RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국과 독일 주식시장에서의 변동성 전이 = Volatility Spillover Effects between Korean and German Stock Markets

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104832194

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this study, mutual volatility spillover effects between stock markets of Korea and Germany have examined, using symmetric and asymmetric bivariate GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity) BEKK (Baba, Engle, Kraft, and Kroner) regression models. The GARCH-BEKK model is based on a framework without any restrictions on the conditional correlations of the multivariate model. Accordingly this model can differentiate directions and magnitudes of volatility spillovers. Additionally, the asymmetric model can differentiate downward shock (resulting from unexpected increase in return) and upward shock (unexpected decrease in return), therefore it is chosen in this study to find out existence of this asymmetry. It is shown that there is a obvious distinction between downward and upward shock from many recent studies.
    Total sample period of this paper is 4,173 days from the beginning of 1997 to the end of 2012. However, to discover the volatility spillover effect in times of crisis more precisely, I add another sub-sample period of Global Financial Crisis from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009.
    Major findings are as follows.
    First, shock spillover from Korea to Germany is shown to be significantly positive, contrary to the significantly negative effect of that from Germany to Korea, from the estimation of symmetric model during the whole sample period of 1997 to 2012.
    Second, downward shock spillovers stemming from the unexpected decrease in market return in both directions turn out to be negative in the whole sample period, suggesting mutual diversification effect between these two countries.
    Third, during the Global Financial Crisis times, results for the shock spillovers from the symmetric model are changed to be just the opposite from the results during the whole sample period. In other words, shock spillover from Germany to Korea turns out to be positive whereas that from Korea to Germany is shown to be negative.
    Finally and most importantly, downward shock from Germany to Korea during the GFC times turns out to be significantly negative while that from Korea to Germany shows still positive, signaling diversification effect in portfolio formation from Korea especially in the crisis times.
    The last finding is perhaps for the first time and quite surprising and valuable among the studies for international volatility spillovers in the global stock market. The last finding is the existence of significantly negative shock spillover, i.e., shock reduction from the developed market to the emerging market.
    번역하기

    In this study, mutual volatility spillover effects between stock markets of Korea and Germany have examined, using symmetric and asymmetric bivariate GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity) BEKK (Baba, Engle, Kraft, and Krone...

    In this study, mutual volatility spillover effects between stock markets of Korea and Germany have examined, using symmetric and asymmetric bivariate GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity) BEKK (Baba, Engle, Kraft, and Kroner) regression models. The GARCH-BEKK model is based on a framework without any restrictions on the conditional correlations of the multivariate model. Accordingly this model can differentiate directions and magnitudes of volatility spillovers. Additionally, the asymmetric model can differentiate downward shock (resulting from unexpected increase in return) and upward shock (unexpected decrease in return), therefore it is chosen in this study to find out existence of this asymmetry. It is shown that there is a obvious distinction between downward and upward shock from many recent studies.
    Total sample period of this paper is 4,173 days from the beginning of 1997 to the end of 2012. However, to discover the volatility spillover effect in times of crisis more precisely, I add another sub-sample period of Global Financial Crisis from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009.
    Major findings are as follows.
    First, shock spillover from Korea to Germany is shown to be significantly positive, contrary to the significantly negative effect of that from Germany to Korea, from the estimation of symmetric model during the whole sample period of 1997 to 2012.
    Second, downward shock spillovers stemming from the unexpected decrease in market return in both directions turn out to be negative in the whole sample period, suggesting mutual diversification effect between these two countries.
    Third, during the Global Financial Crisis times, results for the shock spillovers from the symmetric model are changed to be just the opposite from the results during the whole sample period. In other words, shock spillover from Germany to Korea turns out to be positive whereas that from Korea to Germany is shown to be negative.
    Finally and most importantly, downward shock from Germany to Korea during the GFC times turns out to be significantly negative while that from Korea to Germany shows still positive, signaling diversification effect in portfolio formation from Korea especially in the crisis times.
    The last finding is perhaps for the first time and quite surprising and valuable among the studies for international volatility spillovers in the global stock market. The last finding is the existence of significantly negative shock spillover, i.e., shock reduction from the developed market to the emerging market.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김석진, "한국, 중국 및 미국 주식시장의 동조화" 한국재무관리학회 28 (28): 1-23, 2011

    2 김병준, "한·중·일 주식시장에서의 충격전이효과 분석" 한국생산성학회 26 (26): 65-95, 2012

    3 김병준, "신흥주식시장에서의 변동성반응가설 검정" 한국재무관리학회 26 (26): 191-234, 2009

    4 신범철, "세계자본시장 변동성이 국내 외환시장과 주식시장에 미치는 비대칭적 전이효과 분석" 한국기업경영학회 18 (18): 261-276, 2011

    5 김병준, "상태공간모형을 이용한 신흥국 채권수익률 스프레드 분석" 아시아.유럽미래학회 7 (7): 1-23, 2010

    6 남주하, "미국 주식시장의 동아시아 주식시장으로의 비대칭적 변동성 이전효과 분석" 한국국제경제학회 9 (9): 119-148, 2003

    7 김권식, "금융위기와 신흥국 채권스프레드의 과잉반응" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 241-254, 2010

    8 Baldwin, R., "Zeros, Quality and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence" 1-48, 2007

    9 Steeley, J. M., "Volatility Transmission between Stock and Bond Markets" 16 (16): 71-86, 2006

    10 Skintzi, V. D., "Volatility Spillovers and Dynamic Correlation in European Bond Markets" 16 (16): 23-40, 2006

    1 김석진, "한국, 중국 및 미국 주식시장의 동조화" 한국재무관리학회 28 (28): 1-23, 2011

    2 김병준, "한·중·일 주식시장에서의 충격전이효과 분석" 한국생산성학회 26 (26): 65-95, 2012

    3 김병준, "신흥주식시장에서의 변동성반응가설 검정" 한국재무관리학회 26 (26): 191-234, 2009

    4 신범철, "세계자본시장 변동성이 국내 외환시장과 주식시장에 미치는 비대칭적 전이효과 분석" 한국기업경영학회 18 (18): 261-276, 2011

    5 김병준, "상태공간모형을 이용한 신흥국 채권수익률 스프레드 분석" 아시아.유럽미래학회 7 (7): 1-23, 2010

    6 남주하, "미국 주식시장의 동아시아 주식시장으로의 비대칭적 변동성 이전효과 분석" 한국국제경제학회 9 (9): 119-148, 2003

    7 김권식, "금융위기와 신흥국 채권스프레드의 과잉반응" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 241-254, 2010

    8 Baldwin, R., "Zeros, Quality and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence" 1-48, 2007

    9 Steeley, J. M., "Volatility Transmission between Stock and Bond Markets" 16 (16): 71-86, 2006

    10 Skintzi, V. D., "Volatility Spillovers and Dynamic Correlation in European Bond Markets" 16 (16): 23-40, 2006

    11 Christiansen, C., "Volatility Spillover Effects in European Bond Markets" 13 (13): 923-948, 2007

    12 Frank, N., "Transmission of Liquidity Shocks:Evidence from the 2007 Subprime Crisis" IMF 2008

    13 Bergstand, G. H., "The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foun dations and Empirical Evidence" 67 (67): 474-481, 1985

    14 Chuliá H., "The Economic Value of Volatility Transmission between the Stock and Bond Markets" 28 (28): 1066-1094, 2008

    15 Chen, Z. H., "Regulation Change and Volatility Spillovers:Evidence from China’s Stock Markets" 46 (46): 140-157, 2010

    16 Andersen, T. G., "Real-time Price Discovery in Global Stock, Bond, and Foreign Exchange Markets" 73 (73): 251-277, 2007

    17 Glosten, L. R., "On the Relation between the Expected Value and the Volatility of Nominal Excess Return on Stocks" 48 (48): 1779-1801, 1993

    18 Baba, Y., "Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCH"

    19 Engle, R. F., "Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCH" 11 (11): 122-150, 1995

    20 Cotter, J., "Multivariate Modeling of Daily REIT Volatility" 32 (32): 305-325, 2006

    21 Kroner, K. F., "Modeling Asymmetric Comovements of Asset Returns" 11 (11): 817-844, 1998

    22 Granger, C. W. J., "Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods" 37 (37): 424-438, 1969

    23 Eun, C. S., "International Transmission of Stock Market Movements" 24 (24): 241-256, 1989

    24 Fleming, J., "Information and Volatility Linkages in the Stock, Bond, and Money Markets" 49 (49): 111-137, 1998

    25 Laopodis, N. T., "Government Bond Market Integration within European Union" 19 : 56-76, 2008

    26 Frank, N., "Financial Spillovers to Emerging Markets during the Global Financial Crisis" IMF 2009

    27 Kim, S., "Evolution of International Stock and Bond Market Integration:Influence of the European Monetary Union" 30 (30): 1507-1534, 2006

    28 Berndt, E. K., "Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models" 3 (3): 653-665, 1974

    29 Johansen, S., "Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models" 59 (59): 1551-1580, 1991

    30 Ciarlone, A., "Emerging Markets Spreads and Global Financial Conditions" 19 (19): 222-239, 2009

    31 Abad, P., "EMU and European Government Bond Market Integration" 34 (34): 2851-2860, 2010

    32 Deardoff, A. V., "Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?" ISBN 0-226-25995-1 : 7-32, 1998

    33 Hamao, Y., "Correlation in Price Changes and Volatility across International Stock Markets" 3 (3): 281-307, 1990

    34 Dean, W. G., "Asymmetry in Return and Volatility Spillover between Equity and Bond Markets in Australia" 18 (18): 272-289, 2010

    35 Koutmos, G., "Asymmetric Volatility Transmission in International Stock Markets" 14 (14): 747-762, 1995

    36 강상훈, "Asymmetric Volatility Transmission between Stock and Bond Markets in Korea" 한국재무관리학회 28 (28): 27-44, 2011

    37 Cappiello, L. R., "Asymmetric Dynamics in the Correlations of Global Equity and Bond Returns" 4 (4): 537-572, 2006

    38 Hunter, D. M., "A Conditional Assessment of the Relationships between Major World Bond Markets" 11 (11): 463-482, 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.47
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.47 0.46 0.727 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼