The household class system(戶等制) of Goryeo basically succeeded to Shilla’s system. However, it was changed into three-class system of household according to social changes during the late period of Shilla and the early period of Goryeo. The thr...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The household class system(戶等制) of Goryeo basically succeeded to Shilla’s system. However, it was changed into three-class system of household according to social changes during the late period of Shilla and the early period of Goryeo. The thr...
The household class system(戶等制) of Goryeo basically succeeded to Shilla’s system. However, it was changed into three-class system of household according to social changes during the late period of Shilla and the early period of Goryeo. The three-class system of household in Goryeo was established by modifying the five-class system of household of Song under the influence of the five-class system of household in the late period of Tang and the period of the Five Dynasties.
The household class system changed from nine-class system to the five-class system during the period of Tang and Song. This change was caused by a change of class standard according to social and economic changes during this period. The class standard of the nine-class system of household in Tang essentially depended on a financial condition. But the number of adult males(人丁) was another key factor of it. As a military system(府兵制) and a tax system of Tang no longer functioned during the late period of Tang and the period of the Five Dynasties, it was necessary to establish New systems.
The purpose of household class system was to assign public service(職役) and to impose a tax according to financial status of each household. In the early period of the Five Dynasties, the five-class system of household based on the number of planted trees(植樹) appeared. It was used in various ways in Song. The primary role of five-class system of Song was to assign public service.
Goryeo and China established diplomatic relations and visited each other often through envoy in the period of the Five Dynasties and the early period of the Song Dynasty. Considering that Goryeo had a close relation with Later Zhou(後周) and Song, Goryeo must have accepted their system. The household class system of Goryeo divided households into several classes according to the number of planted trees like Later Zhou.
The main role of the household class system was to assign public services such as a local official service(Hyangniyeok, 鄕吏役) and a military service(軍役) in Goryeo as well as Song. While Song’s system assigned public service to households over third class, Goryeo’s system imposed a local official service, a military service, and a hostage service(Giinyeok, 其人役) to Jokjeong households(足丁戶) and Banjeong households(半丁戶) on the basis of the family register. Goryeo accepted the five-class system of household of China during the late period of Tang and the period of the Five Dynasties. However, it seems that Goryeo developed the three-class system of household when the administrative system divided into counties and prefectures(郡縣制) was organized according to the number of adult males(丁數).
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The household class system(戶等制) of Goryeo basically succeeded to Shilla’s system. However, it was changed into three-class system of household according to social changes during the late period of Shilla and the early period of Goryeo. The thr...
The household class system(戶等制) of Goryeo basically succeeded to Shilla’s system. However, it was changed into three-class system of household according to social changes during the late period of Shilla and the early period of Goryeo. The three-class system of household in Goryeo was established by modifying the five-class system of household of Song under the influence of the five-class system of household in the late period of Tang and the period of the Five Dynasties.
The household class system changed from nine-class system to the five-class system during the period of Tang and Song. This change was caused by a change of class standard according to social and economic changes during this period. The class standard of the nine-class system of household in Tang essentially depended on a financial condition. But the number of adult males(人丁) was another key factor of it. As a military system(府兵制) and a tax system of Tang no longer functioned during the late period of Tang and the period of the Five Dynasties, it was necessary to establish New systems.
The purpose of household class system was to assign public service(職役) and to impose a tax according to financial status of each household. In the early period of the Five Dynasties, the five-class system of household based on the number of planted trees(植樹) appeared. It was used in various ways in Song. The primary role of five-class system of Song was to assign public service.
Goryeo and China established diplomatic relations and visited each other often through envoy in the period of the Five Dynasties and the early period of the Song Dynasty. Considering that Goryeo had a close relation with Later Zhou(後周) and Song, Goryeo must have accepted their system. The household class system of Goryeo divided households into several classes according to the number of planted trees like Later Zhou.
The main role of the household class system was to assign public services such as a local official service(Hyangniyeok, 鄕吏役) and a military service(軍役) in Goryeo as well as Song. While Song’s system assigned public service to households over third class, Goryeo’s system imposed a local official service, a military service, and a hostage service(Giinyeok, 其人役) to Jokjeong households(足丁戶) and Banjeong households(半丁戶) on the basis of the family register. Goryeo accepted the five-class system of household of China during the late period of Tang and the period of the Five Dynasties. However, it seems that Goryeo developed the three-class system of household when the administrative system divided into counties and prefectures(郡縣制) was organized according to the number of adult males(丁數).
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 全德在, "한국고대사회경제사" 태학사 2006
2 金琪燮, "통일신라 공연과 호등제에 관한 비판적 검토" (46) : 2003
3 김기섭, "신라 중고기․중대 균전제 이념의 수용과 전개 -신라와 고려의 연속성과 관련하여-" 한국중세사학회 (29) : 113-147, 2010
4 김기섭, "당대 호등제의 신라적 수용과 변용" 한국고대사학회 (57) : 389-424, 2010
5 신은제, "국역 고려사 열전 1" 민족문화 2006
6 김호동, "고려시대 율령의 복원과 정리" 경인문화사 2009
7 이정희, "고려시대 세제의 연구" 국학자료원 2000
8 박종진, "고려시기 재정운영과 조세제도" 서울대출판부 2000
9 김용선, "고려사 병지 역주" 일조각 2011
10 구산우, "고려 一品軍 三品軍에 관한 새로운 자료의 소개와 분석" 부산경남사학회 (78) : 201-241, 2011
1 全德在, "한국고대사회경제사" 태학사 2006
2 金琪燮, "통일신라 공연과 호등제에 관한 비판적 검토" (46) : 2003
3 김기섭, "신라 중고기․중대 균전제 이념의 수용과 전개 -신라와 고려의 연속성과 관련하여-" 한국중세사학회 (29) : 113-147, 2010
4 김기섭, "당대 호등제의 신라적 수용과 변용" 한국고대사학회 (57) : 389-424, 2010
5 신은제, "국역 고려사 열전 1" 민족문화 2006
6 김호동, "고려시대 율령의 복원과 정리" 경인문화사 2009
7 이정희, "고려시대 세제의 연구" 국학자료원 2000
8 박종진, "고려시기 재정운영과 조세제도" 서울대출판부 2000
9 김용선, "고려사 병지 역주" 일조각 2011
10 구산우, "고려 一品軍 三品軍에 관한 새로운 자료의 소개와 분석" 부산경남사학회 (78) : 201-241, 2011
11 姜晋哲, "高麗土地制度史硏究" 고려대출판부 1980
12 蔡雄錫, "高麗史 刑法志 譯註" 신서원 2009
13 "高麗史"
14 李基白, "高麗 州縣軍考, in 高麗兵制史硏究" 일조각 1968
15 金琪燮, "韓國 古代·中世 戶等制硏究" 혜안 2007
16 柳田節子, "鄕村制の展開" 岩波書店 (9) : 1970
17 崔貞煥, "譯註 高麗史 百官志" 경인문화사 2006
18 朱家源, "談談宋代的鄕村中戶, in 宋史硏究論文集" 上海古籍出版社 1982
19 "續資治通鑑長篇 권113"
20 大津 透, "日唐律令制の財政構造" 岩波書店 2006
21 王曾瑜, "宋朝劃分鄕村五等戶的財産標準, In 宋史硏究論文集" 上海古籍出版社 1982
22 "宋會要輯稿"
23 柳田節子, "宋元鄕村制の硏究" 創文社 1986
24 島居一康, "宋代兩稅の課稅基準と戶等制, In 中國史像の再構成國家と農民" 文理閣 1983
25 高橋芳郞, "宋代主客戶制と戶名" 汲古書院 2002
26 高橋芳郞, "宋代中國の法制と社會" 汲古書院 2002
27 "天一閣藏明鈔本天聖令校證 下冊" 中華書局 2006
28 "唐六典"
29 "唐會要 권85"
30 "唐令拾遺"
31 仁井田陞, "唐令拾遺" 東京大出版會 1964
32 朴根七, "唐代 籍帳制의 運營과 收取制度에 관한 硏究" 서울대 1996
33 박근칠, "唐 前期 地稅 징수와 靑苗簿 作成의 의미" (9) : 1997
34 滋賀秀三, "中國法制史論集" 創文社 2003
35 羅鍾宇, "5대 및 송과의 관계" 국사편찬위원회 (15) : 1995
대전 상대동 고려 유적지의 성격에 대한 시론적 탐색-院村에서 邑治로-
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.81 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.78 | 0.81 | 1.498 | 0.27 |