RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      임플란트 보철의 abutment 유무에 따른 유한 요소법적 응력분석 = Finite Element Stress Analysis of Implant Supported Prosthesis with or without Abutment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19700865

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The attraction to endosseous implants lies in the potential for improved function, improved esthetic, and more favorable stress distribution in the superior prostheses, fixture, and supporting bone. Implant for single tooth replace is especially neede...

      The attraction to endosseous implants lies in the potential for improved function, improved esthetic, and more favorable stress distribution in the superior prostheses, fixture, and supporting bone. Implant for single tooth replace is especially needed esthetics, and that was mainly established by use of various superstructure.
      The purpose of this study was to compare the stresses in implant prosthesis and fixture, and supporting bone according to with or without abutment between fixture and superstructure.
      Using the finite element method, this study modeled 4.0×14㎜ cylindrical type implant fixture with the external hexed type of 0.75㎜, and two models are completed. Model A is without abutment, so implant superstructure is direct connected in fixture, and Model B is with abutment on the fixture. The vertical load of 200N and 30°lateral load of 100N were applied at the cusp tip of the prostheses.
      The results were as follows ;
      1. Under vertical and lateral loading, the amount of displacement was larger at the model B with abutment than at the model A without abutment.
      2. Under vertical and lateral loading, less equivalent stress was represented at the model B with abutment than at the model A without abutment.
      3. Under vertical and lateral loading, model B with abutment showed more stress in fastening screw than at the model A without abutment.
      4. Under vertical and lateral loading, model B with abutment showed less stress distribution in fastening screw than at the model A without abutment.
      As the results of this study, in case of using abutment between implant fixture and final prostheses, large displacement is occured and the stresses is concentrated at the fastening screw.
      The other hand, when the implant superstructure is direct conected to implant fixture without abutment, less displacement is occured and the streses is widely distributed to the supporting bone. That results mean intermittent abutment acts stress blocker and when the use of abutment, fasening screw fracture more occured than supporting bone resorption.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 연구재료 및 방법
      • Ⅲ. 연구결과
      • Ⅳ. 총괄 및 고안
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 연구재료 및 방법
      • Ⅲ. 연구결과
      • Ⅳ. 총괄 및 고안
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼