RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Comparison between Oral vs. Intravenous Administration of Proton Pump Inhibitors = Comparison between Oral vs. Intravenous Administration of Proton Pump Inhibitors

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60249597

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background: In patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is administered intravenously (IV) following endoscopic treatment. However, if oral administration (PO) of the PPI obtains the same antisecretory effect as IV administration of the PPI, PO PPI treatment will be more advantageous in shortening the length of a patient``s hospital stay compared to IV PPI administration. Methods: The subjects of the current study included 51 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding who did not undergo endoscopic therapy and in whom a visible vessel or blood clot was present. These patients were randomized into two groups, one group receiving IV administration of the PPI (IV PPI group, n=26) and a group in which the PPI was administered orally (PO PPI group, n=25). The 24-hour intragastric pH was measured and the hemostasis rate was compared between the two groups. Results: The hemostasis rate was 92.3% (24/26) in the IV PPI group and 92.0% (23/25) in the PO PPI group (p=0.936). The median 24-hour gastric pH value was 5.93±1.92 in the IV PPI group and 5.73±1.74 in the PO PPI group (p=0.748). Daytime median intragastric pH was 5.94±2.00 in the IV PPI group and 5.58±1.69 in the PO PPI group (p=0.861). Night-time median pH was 5.91±1.95 in the IV PPI group and 5.68±1.86 in the PO PPI group (p=0.624). The mean percent of cases in which gastric pH exceeded 6 was 62.3% in the IV PPI group and 58.5% in the PO PPI group (p=0.672). The difference in the cumulative frequency of cases did not reach a statistical significance. Conclusion: In patients with bleeding peptic ulcer, in which a visible vessel or blood clot was present, there were no significant differences in the hemostasis rate and intragastric pH between intravenous infusion of a PPI and the oral administration of a PPI. Keywords: Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage; Proton Pump Inhibitor; Hemostasis.
      번역하기

      Background: In patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is administered intravenously (IV) following endoscopic treatment. However, if oral administration (PO) of the PPI obtains the same antisecretory effect as IV administra...

      Background: In patients with peptic ulcer bleeding, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is administered intravenously (IV) following endoscopic treatment. However, if oral administration (PO) of the PPI obtains the same antisecretory effect as IV administration of the PPI, PO PPI treatment will be more advantageous in shortening the length of a patient``s hospital stay compared to IV PPI administration. Methods: The subjects of the current study included 51 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding who did not undergo endoscopic therapy and in whom a visible vessel or blood clot was present. These patients were randomized into two groups, one group receiving IV administration of the PPI (IV PPI group, n=26) and a group in which the PPI was administered orally (PO PPI group, n=25). The 24-hour intragastric pH was measured and the hemostasis rate was compared between the two groups. Results: The hemostasis rate was 92.3% (24/26) in the IV PPI group and 92.0% (23/25) in the PO PPI group (p=0.936). The median 24-hour gastric pH value was 5.93±1.92 in the IV PPI group and 5.73±1.74 in the PO PPI group (p=0.748). Daytime median intragastric pH was 5.94±2.00 in the IV PPI group and 5.58±1.69 in the PO PPI group (p=0.861). Night-time median pH was 5.91±1.95 in the IV PPI group and 5.68±1.86 in the PO PPI group (p=0.624). The mean percent of cases in which gastric pH exceeded 6 was 62.3% in the IV PPI group and 58.5% in the PO PPI group (p=0.672). The difference in the cumulative frequency of cases did not reach a statistical significance. Conclusion: In patients with bleeding peptic ulcer, in which a visible vessel or blood clot was present, there were no significant differences in the hemostasis rate and intragastric pH between intravenous infusion of a PPI and the oral administration of a PPI. Keywords: Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage; Proton Pump Inhibitor; Hemostasis.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼