RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Co-authorship Credit Allocation Methods in the Assessment of Citation Impact of Chemistry Faculty

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103682289

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examined changes in citation index scores and rankings of thirty-five chemistry faculty members at Seoul National University using different co-authorship credit allocation models. Using 1,436 Web of Science papers published between 2007 and 2013, we applied the inflated, fractional, harmonic, network-based allocation, and harmonic+ models to calculate faculty’s h-, R-, and normalization of h- and R- index scores and rankings. The harmonic+ model, which is based on our belief that contribution of primary authors should be the same regardless of collaboration, is designed to minimize the penalty for research collaboration imposed by harmonic and NBA models by boosting the contribution of collaborating primary authors to be on the equal footing with single authors. Although citation rankings by different models are correlated with each other within the same type of citation indicator, rankings of many faculty members changed across models, suggesting the importance of an accurate and relevant authorship credit allocation model in the citation assessment of researchers. The study also found that authorship patterns in conjunction with citation counts are important factors for robust authorship models such as harmonic and NBA, and harmonic+ model may be beneficial for collaborating primary authors. Future research that reexamines the models with updated empirical data would provide further insights into the robustness of the models.
    번역하기

    This study examined changes in citation index scores and rankings of thirty-five chemistry faculty members at Seoul National University using different co-authorship credit allocation models. Using 1,436 Web of Science papers published between 2007 an...

    This study examined changes in citation index scores and rankings of thirty-five chemistry faculty members at Seoul National University using different co-authorship credit allocation models. Using 1,436 Web of Science papers published between 2007 and 2013, we applied the inflated, fractional, harmonic, network-based allocation, and harmonic+ models to calculate faculty’s h-, R-, and normalization of h- and R- index scores and rankings. The harmonic+ model, which is based on our belief that contribution of primary authors should be the same regardless of collaboration, is designed to minimize the penalty for research collaboration imposed by harmonic and NBA models by boosting the contribution of collaborating primary authors to be on the equal footing with single authors. Although citation rankings by different models are correlated with each other within the same type of citation indicator, rankings of many faculty members changed across models, suggesting the importance of an accurate and relevant authorship credit allocation model in the citation assessment of researchers. The study also found that authorship patterns in conjunction with citation counts are important factors for robust authorship models such as harmonic and NBA, and harmonic+ model may be beneficial for collaborating primary authors. Future research that reexamines the models with updated empirical data would provide further insights into the robustness of the models.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Frandsen, T. F., "What is in a name? Credit Assignment Practices in Different Disciplines" 4 (4): 205-231, 2010

    2 Cronin, B., "Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry" 55 (55): 160-168, 2004

    3 Maciejovsky, B., "The Researcher as a Consumer of Scientific Publications: How do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits?" 28 (28): 589-598, 2009

    4 Jin, B., "The R-and AR-indices : Complementing the h-index" 52 (52): 855-863, 2007

    5 Vinkler, P., "Research Contribution, Authorship and Team Cooperativeness" 26 (26): 213-230, 1993

    6 "QS World University Rankings: Methodology. 2014. QS Top Universities"

    7 Hodge, S. E., "Publication Credit" 213 (213): 950-, 1981

    8 Jian, D., "Perceptions of Author Order Versus Contribution among Researchers with Different Professional Ranks and the Potential of Harmonic Counts for Encouraging Ethical Co-authorship Practices" 96 : 277-295, 2013

    9 Price, D. S., "Multiple Authorship" 212 (212): 986-, 1981

    10 Regaldo, A., "Multiauthor Papers on the Rise" 268 (268): 25-, 1995

    1 Frandsen, T. F., "What is in a name? Credit Assignment Practices in Different Disciplines" 4 (4): 205-231, 2010

    2 Cronin, B., "Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry" 55 (55): 160-168, 2004

    3 Maciejovsky, B., "The Researcher as a Consumer of Scientific Publications: How do name-ordering conventions affect inferences about contribution credits?" 28 (28): 589-598, 2009

    4 Jin, B., "The R-and AR-indices : Complementing the h-index" 52 (52): 855-863, 2007

    5 Vinkler, P., "Research Contribution, Authorship and Team Cooperativeness" 26 (26): 213-230, 1993

    6 "QS World University Rankings: Methodology. 2014. QS Top Universities"

    7 Hodge, S. E., "Publication Credit" 213 (213): 950-, 1981

    8 Jian, D., "Perceptions of Author Order Versus Contribution among Researchers with Different Professional Ranks and the Potential of Harmonic Counts for Encouraging Ethical Co-authorship Practices" 96 : 277-295, 2013

    9 Price, D. S., "Multiple Authorship" 212 (212): 986-, 1981

    10 Regaldo, A., "Multiauthor Papers on the Rise" 268 (268): 25-, 1995

    11 Liu, X. Z., "Modifying h-index by Allocating Credit of Multi-authored Papers Whose Author Names Rank Based on Contribution" 6 (6): 557-565, 2012

    12 Cronin, B, "Hyperauthorship: A Postmodern Perversion or Evidence of a Structural Shift in Scholarly Communication Practices?" 52 (52): 558-569, 2001

    13 Hagen, N. T., "Harmonic Publication and Citation Counting : Sharing Authorship Credit Equitably-not Equally, Geometrically or Arithmetically" 84 : 785-793, 2010

    14 Hagen, N. T., "Harmonic Coauthor Credit : A Parsimonious Quantification of the Byline Hierarchy" 7 : 784-791, 2013

    15 Hagen, N. T., "Harmonic Allocation of Authorship Credit: Source-level Correction of Bibliometric Bias Assures Accurate Publication and Citation Analysis" 3 (3): e4021-, 2008

    16 Liu, X. Z., "Fairly Sharing the Credit of Multi-authored Papers and its Application in the Modification of h-index and g-index" 91 (91): 37-49, 2012

    17 Vinkler, P., "Evaluation of the Publication Activity of Research Teams by Means of Scientometric Indicators" 79 (79): 602-612, 2000

    18 Hagen, N. T., "Counting and Comparing Publication Output with and without Equalizing and Inflationary Bias" 8 : 310-317, 2014

    19 Lukovits, I., "Correct Credit Distribution : A Model for Sharing Credit among Coauthors" 36 : 91-98, 1995

    20 Tscharntke, T., "Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications" 5 (5): 18-, 2007

    21 Edoardo Magnone, "An Overview on the South Korean Scientific Production in the Field of Chemistry (1993–2012)" MDPI AG 5 (5): 285-304, 2014

    22 Hirsch, J. E., "An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output" 102 (102): 16569-16572, 2005

    23 Trueba, F. J., "A robust formula to credit authors for their publications" 60 (60): 181-204, 2004

    24 Zhang, C. T., "A Proposal for Calculating Weighted Citations Based on Author Rank" 10 (10): 416-417, 2009

    25 Kim, Jinseok, "A Network-based Approach to Coauthorship Credit Allocation" 101 : 587-602, 2014

    26 Kim, Mee-Jean, "A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications by the Chemistry Department, Seoul National University, Korea" 26 (26): 111-119, 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.59 0.59 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.67 0.952 0.33
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼