RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      The Necessity of Finite Modes in Spinoza

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108737142

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      It is standard to think that in Spinoza’s system, all things are necessary and in no sense contingent. However, in his classic book, Spinoza’s Metaphysics, published in 1969, Edwin Curley argues based on the proposition 28 of the first part of the Ethics that Spinoza endorses necessitarianism of only a modest kind, according to which when it comes to finite modes, there is a sense in which they are contingent. In this paper, I revisit Curley’s argument. Commentators have responded to Curley’s argument, showing that Spinoza’s remarks on infinite modes entail that finite modes can in no sense be contingent. But this alone falls short of dispelling Curley’s misgivings about the standard interpretation, for it remains unexplained why Curley is wrong in thinking that the proposition 28 supports his moderate necessitarian interpretation. In defense of the standard interpretation, I bolster the usual response to Curley in greater detail than has been done in the literature and explain why, pace Curley, the proposition 28 plays no evidential role in support of Curley’s interpretation.
      번역하기

      It is standard to think that in Spinoza’s system, all things are necessary and in no sense contingent. However, in his classic book, Spinoza’s Metaphysics, published in 1969, Edwin Curley argues based on the proposition 28 of the first part of the...

      It is standard to think that in Spinoza’s system, all things are necessary and in no sense contingent. However, in his classic book, Spinoza’s Metaphysics, published in 1969, Edwin Curley argues based on the proposition 28 of the first part of the Ethics that Spinoza endorses necessitarianism of only a modest kind, according to which when it comes to finite modes, there is a sense in which they are contingent. In this paper, I revisit Curley’s argument. Commentators have responded to Curley’s argument, showing that Spinoza’s remarks on infinite modes entail that finite modes can in no sense be contingent. But this alone falls short of dispelling Curley’s misgivings about the standard interpretation, for it remains unexplained why Curley is wrong in thinking that the proposition 28 supports his moderate necessitarian interpretation. In defense of the standard interpretation, I bolster the usual response to Curley in greater detail than has been done in the literature and explain why, pace Curley, the proposition 28 plays no evidential role in support of Curley’s interpretation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lowe, J., "Two Notions of Being : Entity and Essence" 62 : 23-48, 2008

      2 Della Rocca, M., "The Power of an Idea: Spinoza’s Critique of Pure Will" 37 : 200-231, 2003

      3 Della Rocca, M., "The Parmenidean Ascent" Oxford University Press 2020

      4 Martin, C., "The Framework of Essences in Spinoza’s Ethics" 16 (16): 489-509, 2008

      5 McDaniel, K., "The Fragmentation of Being" Oxford University Press 2017

      6 Morgan, M., "The Essential Spinoza: Ethics and Related Writings" Hackett Publishing Company 2006

      7 Garrett, D., "The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics" Cambridge University Press 2009

      8 Laerke, M., "The Actual and the Possible" Oxford University Press 2017

      9 Hempel, C. G., "Studies in the Logic of Explanation" 15 (15): 135-175, 1945

      10 Melamed, Y., "Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought" Oxford University Press 2013

      1 Lowe, J., "Two Notions of Being : Entity and Essence" 62 : 23-48, 2008

      2 Della Rocca, M., "The Power of an Idea: Spinoza’s Critique of Pure Will" 37 : 200-231, 2003

      3 Della Rocca, M., "The Parmenidean Ascent" Oxford University Press 2020

      4 Martin, C., "The Framework of Essences in Spinoza’s Ethics" 16 (16): 489-509, 2008

      5 McDaniel, K., "The Fragmentation of Being" Oxford University Press 2017

      6 Morgan, M., "The Essential Spinoza: Ethics and Related Writings" Hackett Publishing Company 2006

      7 Garrett, D., "The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics" Cambridge University Press 2009

      8 Laerke, M., "The Actual and the Possible" Oxford University Press 2017

      9 Hempel, C. G., "Studies in the Logic of Explanation" 15 (15): 135-175, 1945

      10 Melamed, Y., "Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought" Oxford University Press 2013

      11 Curley, E., "Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation" Harvard University Press 1969

      12 Melamed, Y., "Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Substance : The Substance-Mode Relation as a Relation of Inherence and Predication" 78 : 17-82, 2009

      13 Schmaltz, T., "Spinoza’s Mediate Infinite Mode" 35 : 199-235, 1997

      14 Viljanen, V., "Spinoza’s Geometry of Power" Cambridge University Press 2011

      15 Carriero, J., "Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide" Cambridge University Press 2013

      16 Barbone, S., "Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes" Oxford University Press 89-112, 2002

      17 Viljanen, V., "Spinoza's Essentialist Model of Causation" 51 : 412-437, 2008

      18 Ward, T., "Spinoza on the Essences of Modes" 19 : 19-46, 2011

      19 Hübner, K., "Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason" 97 : 58-88, 2015

      20 Zylstra, S., "Spinoza on Action and Immanent Causation" 102 : 29-55, 2020

      21 Della Rocca, M., "Spinoza" Routledge 2008

      22 Della Rocca, M., "Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza" Oxford University Press 1996

      23 Pasnau, R., "Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate" Oxford University Press 2011

      24 Della Rocca, M., "Philosophers’ Imprint 10" 2010

      25 Huenemann, C., "Oxford Handbook of Spinoza" Oxford University Press 114-132, 2018

      26 Carriero, J., "On the Relationship between Mode and Substance in Spinoza’s Metaphysics" 33 : 245-273, 1995

      27 Curley, E., "New Essays on the Rationalists" Oxford University Press 1998

      28 Carriero, J., "Mind, Body, and Morality: New Perspectives on Descartes and Spinoza" Routledge 2019

      29 Miller, P. Lee, "Introductory Readings in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy" Hackett Publishing Company 2015

      30 Garrett, D., "Interpreting Spinoza:Critical Essays" Cambridge University Press 2008

      31 Wilson, M., "Infinite Understanding, Scientia Intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16" 8 (8): 181-191, 1983

      32 Garrett, D., "God and Nature in Spinoza’s Metaphysics" Brill 1991

      33 Han, S., "From the Analogy of Being to Modes of Being?" 179 : 3133-3139, 2022

      34 Han, S., "Essence and Thisness" 13 : 166-212, 2023

      35 Oderberg, D., "Essence and Properties" 75 : 85-111, 2011

      36 Fine, K., "Essence and Modality" 8 : 1-16, 1994

      37 Koslicki, K., "Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics" Cambridge University Press 187-206, 2012

      38 Matthews, G., "Aristotle on Existence" 40 : 233-238, 1995

      39 Brandom, R., "Adequacy and the Individuation of Ideas in Spinoza’s Ethics" 14 : 147-162, 1976

      40 Curley, E., "A Spinoza Reader: the Ethics and Other Works" Princeton University Press 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼