RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      ^(13)C-Octanoic acid 호기 위 배출 검사의 방법에 따른 비교 = Comparison of the ^(13)C-octanoic acid breath gastric emptying test according to the mathematical models

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A341533

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Aim: To compare the accuracies of two mathematical models (non-linear vs. linear model), which is currently available, in the measurement of gastric emptying using ^(13)C-octanoic acid breath test.
      Method: In twenty healthy volunteers, gastric emptying of solids were measured by simultaneous scintigraphy and ^(13)C-octanoic acid breath test up to 4 hours. Gastric half-emptying times (t_(1/2)) and LAG times (t_(lag)) by breath test were analyzed using non-linear model and generalized linear model, and compared with those by scintigraphy.
      Results: In the comparisons of gastric emptying t_(lag), the breath test results were overestimate the scintigraphic results. The standard diviation of difference was 168 minutes (range 0 to 777) by non-linear method and 29 minutes (6 to 116) by linear method. For the t_(1/2), the breath test results were also overestimate the scintigraphic results. The standard diviation of difference was 538 minutes (range -3 to 2,406) by non-linear method and 72 minutes (-11 to 315) by linear method.
      Conclusions: Linear model looks more acurate than non-linear model in the measurement of gastric emptying using ^(13)C-octanoic acid breath test. However, two methods still shows overestimation compared to scintigraphic results, suggesting need for the development of accurate method of ^(13)C-octanoic acid gastric emptying breath test.
      번역하기

      Aim: To compare the accuracies of two mathematical models (non-linear vs. linear model), which is currently available, in the measurement of gastric emptying using ^(13)C-octanoic acid breath test. Method: In twenty healthy volunteers, gastric emptyi...

      Aim: To compare the accuracies of two mathematical models (non-linear vs. linear model), which is currently available, in the measurement of gastric emptying using ^(13)C-octanoic acid breath test.
      Method: In twenty healthy volunteers, gastric emptying of solids were measured by simultaneous scintigraphy and ^(13)C-octanoic acid breath test up to 4 hours. Gastric half-emptying times (t_(1/2)) and LAG times (t_(lag)) by breath test were analyzed using non-linear model and generalized linear model, and compared with those by scintigraphy.
      Results: In the comparisons of gastric emptying t_(lag), the breath test results were overestimate the scintigraphic results. The standard diviation of difference was 168 minutes (range 0 to 777) by non-linear method and 29 minutes (6 to 116) by linear method. For the t_(1/2), the breath test results were also overestimate the scintigraphic results. The standard diviation of difference was 538 minutes (range -3 to 2,406) by non-linear method and 72 minutes (-11 to 315) by linear method.
      Conclusions: Linear model looks more acurate than non-linear model in the measurement of gastric emptying using ^(13)C-octanoic acid breath test. However, two methods still shows overestimation compared to scintigraphic results, suggesting need for the development of accurate method of ^(13)C-octanoic acid gastric emptying breath test.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼