 대상
    • 2. 연구 과정
    • Ⅲ. 연구 결과 및 논의
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 연구 대상 및 과정
    • 1. 연구 대상
    • 2. 연구 과정
    • Ⅲ. 연구 결과 및 논의
    • 1. 과학 학업 성취도에 대한 효과
    • 2. 과학적 사고력에 대한 효과
    • 3. 과학과 관련된 태도에 대한 효과
    • Ⅳ. 결론 및 제언
    • 참고문헌
    • abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼