RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    Lost in Translation: Several Challenges in the Interlinugual Communication of Humor

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104140464

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper discusses several difficulties associated with the interlingual communication of humor from the perspective of Eugene Nida’s dynamic equivalence theory of translation. In particular, it attempts to relate surface and deep cultural aspects of humor with their linguistic markers occurring at what Nida refers to as the referential level, or more specifically signified by the terms semotaxis and connotation.
    Working from the perspective of Nida’s theory that a faithful translation requires a response from the recipients which is cognitively and emotively similar to the response of the original audience, this paper focuses on three examples of religious humor which illustrate the range of difficulties involved in the interlingual translation of humor. The first, a homophone, focuses on the linguistic difficulties involved in the interlingual translation of English puns. The second, from the story of Elijah and the prophets of Baal, explores the necessity of understanding the source culture’s influence on humor scripts. The third deals with the possibility of humor translation becoming offensive by expressing a cultural taboo in the receptor culture.
    Such an understanding is a prerequisite for an effective translation. It is also hoped that this paper will provide a stimulus to better understand the influence that cultural norms of both the source and receptor cultures exert on the interlingual communication of humor.
    번역하기

    This paper discusses several difficulties associated with the interlingual communication of humor from the perspective of Eugene Nida’s dynamic equivalence theory of translation. In particular, it attempts to relate surface and deep cultural aspects...

    This paper discusses several difficulties associated with the interlingual communication of humor from the perspective of Eugene Nida’s dynamic equivalence theory of translation. In particular, it attempts to relate surface and deep cultural aspects of humor with their linguistic markers occurring at what Nida refers to as the referential level, or more specifically signified by the terms semotaxis and connotation.
    Working from the perspective of Nida’s theory that a faithful translation requires a response from the recipients which is cognitively and emotively similar to the response of the original audience, this paper focuses on three examples of religious humor which illustrate the range of difficulties involved in the interlingual translation of humor. The first, a homophone, focuses on the linguistic difficulties involved in the interlingual translation of English puns. The second, from the story of Elijah and the prophets of Baal, explores the necessity of understanding the source culture’s influence on humor scripts. The third deals with the possibility of humor translation becoming offensive by expressing a cultural taboo in the receptor culture.
    Such an understanding is a prerequisite for an effective translation. It is also hoped that this paper will provide a stimulus to better understand the influence that cultural norms of both the source and receptor cultures exert on the interlingual communication of humor.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Shaw, R. D, "Transculturation: The cultural factor in translation and other communication tasks" Pasadena, California: William Carrey Library 1998

    2 Nida, E, "Theories of Translation" 4 (4): 1991

    3 Nida, E. A., "The theory and practice of translation" Brill 2003

    4 "The new Brown-Driver-Briggs-GeseniusHebrew and English lexicon" Hendrickson 1979

    5 Rendsburg, G, "The mock of Baal in 1 Kings 18:27" 50 : 114-117, 1988

    6 Davies, C, "The Danish cartoons, the Muslims and the new battle of Jutland" 21 (21): 2-7, 2008

    7 Raskin, V, "Semantic mechanisms of humor" D. Reidel 1985

    8 "New Living Translation"

    9 "New American Standard Bible"

    10 "King James Version"

    1 Shaw, R. D, "Transculturation: The cultural factor in translation and other communication tasks" Pasadena, California: William Carrey Library 1998

    2 Nida, E, "Theories of Translation" 4 (4): 1991

    3 Nida, E. A., "The theory and practice of translation" Brill 2003

    4 "The new Brown-Driver-Briggs-GeseniusHebrew and English lexicon" Hendrickson 1979

    5 Rendsburg, G, "The mock of Baal in 1 Kings 18:27" 50 : 114-117, 1988

    6 Davies, C, "The Danish cartoons, the Muslims and the new battle of Jutland" 21 (21): 2-7, 2008

    7 Raskin, V, "Semantic mechanisms of humor" D. Reidel 1985

    8 "New Living Translation"

    9 "New American Standard Bible"

    10 "King James Version"

    11 Fine, G. A, "Joking cultures: humor themes as social regulation in group life" 18 (18): 1-22, 2005

    12 Alden, A, "Identifying global and culture-specific dimensions of humor in advertising: A multinational analysis" 57 : 64-75, 1993

    13 Schmitz, J, "Humor as a pedagogical tool in foreign language and translation courses" 18 (18): 1-22, 2002

    14 Nida, E. A, "Customs and culture: Anthropology for Christian missions" Harper & Row Publishers 1954

    15 Krikmann, A, "Contemporary linguistic theories of humour" 33 : 2012

    16 Kittle, R., "Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia(5thed)" Deutsche Biblestiftung 1967

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.2 0.2 0.17
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.14 0.13 0.348 0.14
    더보기
    해외이동버튼