RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Fracture resistance of upper central incisors restored with different posts and cores

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103888584

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Objectives: To determine and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different posts and cores. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight upper central incisors were randomly divided into four groups: cast post and core (group 1), fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) post and composite core (group 2), composite post and core (group 3), and controls (group 4). Mesio-distal and bucco-lingual dimensions at 7 and 14 mm from the apex were compared to ensure standardization among the groups. Twelve teeth were prepared for crown restoration (group 4). Teeth in other groups were endodontically treated, decoronated at 14 mm from the apex, and prepared for posts and cores. Resin-based materials were used for cementation in groups 1 and 2. In group 3, composite was used directly to fill the post space and for core build-up. All samples were restored by standard metal crowns using glass ionomer cement, mounted at 135° vertical angle, subjected to thermomechanical aging, and then fractured using a universal testing machine. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Fracture resistance of the groups was as follows: Control (group 4) > cast post and core (group 1) > fiber post and composite core (group 2) > composite post and core (group 3). All samples in groups 2 and 3 fractured in restorable patterns, whereas most (58%) in group 1 were non-restorable. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, FRC posts showed acceptable fracture resistance with favorable fracture patterns for reconstruction of upper central incisors.
      번역하기

      Objectives: To determine and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different posts and cores. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight upper central incisors were randomly divided into four groups...

      Objectives: To determine and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different posts and cores. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight upper central incisors were randomly divided into four groups: cast post and core (group 1), fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) post and composite core (group 2), composite post and core (group 3), and controls (group 4). Mesio-distal and bucco-lingual dimensions at 7 and 14 mm from the apex were compared to ensure standardization among the groups. Twelve teeth were prepared for crown restoration (group 4). Teeth in other groups were endodontically treated, decoronated at 14 mm from the apex, and prepared for posts and cores. Resin-based materials were used for cementation in groups 1 and 2. In group 3, composite was used directly to fill the post space and for core build-up. All samples were restored by standard metal crowns using glass ionomer cement, mounted at 135° vertical angle, subjected to thermomechanical aging, and then fractured using a universal testing machine. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Fracture resistance of the groups was as follows: Control (group 4) > cast post and core (group 1) > fiber post and composite core (group 2) > composite post and core (group 3). All samples in groups 2 and 3 fractured in restorable patterns, whereas most (58%) in group 1 were non-restorable. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, FRC posts showed acceptable fracture resistance with favorable fracture patterns for reconstruction of upper central incisors.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 금혜조, "섬유포스트의 표면 처리방법이 복합레진 코어와의 결합력에 미치는 영향" 대한치과보존학회 35 (35): 173-179, 2010

      2 김종현, "미성숙 치아 모델에서 포스트의 종류와 크기가 치아의 파절 저항성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한치과보존학회 35 (35): 257-266, 2010

      3 Mireku AS, "Vertical fracture of root filled teeth restored with posts: the effects of patient age and dentine thickness" 43 : 218-225, 2010

      4 Zhang XH, "The measurement and comparison of shear fracture strength and shear bond strength between carbon fiber post and some other posts" 38 : 339-341, 2003

      5 Vichi A, "The effect of different storage conditions and duration on the fracture strength of three types of translucent fiber posts" 24 : 832-838, 2008

      6 Drummond JL, "Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin" 19 : 226-231, 2003

      7 Dallari A, "Six years of in vitro/in vivo experience with Composipost" S57-S63, 1996

      8 Ferrario VF, "Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults" 31 : 18-22, 2004

      9 Ferrari M, "Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts" 13 : 9B-13B, 2000

      10 Sahafi A, "Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts" 17 : 307-312, 2004

      1 금혜조, "섬유포스트의 표면 처리방법이 복합레진 코어와의 결합력에 미치는 영향" 대한치과보존학회 35 (35): 173-179, 2010

      2 김종현, "미성숙 치아 모델에서 포스트의 종류와 크기가 치아의 파절 저항성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한치과보존학회 35 (35): 257-266, 2010

      3 Mireku AS, "Vertical fracture of root filled teeth restored with posts: the effects of patient age and dentine thickness" 43 : 218-225, 2010

      4 Zhang XH, "The measurement and comparison of shear fracture strength and shear bond strength between carbon fiber post and some other posts" 38 : 339-341, 2003

      5 Vichi A, "The effect of different storage conditions and duration on the fracture strength of three types of translucent fiber posts" 24 : 832-838, 2008

      6 Drummond JL, "Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin" 19 : 226-231, 2003

      7 Dallari A, "Six years of in vitro/in vivo experience with Composipost" S57-S63, 1996

      8 Ferrario VF, "Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults" 31 : 18-22, 2004

      9 Ferrari M, "Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts" 13 : 9B-13B, 2000

      10 Sahafi A, "Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts" 17 : 307-312, 2004

      11 Lidén C, "Nickel on the Swedish market. Follow-up after implementation of the Nickel Directive" 52 : 29-35, 2005

      12 Duret B, "New concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the Composipost (1)" 60 : 131-141, 1990

      13 Ferrari M, "Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts" 20 : 287-291, 2007

      14 Duret B, "Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost" S50-S56, 1996

      15 Libman WJ, "Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns" 8 : 155-161, 1995

      16 Soares CJ, "Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests" 19 : 11-16, 2005

      17 Nothdurft FP, "Influence of endodontic posts on the fracture behavior of crowned premolars with class II cavities" 36 : 287-293, 2008

      18 Hansen EK, "In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with amalgam" 6 : 49-55, 1990

      19 Qing H, "In vitro evaluation of the fracture resistance of anterior endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber and zircon posts" 97 : 93-98, 2007

      20 Varvara G, "In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and failure mode of internally restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors with differing heights of residual dentin" 98 : 365-372, 2007

      21 Cormier CJ, "In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration" 10 : 26-36, 2001

      22 Maccari PC, "Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems" 19 : 30-36, 2007

      23 Heydecke G, "Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study" 29 : 427-433, 2001

      24 Hayashi M, "Fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores and crowns" 22 : 477-485, 2006

      25 Maccari PC, "Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthetic posts" 15 : 25-30, 2003

      26 Bolay Ş, "Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with or without post systems" 7 : 148-153, 2012

      27 Newman MP, "Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts" 89 : 360-367, 2003

      28 Juloski J, "Ferrule effect: a literature review" 38 : 11-19, 2012

      29 Fernandes AS, "Factors determining post selection: a literature review" 90 : 556-562, 2003

      30 Fernandes AS, "Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review" 14 : 355-363, 2001

      31 Nergiz I, "Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention" 29 : 28-34, 2002

      32 Naumann M, "Effect of incomplete crown ferrules on load capacity of endodontically treated maxillary incisors restored with fiber posts, composite build-ups, and all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro evaluation after chewing simulation" 64 : 31-36, 2006

      33 Fovet Y, "Corrosion by galvanic coupling between carbon fiber posts and different alloys" 16 : 364-373, 2000

      34 Rosentritt M, "Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth‐coloured posts and cores" 27 : 595-601, 2000

      35 Monticelli F, "Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting" 13 : E214-E221, 2008

      36 Sirimai S, "An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-andcoresystems" 81 : 262-269, 1999

      37 Fredriksson M, "A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts" 80 : 151-157, 1998

      38 Strassler HE, "A new fiber post for esthetic dentistry" 24 : 742-748, 2003

      39 Duret B, "A new concept of coronoradicular reconstruction, the Composipost (2)" 60 : 69-77, 1990

      40 Jung RE, "A comparison of composite post buildups and cast gold post-and-core buildups for the restoration of nonvital teeth after 5 to 10 years" 20 : 63-69, 2007

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.25 0.25 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.19 0.448 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼