RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Motor imagery on upper extremity function for persons with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106109720

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: The purpose of this review was to investigate whether motor imagery training has an effect on the recovery of upper extremity function in individuals with hemiparetic stroke or not.
      Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
      Methods: PubMed and three other databases were searched up to December 18th, 2018 and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating motor imagery training on upper extremity function in persons with a diagnosis of hemiparetic stroke were included.
      This review selected the following information from each study: surname of the first author, published year, nation, population, intervention, therapeutic intensity of intervention, therapeutic comparison, outcome measures, additional therapy, summary of results, and descriptive statistics of outcome measures.
      Results: This review selected seventeen RCTs with 487 stroke survivors and the following intervention methods: six motor imagery training with additional therapeutic technology, two motor imagery training with additional modified constraint-induced therapy, four mirror therapy, and five motor imagery training. Ten RCTs were eligible for meta-analysis after systematic review.
      The motor imagery group were more effective than the control group based on the Fugl-Meyer assessment (3.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 5.22; heterogeneity [chi 2 =8.03, df=8, I 2 =0%], test of overall effect Z=3.76; test for subgroup differences [chi 2 =2.56, df=2, I 2 =21.8%]) and the Action Research Arm Test (1.32; 95% CI, −8.12 to 10.76; heterogeneity [Tau 2 =70.74, chi 2 =15.22, df=3, I 2 =80%], test of overall effect Z=3.76).
      Conclusions: The results of this review suggests that motor imagery shows positive effectiveness on improving upper extremity function in persons with hemiparetic stroke.
      번역하기

      Objective: The purpose of this review was to investigate whether motor imagery training has an effect on the recovery of upper extremity function in individuals with hemiparetic stroke or not. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: ...

      Objective: The purpose of this review was to investigate whether motor imagery training has an effect on the recovery of upper extremity function in individuals with hemiparetic stroke or not.
      Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
      Methods: PubMed and three other databases were searched up to December 18th, 2018 and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating motor imagery training on upper extremity function in persons with a diagnosis of hemiparetic stroke were included.
      This review selected the following information from each study: surname of the first author, published year, nation, population, intervention, therapeutic intensity of intervention, therapeutic comparison, outcome measures, additional therapy, summary of results, and descriptive statistics of outcome measures.
      Results: This review selected seventeen RCTs with 487 stroke survivors and the following intervention methods: six motor imagery training with additional therapeutic technology, two motor imagery training with additional modified constraint-induced therapy, four mirror therapy, and five motor imagery training. Ten RCTs were eligible for meta-analysis after systematic review.
      The motor imagery group were more effective than the control group based on the Fugl-Meyer assessment (3.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 5.22; heterogeneity [chi 2 =8.03, df=8, I 2 =0%], test of overall effect Z=3.76; test for subgroup differences [chi 2 =2.56, df=2, I 2 =21.8%]) and the Action Research Arm Test (1.32; 95% CI, −8.12 to 10.76; heterogeneity [Tau 2 =70.74, chi 2 =15.22, df=3, I 2 =80%], test of overall effect Z=3.76).
      Conclusions: The results of this review suggests that motor imagery shows positive effectiveness on improving upper extremity function in persons with hemiparetic stroke.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Invernizzi M, "The value of adding mirror therapy for upper limb motor recovery of subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial" 49 : 311-317, 2013

      2 Kim H, "The effects of mental practice combined with modified constraint-induced therapy on corticospinal excitability, movement quality, function, and activities of daily living in persons with stroke" 40 : 2449-2457, 2018

      3 Verma R, "Task-oriented circuit class training program with motor imagery for gait rehabilitation in poststroke patients: a randomized controlled trial" 18 (18): 620-632, 2011

      4 Arya KN, "Task-based mirror therapy augmenting motor recovery in poststroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial" 24 : 1738-1748, 2015

      5 Niu CM, "Synergybased FES for post-stroke rehabilitation of upper-limb motor functions" 27 : 256-264, 2019

      6 Frolov AA, "Post-stroke rehabilitation training with a motor-imagery-based brain-computer interface (BCI)-controlled hand exoskeleton: a randomized controlled multicenter trial" 11 : 400-, 2017

      7 O'Sullivan SB, "Physical rehabilitation" F.A. Davis Co 2014

      8 Lai SM, "Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale" 33 : 1840-1844, 2002

      9 Bürge E, "Neutral functional realignment orthosis prevents hand pain in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized trial" 89 : 1857-1862, 2008

      10 Jeannerod M, "Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition" 14 : S103-S109, 2001

      1 Invernizzi M, "The value of adding mirror therapy for upper limb motor recovery of subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial" 49 : 311-317, 2013

      2 Kim H, "The effects of mental practice combined with modified constraint-induced therapy on corticospinal excitability, movement quality, function, and activities of daily living in persons with stroke" 40 : 2449-2457, 2018

      3 Verma R, "Task-oriented circuit class training program with motor imagery for gait rehabilitation in poststroke patients: a randomized controlled trial" 18 (18): 620-632, 2011

      4 Arya KN, "Task-based mirror therapy augmenting motor recovery in poststroke hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial" 24 : 1738-1748, 2015

      5 Niu CM, "Synergybased FES for post-stroke rehabilitation of upper-limb motor functions" 27 : 256-264, 2019

      6 Frolov AA, "Post-stroke rehabilitation training with a motor-imagery-based brain-computer interface (BCI)-controlled hand exoskeleton: a randomized controlled multicenter trial" 11 : 400-, 2017

      7 O'Sullivan SB, "Physical rehabilitation" F.A. Davis Co 2014

      8 Lai SM, "Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale" 33 : 1840-1844, 2002

      9 Bürge E, "Neutral functional realignment orthosis prevents hand pain in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized trial" 89 : 1857-1862, 2008

      10 Jeannerod M, "Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition" 14 : S103-S109, 2001

      11 Li F, "Motor imagery training induces changes in brain neural networks in stroke patients" 13 : 1771-1781, 2018

      12 Kim SS, "Motor imagery training improves upper extremity performance in stroke patients" 27 : 2289-2291, 2015

      13 Dodakian L, "Motor imagery during movement activates the brain more than movement alone after stroke: a pilot study" 46 : 843-848, 2014

      14 Petersen J, "Motor imagery based Brain Computer Interface paradigm for upper limb stroke rehabilitation" 1960-1963, 2018

      15 Page SJ, "Modified constraint-induced therapy combined with mental practice: thinking through better motor outcomes" 40 : 551-554, 2009

      16 Yavuzer G, "Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial" 89 : 393-398, 2008

      17 Thieme H, "Mirror therapy for patients with severe arm paresis after stroke--a randomized controlled trial" 27 : 314-324, 2013

      18 Page SJ, "Mental practice in chronic stroke:results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial" 38 : 1293-1297, 2007

      19 Page SJ, "Longer versus shorter mental practice sessions for affected upper extremity movement after stroke: a randomized controlled trial" 25 : 627-637, 2011

      20 Markman KD, "Handbook of imagination and mental simulation" Psychology Press 2009

      21 Lin LF, "Feasibility and efficacy of wearable devices for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study" 54 : 388-396, 2018

      22 Arvaneh M, "Facilitating motor imagery-based brain-computer interface for stroke patients using passive movement" 28 : 3259-3272, 2017

      23 Huang Q, "Evaluating the effect and mechanism of upper limb motor function recovery induced by immersive virtual-reality-based rehabilitation for subacute stroke subjects: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial" 20 : 104-, 2019

      24 Zimmermann-Schlatter A, "Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation:a systematic review" 5 : 8-, 2008

      25 Hemmen B, "Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase" 21 : 587-594, 2007

      26 Okuyama K, "Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results" 11 : 2018

      27 Nilsen DM, "Effect of imagery perspective on occupational performance after stroke: a randomized controlled trial" 66 : 320-329, 2012

      28 Craje C, "Determining specificity of motor imagery training for upper limb improvement in chronic stroke patients: a training protocol and pilot results" 33 : 359-362, 2010

      29 Hong IK, "Cortical changes after mental imagery training combined with electromyography-triggered electrical stimulation in patients with chronic stroke" 43 : 2506-2509, 2012

      30 Ang KK, "Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke" 7 : 30-, 2014

      31 Liburkina SP, "Brain-computer interface-based motor imagery training for patients with neurological movement disorders" 118 : 63-68, 2018

      32 Decety J, "Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: a neuropsychological interpretation" 73 : 13-34, 1990

      33 Prasad G, "Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study" 7 : 60-, 2010

      34 Ang KK, "A randomized controlled trial of EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface robotic rehabilitation for stroke" 46 : 310-320, 2015

      35 Ang KK, "A clinical study of motor imagery-based brain-computer interface for upper limb robotic rehabilitation" 2009 : 5981-5984, 2009

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼