경영상 해고에 관한 대법원 판례 분석과 평가

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article is critical of the viewpoint of the courts on the cases of economic dismissals and organizes and analyses precedents from the Supreme Court case(66Do204) in 1966 where the concept of economic dismissals was first introduced, through the Supreme Court case(87DaKa2132) having established the 4-requirements-system for economic dismissals, to the recent Supreme Court cases to analyze and evaluate the process of change. To sum up, the process of change starts from the conceptualization of economic dismissal→the establishment of requirements of economic dismissal→the relaxation of the requirement of urgent necessity in management→the request for the overall and comprehensive consideration about the requirements of economic dismissal→the re-relaxation of the requirement of urgent necessity in management up to now. This paper analyzes and evaluates the precedents leading such changes and reviews the rulings influenced thereby with priority given to the requirements of economic dismissal.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조상균, "정리해고의 정당성" 법학연구소 18 (18): 557-574, 2006

2 도재형, "정리해고의 절차적 제한" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (18) : 145-178, 2005

3 박은정, "정리해고의 요건에 관한 대법원 판례의 동향 분석" 중앙노동위원회 (36) : 2009

4 박은정, "정리해고를 제한하기로 하는 내용의 단체협약의 효력" 한국노동연구원 2014

5 전형배, "우리나라 경영해고의 현황과 과제" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (34) : 1-44, 2013

6 조용만, "고용안정협약을 위반한 정리해고의 효력" 한국노동법학회 (38) : 2011

7 박수근, "경영상 해고와 고용안정협약" 한국노동법학회 (39) : 139-163, 2011