RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    The Contingent Effect of Marketing Alliances on Firm Profitability

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103950842

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Forming interfirm collaborative relationships has become a key aspect of a firm's marketing strategies to create value for customers and achieve greater firm performance. While empirical findings are mixed in previous studies, this study is an effort to identify boundary conditions for the benefits of marketing alliances. We investigate internal and environmental factors that may magnify or constrain the effect of marketing alliances on firm profitability. Given the complementary relationship between marketing and R&D activities, we focus on a firm's R&D intensity as an internal factor that may magnify the value of marketing alliances for firm performance. For environmental factors, we focus on industry turbulence and industry competitiveness. Industry turbulence refers to the degree to which industry market conditions change quickly and unpredictably, whereas industry competitiveness refers to the degree to which a firm faces competition in the industry. By testing these factors, we are intended to reveal boundary conditions that determine the value of marketing alliances for firm profitability. The analysis of firms in the diverse industries shows that while the main effect of marketing alliances on firm profitability is not significant, it becomes more positive when R&D investment is more intensive or when industry environment is more turbulent. The results of this study imply that just forming more marketing alliances may not be enough to increase firm profitability. Our findings imply that marketing alliances become more effective in a dynamically changing industry environment. That is, firms can cope with industry uncertainties more effectively by forming marketing alliances. At the same time, the moderating effect of R&D intensity implies that the internal investments in R&D magnify the effect of marketing alliances on firm profitability. The findings of this study contributes to the existing alliance literature in three aspects. First, this study enhances our understanding of the contingent value of marketing alliances by testing both internal and external factors that may influence the effectiveness of marketing alliances. Second, this study responds to the need for research that investigates actual performance resulting from interfirm relationships. Third, while previous studies primarily focused on a specific industry, this study extend previous findings of the boundary conditions for the benefits of marketing alliances in a broader context.
    번역하기

    Forming interfirm collaborative relationships has become a key aspect of a firm's marketing strategies to create value for customers and achieve greater firm performance. While empirical findings are mixed in previous studies, this study is an effort ...

    Forming interfirm collaborative relationships has become a key aspect of a firm's marketing strategies to create value for customers and achieve greater firm performance. While empirical findings are mixed in previous studies, this study is an effort to identify boundary conditions for the benefits of marketing alliances. We investigate internal and environmental factors that may magnify or constrain the effect of marketing alliances on firm profitability. Given the complementary relationship between marketing and R&D activities, we focus on a firm's R&D intensity as an internal factor that may magnify the value of marketing alliances for firm performance. For environmental factors, we focus on industry turbulence and industry competitiveness. Industry turbulence refers to the degree to which industry market conditions change quickly and unpredictably, whereas industry competitiveness refers to the degree to which a firm faces competition in the industry. By testing these factors, we are intended to reveal boundary conditions that determine the value of marketing alliances for firm profitability. The analysis of firms in the diverse industries shows that while the main effect of marketing alliances on firm profitability is not significant, it becomes more positive when R&D investment is more intensive or when industry environment is more turbulent. The results of this study imply that just forming more marketing alliances may not be enough to increase firm profitability. Our findings imply that marketing alliances become more effective in a dynamically changing industry environment. That is, firms can cope with industry uncertainties more effectively by forming marketing alliances. At the same time, the moderating effect of R&D intensity implies that the internal investments in R&D magnify the effect of marketing alliances on firm profitability. The findings of this study contributes to the existing alliance literature in three aspects. First, this study enhances our understanding of the contingent value of marketing alliances by testing both internal and external factors that may influence the effectiveness of marketing alliances. Second, this study responds to the need for research that investigates actual performance resulting from interfirm relationships. Third, while previous studies primarily focused on a specific industry, this study extend previous findings of the boundary conditions for the benefits of marketing alliances in a broader context.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Jap, Sandy D., "‘Pie-Expansion' Efforts : Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships" 36 (36): 461-475, 1999

    2 Luo, Xueming, "Working with Rivals : The Impact of Competitor Alliances on Financial Performance" 44 (44): 73-83, 2007

    3 Ellegaard, Chris, "Value Appropriation in Business Exchange – Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities" 29 (29): 185-198, 2014

    4 Hagedoorn, John, "Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences" 14 : 371-385, 1993

    5 Anderson, Erin, "The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels" 29 (29): 18-34, 1992

    6 Anand, Bharat N., "The Structure of Licensing Contracts" 48 (48): 103-135, 2000

    7 Cui, Anna Shaojie, "The Influence of Competitive Intensity and Market Dynamism on Knowledge Management Capabilities of Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries" 13 (13): 32-53, 2005

    8 Fabrizio, Kira R., "The Impact of Local Demand on Innovation in a Global Industry" 33 (33): 42-64, 2012

    9 Moorman, Christine, "The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development" 36 (36): 239-257, 1999

    10 Lee, Jongkuk, "The Alignment of Contract Terms for Knowledge-Creating and Knowledge-Appropriating Relationship Portfolios" 75 (75): 110-127, 2011

    1 Jap, Sandy D., "‘Pie-Expansion' Efforts : Collaboration Processes in Buyer-Supplier Relationships" 36 (36): 461-475, 1999

    2 Luo, Xueming, "Working with Rivals : The Impact of Competitor Alliances on Financial Performance" 44 (44): 73-83, 2007

    3 Ellegaard, Chris, "Value Appropriation in Business Exchange – Literature Review and Future Research Opportunities" 29 (29): 185-198, 2014

    4 Hagedoorn, John, "Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences" 14 : 371-385, 1993

    5 Anderson, Erin, "The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels" 29 (29): 18-34, 1992

    6 Anand, Bharat N., "The Structure of Licensing Contracts" 48 (48): 103-135, 2000

    7 Cui, Anna Shaojie, "The Influence of Competitive Intensity and Market Dynamism on Knowledge Management Capabilities of Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries" 13 (13): 32-53, 2005

    8 Fabrizio, Kira R., "The Impact of Local Demand on Innovation in a Global Industry" 33 (33): 42-64, 2012

    9 Moorman, Christine, "The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development" 36 (36): 239-257, 1999

    10 Lee, Jongkuk, "The Alignment of Contract Terms for Knowledge-Creating and Knowledge-Appropriating Relationship Portfolios" 75 (75): 110-127, 2011

    11 Hausman, J. A., "Specification Tests in Econometrics" 46 (46): 1251-1271, 1978

    12 Bonner, Joseph M., "Selecting Influential Business-to-Business Customers in New Product Development : Relational Embeddedness and Knowledge Heterogeneity Considerations" 21 (21): 155-169, 2004

    13 Damodaran, Aswath, "Return on Capital (Roc), Return on Invested Capital (Roic) and Return on Equity (Roe)" Measurement and Implications 2007

    14 Wuyts, Stefan, "Portfolios of Interfirm Agreements in Technology-Intensive Markets : Consequences for Innovation and Profitability" 68 (68): 88-100, 2004

    15 Golder, Peter N., "Pioneer Advantage : Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend?" 30 (30): 158-170, 1993

    16 King, David R., "Performance Implications of Firm Resource Interactions in the Acquisition of R&D-Intensive Firms" 19 (19): 327-340, 2008

    17 Bae, Jonghoon, "Partner Substitutability, Alliance Network Structure, and Firm Profitability in the Telecommunications Industry" 47 (47): 843-859, 2004

    18 Dwyer, F. Robert, "Output Sector Munificence Effects on the Internal Political Economy of Marketing Channels" 24 (24): 347-358, 1987

    19 Bucklin, Louis P., "Organizing Successful Co-Marketing Alliances" 57 : 32-46, 1993

    20 Podolny, Joel M., "Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Markets" 107 : 33-60, 2001

    21 Aiken, L. S., "Multiple Regression : Testing and Interpreting Interaction." Sage 1991

    22 Song, Michael, "Marketing and Technology Resource Complementarity : An Analysis of Their Interaction Effect in Two Environmental Contexts" 26 (26): 259-276, 2005

    23 Swaminathan, Vanitha, "Marketing Alliances, Firm Networks, and Firm Value Creation" 73 (73): 52-69, 2009

    24 Kohli, Ajay K, "Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications" 1-18, 1990

    25 Jaworski, Bernard J., "Market Orientation : Antecedents and Consequences" 57 (57): 53-70, 1993

    26 Lin, Chih-Pin, "Maker-Buyer Strategic Alliances : An Integrated Framework" 25 (25): 43-56, 2009

    27 Hoang, H., "Leveraging Internal and External Experience : Exploration, Exploitation, and R&D Project Performance" 31 (31): 734-758, 2010

    28 Koh, Jeongsuk, "Joint Venture Formation and Stock Market Reactions : An Assessment in the Information Technology Sector" 34 (34): 869-892, 1991

    29 Stuart, Toby E., "Interorganizational Alliances and the Performance of Firms : A Study of Growth and Innovation Rates in a High-Technology Industry" 21 (21): 791-811, 2000

    30 Das, Somnath, "Impact of Strategic Alliances on Firm Valuation" 41 (41): 27-41, 1998

    31 Fang, Eric, "Effect of Service Transition Strategies on Firm Value" 72 (72): 1-14, 2008

    32 Wooldridge, J., "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data" MIT Press 2002

    33 Venkatesh, R., "Dynamic Co-Marketing Alliances : When and Why Do They Succeed or Fail?" 17 (17): 3-31, 2000

    34 Bello, Daniel C., "Does Accommodating a Self-Serving Partner in an International Marketing Alliance Pay Off?" 74 (74): 77-93, 2010

    35 Fang, Eric, "Customer Participation and the Trade-Off between New Product Innovativeness and Speed to Market" 72 (72): 90-104, 2008

    36 Houston, Mark B., "Buyer-Supplier Contracts Versus Joint Ventures : Determinants and Consequences of Transaction Structure" 37 (37): 1-15, 2000

    37 Grewal, Rajdeep, "Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis : The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility" 65 (65): 67-80, 2001

    38 Kalaignanam, Kartik, "Asymmetric New Product Development Alliances : Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnerships?" 53 (53): 357-374, 2007

    39 Sivadas, Eugene, "An Examination of Organizational Factors Influencing New Product Success in Internal and Alliance-Based Processes" 64 : 31-49, 2000

    40 Lavie, Dovev, "Alliance Portfolio Internationalization and Firm Performance" 19 (19): 623-646, 2008

    41 Kale, Prashant, "Alliance Capability, Stock Market Response, and Long Term Alliance Success : The Role of the Alliance Function" 23 (23): 747-767, 2002

    42 Dickinson, Sonia, "A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Results Concerning Evaluations of CoBranded Offerings" 13 (13): 393-406, 2006

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-05-10 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Marketing Association KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-05-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Asian Journal of Marketing -> Asia Marketing Journal KCI등재
    2012-02-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국마케팅저널 -> 아시아마케팅저널
    외국어명 : Korean Journal of Marketing -> Asian Journal of Marketing
    KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.1 0.1 0.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.45 0.67 0.318 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼