都市別 住居水準隔差分析에 관한 硏究

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The primary purpose of the present study is to assess the impact of housing policy on the condition and quality of housing of 40 cities in Korea. Different levels of quantity of housing among different cities are evaluated in comparative perspectives. Special emphasis is placed on the quality of supplemental facilities and the overall consumtion patterns.
Significant differences among 40 cities are detected from the present analysis espacially in terms of the number of substandard housing, delapidated housing. housing with central heating. housing with flush toilet, and ect. On the other hand, factors like homeownership rate, per capita floor space, and the size of housing are not substantially different among cities. Another words, there is a significant difference among cities in terms of the quality of housing but not very much disparity in terms of the quantity of housing. Another interesting finding is that the metropolitan area, a newtown, and satellite cities are better in overall structural conditions of housing but worse in housing consumption patterns such as the density and overcrowdedness, compared to small and medium size cities. It has strong policy implication that the nature of housing problem is defferent among cities at different location and in defferent sizes. It is obvious from the analysis that a lot more attention have been placed on housing policies in metropolitan area and a newtown compared to small and medium size cities. One of the objectives of the present study is to examine the basic premise of housing policy which secures the provision of the minimum housing welfare to all the people of the country. In order to accomplish this objective, a spatially as well as socioeconomically defferentiated housing policy should be developed. Different strategies and implementation criteria should be applied to housing problems pertinent to different cities.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• I. 序論 = 1
• A. 硏究目的 = 1
• B. 硏究範圍 및 方法 = 4
• II. 都市別 住宅現況 = 8
• A. 住宅의 □과 質的水準 = 8
• 1. 住宅普及率 = 8
• 2. 不良住宅 = 11
• 3. 建築年度 = 14
• 4. 外壁 및 지붕材料 = 17
• 5. 房數 = 21
• 6. 住宅當 面積 = 23
• B. 柱宅의 附帶施設 水準 = 25
• 1. 부엌施設 = 25
• 2. 便所施設 = 27
• 3. 沐浴施設 = 30
• 4. 上·下水道施設 = 33
• 5. 援房施設 = 35
• C. 住居狀態態水準 = 38
• 1. 住居當 同居家口數 = 38
• 2. 家口當·人當 占有面積 = 41
• 3. 房當 居住人數 = 42
• 4. 占有形態 = 45
• III. 都市別 住宅水準 隔差分析 = 48
• A. 都市別 住居水準 隔差의 測定方法 = 48
• 1. 都市別 住居水準 隔差의 意義 = 48
• 2. 隔差의 測定方法 = 50
• B. 住宅 및 住居水準 隔差 = 50
• 1. 住宅의 □과 質的水準의 隔差 = 57
• 2. 附帶施設의 隔差 = 59
• 3. 住居狀態水準의 隔差 = 60
• C. 都市別 住宅 및 住居水準 比較 = 61
• 1. 住宅의 □과 質的水準 比較 = 61
• 2. 住宅의 附帶施設水準 比較 = 64
• 3. 住居狀態水準 比較 = 67
• 4. 都市別 住居水準의 比較 = 67
• IV. 向後 都市別 住宅政策 方向 = 73
• A. 住宅政策의 槪觀 = 73
• 1. 經濟開發 5 個年計劃 以前 = 73
• 2. 第1次에서 第4次 5個年計劃期間 = 73
• 3. 第5次經濟社會發展 5 5個年計劃 = 77
• B. 都市別 住宅政策 摸索 = 82
• 1. 向後의 住宅政策 方向 = 82
• 2. 都市別 住宅政策 方案 = 86
• V. 結論 = 95
• 參考文獻 = 97
• 英文抄錄 = 102