RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1960년대 근대화 정책과 대학 = The Modernization Policy of the Universities in the 1960s

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104574211

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the 1960s, the “modernization” process of the universities was led by the government, which maintained tight control upon all the Private universities and pushed forward a strategy designed to boost the development of human resources in areas like science and engineering. The University management system created by the military Park Jeong-hi regime went through numerous controversies (“autonomous functions of the university versus state control”), but after the mid-1960s a “Control & Support” strategy was initiated, and all the universities either national or public or private, were all encouraged (or demanded) to raise scientific and engineering personnel, through post graduate schools and research institutes.
      In the 1960s, the universities continued to lose their respective identities and became rather ‘homogenized’, by the state-initiated modernization strategy and the directions for research and education laid out by such strategy. The University power, mostly composed of the private schools, did not have enough resources or momentum to survive the rapid wake of modernization enabled by economic growth. They all had to fall behind, and the state which had both a ‘carrot’ and a ‘stick’, “controled and supported” the universities at the same time, and led the reformation of the universities, so that they could raise and train human resources in the areas of science and technology, which was what the government was in need of.
      As we can see, the “university modernization” of the 1960s was initiated and proceeded upon the mutual needs of both the state and the university power. The universities today, which tend to follow the state’s education and academism policies in order to secure more funding, instead of trying to earn respect as an academic community, seem to have come from the 1960s, when the state power was relentlessly pursuing modernization in all areas of the country.
      번역하기

      In the 1960s, the “modernization” process of the universities was led by the government, which maintained tight control upon all the Private universities and pushed forward a strategy designed to boost the development of human resources in areas l...

      In the 1960s, the “modernization” process of the universities was led by the government, which maintained tight control upon all the Private universities and pushed forward a strategy designed to boost the development of human resources in areas like science and engineering. The University management system created by the military Park Jeong-hi regime went through numerous controversies (“autonomous functions of the university versus state control”), but after the mid-1960s a “Control & Support” strategy was initiated, and all the universities either national or public or private, were all encouraged (or demanded) to raise scientific and engineering personnel, through post graduate schools and research institutes.
      In the 1960s, the universities continued to lose their respective identities and became rather ‘homogenized’, by the state-initiated modernization strategy and the directions for research and education laid out by such strategy. The University power, mostly composed of the private schools, did not have enough resources or momentum to survive the rapid wake of modernization enabled by economic growth. They all had to fall behind, and the state which had both a ‘carrot’ and a ‘stick’, “controled and supported” the universities at the same time, and led the reformation of the universities, so that they could raise and train human resources in the areas of science and technology, which was what the government was in need of.
      As we can see, the “university modernization” of the 1960s was initiated and proceeded upon the mutual needs of both the state and the university power. The universities today, which tend to follow the state’s education and academism policies in order to secure more funding, instead of trying to earn respect as an academic community, seem to have come from the 1960s, when the state power was relentlessly pursuing modernization in all areas of the country.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the 1960s, the “modernization” process of the universities was led by the government, which maintained tight control upon all the Private universities and pushed forward a strategy designed to boost the development of human resources in areas like science and engineering. The University management system created by the military Park Jeong-hi regime went through numerous controversies (“autonomous functions of the university versus state control”), but after the mid-1960s a “Control & Support” strategy was initiated, and all the universities either national or public or private, were all encouraged (or demanded) to raise scientific and engineering personnel, through post graduate schools and research institutes.
      In the 1960s, the universities continued to lose their respective identities and became rather ‘homogenized’, by the state-initiated modernization strategy and the directions for research and education laid out by such strategy. The University power, mostly composed of the private schools, did not have enough resources or momentum to survive the rapid wake of modernization enabled by economic growth. They all had to fall behind, and the state which had both a ‘carrot’ and a ‘stick’, “controled and supported” the universities at the same time, and led the reformation of the universities, so that they could raise and train human resources in the areas of science and technology, which was what the government was in need of.
      As we can see, the “university modernization” of the 1960s was initiated and proceeded upon the mutual needs of both the state and the university power. The universities today, which tend to follow the state’s education and academism policies in order to secure more funding, instead of trying to earn respect as an academic community, seem to have come from the 1960s, when the state power was relentlessly pursuing modernization in all areas of the country.
      번역하기

      In the 1960s, the “modernization” process of the universities was led by the government, which maintained tight control upon all the Private universities and pushed forward a strategy designed to boost the development of human resources in areas l...

      In the 1960s, the “modernization” process of the universities was led by the government, which maintained tight control upon all the Private universities and pushed forward a strategy designed to boost the development of human resources in areas like science and engineering. The University management system created by the military Park Jeong-hi regime went through numerous controversies (“autonomous functions of the university versus state control”), but after the mid-1960s a “Control & Support” strategy was initiated, and all the universities either national or public or private, were all encouraged (or demanded) to raise scientific and engineering personnel, through post graduate schools and research institutes.
      In the 1960s, the universities continued to lose their respective identities and became rather ‘homogenized’, by the state-initiated modernization strategy and the directions for research and education laid out by such strategy. The University power, mostly composed of the private schools, did not have enough resources or momentum to survive the rapid wake of modernization enabled by economic growth. They all had to fall behind, and the state which had both a ‘carrot’ and a ‘stick’, “controled and supported” the universities at the same time, and led the reformation of the universities, so that they could raise and train human resources in the areas of science and technology, which was what the government was in need of.
      As we can see, the “university modernization” of the 1960s was initiated and proceeded upon the mutual needs of both the state and the university power. The universities today, which tend to follow the state’s education and academism policies in order to secure more funding, instead of trying to earn respect as an academic community, seem to have come from the 1960s, when the state power was relentlessly pursuing modernization in all areas of the country.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 문만용, "한국의 현대적 연구체제의 형성: KIST의 설립과 변천, 1968-1980)" 선인 2010

      2 김정인, "한국사학 형성의 역사와 구조적 특성, In 사학문제의 해법을 모색한다" 실천문학사 2012

      3 김종철, "한국교육정책연구" 교육과학사 1989

      4 성내운, "한국교육의 증언" 배영사 1965

      5 오천석, "한국교육사" 현대교육총서출판사 1964

      6 유봉호, "한국 초급대학에 관한 연구" 2 : 1964

      7 "최고회의보"

      8 "조선일보"

      9 신범식, "조국의 근대화" 동아출판사 1965

      10 김석근, "조국 근대화 이념과 박정희, 그리고 5·16, In 5·16과 박정희 근대화 노선의비교사적 조명" 선인 2012

      1 문만용, "한국의 현대적 연구체제의 형성: KIST의 설립과 변천, 1968-1980)" 선인 2010

      2 김정인, "한국사학 형성의 역사와 구조적 특성, In 사학문제의 해법을 모색한다" 실천문학사 2012

      3 김종철, "한국교육정책연구" 교육과학사 1989

      4 성내운, "한국교육의 증언" 배영사 1965

      5 오천석, "한국교육사" 현대교육총서출판사 1964

      6 유봉호, "한국 초급대학에 관한 연구" 2 : 1964

      7 "최고회의보"

      8 "조선일보"

      9 신범식, "조국의 근대화" 동아출판사 1965

      10 김석근, "조국 근대화 이념과 박정희, 그리고 5·16, In 5·16과 박정희 근대화 노선의비교사적 조명" 선인 2012

      11 필립 알트바하, "제3세계의 고등교육" 현대사상사 1992

      12 한국산업기술개발본부, "전국고등교육기관실태조사연구보고서" 1967

      13 "신동아"

      14 "세대"

      15 김종철, "세계안의 한국교육" 배영사 1970

      16 "사상계"

      17 백낙준, "백낙준전집5: 대학과교육" 1995

      18 오성철, "박정희의 국가주의 교육론과 경제성장" 11 :

      19 정일준, "미제국의 제3세계 통치와 근대화이론-군산학복합체와 근대화이론의 탄생-" 비판사회학회 57 : 5-147, 2003

      20 허은, "미국의 헤게모니와 한국 민족주의" 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2008

      21 "문교공보"

      22 박태균, "로스토우 제3세계 근대화론과 한국" 역사문제연구소 (66) : 136-166, 2004

      23 허은, "독재화 근대화 격랑 속의 대학사회" 25 : 2006

      24 이형행, "대학정비 단행과 고등교육의 양적 관리(1961~’71)" 51 : 1991

      25 중앙교육연구소, "대학교육내용에 관한 종합적 연구: 대학 학생 지도에 관한 연구" 1967

      26 박대선, "대학과 국가발전" 교육출판사 1968

      27 대학신문사, "대학·자유·지성"

      28 노엄 촘스키, "냉전과 대학" 당대 2001

      29 "교육평론"

      30 강명숙, "고등교육 위상의 역사적 변화" 역사문제연구소 (67) : 102-122, 2004

      31 고대신문사, "고대신문사설선"

      32 馬越徹, "경제개발과 고등교육계획, In 한국 근대대학의 성립과 전개" 교육과학사 2001

      33 黑羽亮一, "戰後大學政策の展開" 玉川大學出版部 2001

      34 김건우, "1964년의 담론 지형 :반공주의, 민족주의, 민주주의, 자유주의, 성장주의" 대중서사학회 (22) : 71-90, 2009

      35 이상록, "1960-70년대 비판적 지식인들의 근대화 인식" 18 :

      36 김정인, "1950년대 대학교육과 미국식 학문 기반의 형성" 춘천교대 28 (28): 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.66 0.66 0.71
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.65 0.62 1.675 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼