RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    절대적 타자성과 책임에 대한 소고-데리다의 종교이해를 중심으로- = Essay on the absolute alterity and responsibility -Around the Derrida’s religious understanding-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107142274

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The main purpose of this article is to explain the meaning of the religious in the Derrida’s thought. Derrida makes the distinction relegere and religare in the definition of religion. The one means holiness, separation, and the other means union. It is important to understand not only the dimension of separation, but also the dimension of union of God and man. Derrida, in the lecture of Fear and Trembling, asserts that the religious subject determined by the pious interpretation of Kierkegaard on Abraham could acquire the status of ethical subjectivity by responding to the infinite demand of the wholly other. But in order to respond to this demand addressed to the subject, he has to interrupt all relationship to other persons and to concentrate on the absolutely other. In regard with the other in the correlation of call and response, Derrida defines its absolute alterity as being beyond the knowledge and the power of subject. The problem here is how to define the other freed from knowledge. Some scholars, thus, characterize Derrida's alterity as negative theology. However, Derrida believes that the non-knowledge and indeterminacy of an absolutely other can not only be interpreted as a personal being like God , but as a Khora, an absolute meaningless existence. Through this concept of Khora, Derrida seeks to distance himself from the theological and anthropological traditions of understanding the other. We want to explain his concept of alterity through this trajectory of Derrida's thought.
    번역하기

    The main purpose of this article is to explain the meaning of the religious in the Derrida’s thought. Derrida makes the distinction relegere and religare in the definition of religion. The one means holiness, separation, and the other means union. I...

    The main purpose of this article is to explain the meaning of the religious in the Derrida’s thought. Derrida makes the distinction relegere and religare in the definition of religion. The one means holiness, separation, and the other means union. It is important to understand not only the dimension of separation, but also the dimension of union of God and man. Derrida, in the lecture of Fear and Trembling, asserts that the religious subject determined by the pious interpretation of Kierkegaard on Abraham could acquire the status of ethical subjectivity by responding to the infinite demand of the wholly other. But in order to respond to this demand addressed to the subject, he has to interrupt all relationship to other persons and to concentrate on the absolutely other. In regard with the other in the correlation of call and response, Derrida defines its absolute alterity as being beyond the knowledge and the power of subject. The problem here is how to define the other freed from knowledge. Some scholars, thus, characterize Derrida's alterity as negative theology. However, Derrida believes that the non-knowledge and indeterminacy of an absolutely other can not only be interpreted as a personal being like God , but as a Khora, an absolute meaningless existence. Through this concept of Khora, Derrida seeks to distance himself from the theological and anthropological traditions of understanding the other. We want to explain his concept of alterity through this trajectory of Derrida's thought.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김이석, "후기구조주의의 종교철학적 가능성연구: 존 카푸토(John D. Caputo)의 자크 데리다(Jacques Derrida) 연구 중심으로" 종교문제연구소 (32) : 29-60, 2017

    2 허유선, "칸트 윤리학의 행위자 중심성과 공동체 윤리로서의 효력 - 자율적 행위자와 책임귀속 효과를 중심으로" 동서사상연구소 (19) : 1-34, 2015

    3 신정아, "신앙과 지식 : 세기와 용서" 아카넷 2016

    4 에마뉘엘 레비나스, "신, 죽음, 시간" 그린비 2013

    5 "성서"

    6 자크 데리다, "불량배들. 이성에 관한 두 편의 에세이" 휴머니스트 2003

    7 Michel Lisse, "Éric Hoppenot et Alain Milon" Presses universitaires de Paris Nanterre 2008

    8 John D. Caputo, "The Weakness of God : A Theology of the Event" Indiana University Press 2006

    9 John D. Caputo, "The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida : Religion without Religion" Indiana University Press 1997

    10 John Milbank, "The Blackwell Companion to Postmodern Theology" Wiley-Blackwell 2002

    1 김이석, "후기구조주의의 종교철학적 가능성연구: 존 카푸토(John D. Caputo)의 자크 데리다(Jacques Derrida) 연구 중심으로" 종교문제연구소 (32) : 29-60, 2017

    2 허유선, "칸트 윤리학의 행위자 중심성과 공동체 윤리로서의 효력 - 자율적 행위자와 책임귀속 효과를 중심으로" 동서사상연구소 (19) : 1-34, 2015

    3 신정아, "신앙과 지식 : 세기와 용서" 아카넷 2016

    4 에마뉘엘 레비나스, "신, 죽음, 시간" 그린비 2013

    5 "성서"

    6 자크 데리다, "불량배들. 이성에 관한 두 편의 에세이" 휴머니스트 2003

    7 Michel Lisse, "Éric Hoppenot et Alain Milon" Presses universitaires de Paris Nanterre 2008

    8 John D. Caputo, "The Weakness of God : A Theology of the Event" Indiana University Press 2006

    9 John D. Caputo, "The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida : Religion without Religion" Indiana University Press 1997

    10 John Milbank, "The Blackwell Companion to Postmodern Theology" Wiley-Blackwell 2002

    11 Jacques Derrida, "Sauf le nom" Galilée 2006

    12 Jacques Derrida, "Psyché, Invention de l’autre" Galilée 1987

    13 Jacques Derrida, "On the name" Stanford University 1997

    14 John W. P. Phillips, "Loving love or ethics as natural philosophy in Jacques Derrida's Politiques de l'Amitie'" 12 (12): 2007

    15 Jacques Derrida, "Le dernier des Juifs" Galilée 2014

    16 A., Chouraqui, "La Bible" Desclée De Brouwer 2007

    17 Jacques Derrida, "Khôra" Galilée 2006

    18 Jean-Luc Marion, "God, the Gift and Postmodernisme" Indiana University Press 1999

    19 John D. Caputo, "God, the Gift and Postmodernisme" Indiana University Press 1999

    20 Jan Patočka, "Essais hérétiques: Sur la philosophie de l’histoire" Editions Verdier 2007

    21 Mark C. Taylor, "Erring : A Postmodern A/theology" University of Chicago Press 2008

    22 Jacques Derrida, "Donner le temps" Galilée 1991

    23 Jacques Derrida, "Donner la mort" Galilée 1999

    24 Jean-Luc Marion, "Dieu sans l'être" PUF 1991

    25 Jacques Derrida, "Derrida and Religion: Other Testaments" Routledge 2005

    26 Tyler Roberts, "Derrida and Religion: Other Testaments" Routledge 2005

    27 Jean-Luc Marion, "Au Nom. Comment ne pas parler de ‘théologie négative’" Érudit 55 (55): 1999

    28 Jacques Derrida, "Abraham's Melancholy : An interview with Michal Ben-Naftali" 39 : 2017

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.38 0.38 0.3
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.28 0.23 0.863 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼