RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) of South Korea’s North Korean Cooperation Policy : Focusing on North Korean Development Cooperation and Economic Cooperation Policy

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14817024

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As the world economy is becoming more interdependent, countries become more prone to influences from domestic as well as foreign policies of other states. The problem of interdependency is that, development interests of developing countries are easily undermined by developed countries regardless of whether they intended or not. Therefore, demands for coordination of policies with global development goals have been raised constantly. Out of this context, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has proposed a concept of policy coherence for development (PCD). The general objective of PCD is to enhance coherence between development policies and other policies with regards to the development objectives. The importance of PCD has been continuously emphasized by the OECD, and OECD DAC member countries’ progress in PCD is examined through peer reviews. South Korea’s PCD in development policies has also been reviewed in its 2012 DAC peer review, and was given recommendations for improvement. However, since South Korea’s North Korean aid policies are not classified as ODA, PCD is a relatively new concept in its North Korean policies. Given the fact that South Korea has been one of the largest donors and trade partners of North Korea in the past two decades, policy coherence and considerations for North Korea’s development objectives are necessary. In aid of that, this thesis evaluated the PCD of ROK’s North Korean development policies, with a focus on the policy coherence between aid and non-aid policies. Through the research, it was concluded that despite the existence of policy coherence in North Korean policies, South Korea lacks concerns for DPRK’s development objectives. In other words, South Korea’s policies towards North Korea do not fulfil the standards of policy coherence for development, and improvements are needed, particularly in terms of promoting development interests of its neighbour in the North.
    번역하기

    As the world economy is becoming more interdependent, countries become more prone to influences from domestic as well as foreign policies of other states. The problem of interdependency is that, development interests of developing countries are easily...

    As the world economy is becoming more interdependent, countries become more prone to influences from domestic as well as foreign policies of other states. The problem of interdependency is that, development interests of developing countries are easily undermined by developed countries regardless of whether they intended or not. Therefore, demands for coordination of policies with global development goals have been raised constantly. Out of this context, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has proposed a concept of policy coherence for development (PCD). The general objective of PCD is to enhance coherence between development policies and other policies with regards to the development objectives. The importance of PCD has been continuously emphasized by the OECD, and OECD DAC member countries’ progress in PCD is examined through peer reviews. South Korea’s PCD in development policies has also been reviewed in its 2012 DAC peer review, and was given recommendations for improvement. However, since South Korea’s North Korean aid policies are not classified as ODA, PCD is a relatively new concept in its North Korean policies. Given the fact that South Korea has been one of the largest donors and trade partners of North Korea in the past two decades, policy coherence and considerations for North Korea’s development objectives are necessary. In aid of that, this thesis evaluated the PCD of ROK’s North Korean development policies, with a focus on the policy coherence between aid and non-aid policies. Through the research, it was concluded that despite the existence of policy coherence in North Korean policies, South Korea lacks concerns for DPRK’s development objectives. In other words, South Korea’s policies towards North Korea do not fulfil the standards of policy coherence for development, and improvements are needed, particularly in terms of promoting development interests of its neighbour in the North.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. Introduction 1
    • II. Literature Review 4
    • III. Methodology 8
    • IV. Backgrounds 11
    • 1. Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) 11
    • I. Introduction 1
    • II. Literature Review 4
    • III. Methodology 8
    • IV. Backgrounds 11
    • 1. Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) 11
    • 1-1. Concept of PCD 11
    • 1-2. Policy Coherence Cycle 16
    • 1-3. Implications of PCD 18
    • 2. Coherence of the ROK's Overall Development Policies 21
    • 3. PCD of South Korea's North Korean Policies 24
    • V. South Korea's Cooperation Policy towards North Korea 27
    • 1. Overview of South Korea's North Korean Policy 28
    • 2. South Korea's Aid Policies: Development Cooperation Policies 32
    • 2-1. Case 1: Bilateral Aid 37
    • 2-2. Case 2: Contributions to Multilateral Institutions 42
    • 3. South Koreas Non-Aid Policies: Economic Cooperation Policies 47
    • 3-1. Case 3: Kaesong Industrial Complex (KIC) 51
    • VI. Analysis on Policy Coherence of the ROK's North Korean Cooperation Policies 56
    • 1. Why is PCD Necessary? 58
    • 2. Phase 1: Setting and Prioritizing Objectives 63
    • 3. Phase 2: Co-ordinating Policy and its Implementation 67
    • 4. Phase 3: Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting 78
    • 5. Policy Coherence for Development 84
    • VII. Conclusion 86
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼