RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      행정지도에 따른 위법행위에 대한 형법적 고찰 -행정지도에 의한 카르텔 행위의 범죄체계론적 지위- = A Criminal Study on Cartel by Administrative Guideline

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99675066

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Recently with the introduction of criminal liability on cartel, the regulation on cartel in FTCA by administrative guideline should be analyzed by criminal legal system. Especially, a analysis will focus on the appropriate systematic position of the cartel by administrative guideline in criminal justification. This analysis is important as it depends on whether administrative guideline conforms to criminal justification or not. It is also important that which is positioned among 3 doctrines, Tatbestand, illegality, and liability. First of all, the lack of autonomous mind by the administrative guideline is insufficient to exclude Tatbestand. Secondly, Necessity and legitimacy were referred in illegality in criminal doctrine. The administrative guideline doesn`t meet requirement from lack of present jeopardy, however legitimacy under the law could be applied to administrative guideline when under the law is broadly interpreted as law of administrative organization or Administrative Procedures Act. Lastly, Mistake of law and Impossible expectation are referred in a liability doctrine.
      번역하기

      Recently with the introduction of criminal liability on cartel, the regulation on cartel in FTCA by administrative guideline should be analyzed by criminal legal system. Especially, a analysis will focus on the appropriate systematic position of the c...

      Recently with the introduction of criminal liability on cartel, the regulation on cartel in FTCA by administrative guideline should be analyzed by criminal legal system. Especially, a analysis will focus on the appropriate systematic position of the cartel by administrative guideline in criminal justification. This analysis is important as it depends on whether administrative guideline conforms to criminal justification or not. It is also important that which is positioned among 3 doctrines, Tatbestand, illegality, and liability. First of all, the lack of autonomous mind by the administrative guideline is insufficient to exclude Tatbestand. Secondly, Necessity and legitimacy were referred in illegality in criminal doctrine. The administrative guideline doesn`t meet requirement from lack of present jeopardy, however legitimacy under the law could be applied to administrative guideline when under the law is broadly interpreted as law of administrative organization or Administrative Procedures Act. Lastly, Mistake of law and Impossible expectation are referred in a liability doctrine.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼