RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    LE 모델로 분석한 핀란드의 국가경쟁력 = National competitiveness of Finland Analyzed by Leadership - Environment Model

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3108452

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is about to analyse and research Finnish Competitiveness, find its implications, and pursue what to learn from the research results, in the era of glocalization. There is a lot of similarity between Korea and Finland, i.e., ruled by neighbor powers, lack of natural resources, and high role of human resources to economic development. Both countries could not help going abroad and opening their markets because of small domestic markets. Until quite recently both countries have increased the amount of input in terms of capital and labor to enhance economic growth, but it sometimes ended with over-investments and foreign exchange crises in results. Finland has raised her competitiveness from 1995 onwards. Among other things, result oriented culture of central and local government underlay the improvement of the competitiveness, against the belief that result oriented culture did not apply except private sector. Finland established many PPPs(Private Public Parterships) in cooperation with central government, local government, other public sectors, and enterprises to utilize Finnish resources. Science Parks were the most visible examples of PPP. And even Science Parks were managed effcicently by themselves, and let bottomlines be measured by others. There are many other lessons to learn from the Finnish experience.
    번역하기

    This study is about to analyse and research Finnish Competitiveness, find its implications, and pursue what to learn from the research results, in the era of glocalization. There is a lot of similarity between Korea and Finland, i.e., ruled by neighb...

    This study is about to analyse and research Finnish Competitiveness, find its implications, and pursue what to learn from the research results, in the era of glocalization. There is a lot of similarity between Korea and Finland, i.e., ruled by neighbor powers, lack of natural resources, and high role of human resources to economic development. Both countries could not help going abroad and opening their markets because of small domestic markets. Until quite recently both countries have increased the amount of input in terms of capital and labor to enhance economic growth, but it sometimes ended with over-investments and foreign exchange crises in results. Finland has raised her competitiveness from 1995 onwards. Among other things, result oriented culture of central and local government underlay the improvement of the competitiveness, against the belief that result oriented culture did not apply except private sector. Finland established many PPPs(Private Public Parterships) in cooperation with central government, local government, other public sectors, and enterprises to utilize Finnish resources. Science Parks were the most visible examples of PPP. And even Science Parks were managed effcicently by themselves, and let bottomlines be measured by others. There are many other lessons to learn from the Finnish experience.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼