RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      수술 전 심장기능 평가에 있어 심근관류 SPECT의 유용성 = The Usefulness of Cardiac SPECT for the Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19638767

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: The preoperative cardiac evaluation is important to predict perioperative cardiac event in patients who planned for non-cardiac operation. However, the usefulness of cardiac SPECT and/or evaluation of patient with clinical criteria is not clear. Therefore we evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac SPECT in surgical patients. And also compare the result of clinical risk stratification using the ACC/AHA guidelines with those of cardiac SPECT.
      Methods: 75 patients(M:F=31:44, 62.8±9.2 years), who have chest pain, EKG abnormality or history of ischemic heart disease were enrolled to the study. According to the result of cardiac SPECT, they were divided to 3 groups: normal perfusion(n=51), reversible perfusion defect(n=31), irreversible perfusion defect(n=3). Also we divided 3 groups according to clinical predictors of the ACC/AHA guidelines: minor risk group(n=51), intermediate risk group(n=21), and major risk group(n=3). I compare predictive power of perioperative cardiac event between cardiac SPECT and clinical predictors of the ACC/AHA guidelines.
      Results: Cardiac event occurred in 9.2% of patient. Prevalence of cardiac event in reversible cardiac perfusion group(19.0%) and irreversible cardiac perfusion group(33.3%) was higher than normal group(3.8%)(p〈0.05). By clinical predictors according to the ACC/AHA guidelines, I could not predict the postoperative cardiac event.
      Conclusion: Cardiac SPECT is more useful than clinical predictors according to the ACC/AHA guidelines in preoperative cardiac evaluation in patients with chest pain, EKG abnormality or history of ischemic heart disease.
      번역하기

      Background/Aims: The preoperative cardiac evaluation is important to predict perioperative cardiac event in patients who planned for non-cardiac operation. However, the usefulness of cardiac SPECT and/or evaluation of patient with clinical criteria is...

      Background/Aims: The preoperative cardiac evaluation is important to predict perioperative cardiac event in patients who planned for non-cardiac operation. However, the usefulness of cardiac SPECT and/or evaluation of patient with clinical criteria is not clear. Therefore we evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac SPECT in surgical patients. And also compare the result of clinical risk stratification using the ACC/AHA guidelines with those of cardiac SPECT.
      Methods: 75 patients(M:F=31:44, 62.8±9.2 years), who have chest pain, EKG abnormality or history of ischemic heart disease were enrolled to the study. According to the result of cardiac SPECT, they were divided to 3 groups: normal perfusion(n=51), reversible perfusion defect(n=31), irreversible perfusion defect(n=3). Also we divided 3 groups according to clinical predictors of the ACC/AHA guidelines: minor risk group(n=51), intermediate risk group(n=21), and major risk group(n=3). I compare predictive power of perioperative cardiac event between cardiac SPECT and clinical predictors of the ACC/AHA guidelines.
      Results: Cardiac event occurred in 9.2% of patient. Prevalence of cardiac event in reversible cardiac perfusion group(19.0%) and irreversible cardiac perfusion group(33.3%) was higher than normal group(3.8%)(p〈0.05). By clinical predictors according to the ACC/AHA guidelines, I could not predict the postoperative cardiac event.
      Conclusion: Cardiac SPECT is more useful than clinical predictors according to the ACC/AHA guidelines in preoperative cardiac evaluation in patients with chest pain, EKG abnormality or history of ischemic heart disease.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼