RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    자연과 율법 = Nature and Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82542553

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    ??This paper seeks to highlight nature and law at the forefront of theology. The gradually increasing interest on today's environmental crisis is settling academically into the studies of ecology or bionomy. As Korean theology, indigenous theology and Minjung theology have been providing until now theological introspection on traditional culture and social reality. Now, the theology of life will be able to bring new results to Korean theology by focusing on nature and future. 'Nature and law' is a blotted name from the distrust and negligence in the history of theology of Protestantism. It has been pushed back as the object to overcome of 'revelation' or 'the Gospel'. However, the meaning of existence and value of nature and law was never denied and could not be denied. If environment and life have become highlighted as important subjects in this era, now is the time in which a new theological deliberation on nature and law is needed.<br/>
    ??To theologically treat nature and law, it is to confirm the legitimacy of their existence and right. It is to stand the both before creation in the same way. It can be said that what is needed for such composition of discussion is so-called 'the sense of balance based on the theory of justification'. The things to discuss and examine through 'the sense of balance based on the theory of justification' are as follow: the discussions on from what meaning nature and law became opened to creation, what are their limitations, how they can recover their independent theological rights and such assertion for recovering their rights will ultimately bring for the result of accepting, expanding and intensifying the traditional theory of justification. The things that are dealt prior to such discussions are as follow: the legitimacy of posing question with the theme of nature and law, concept provision of nature and law through the analysis of the origin of word and its theological relevance and the consideration on similarity and difference of the recent ecological interest and Reformation theology in light of this theological relevance.
    번역하기

    ??This paper seeks to highlight nature and law at the forefront of theology. The gradually increasing interest on today's environmental crisis is settling academically into the studies of ecology or bionomy. As Korean theology, indigenous theology and...

    ??This paper seeks to highlight nature and law at the forefront of theology. The gradually increasing interest on today's environmental crisis is settling academically into the studies of ecology or bionomy. As Korean theology, indigenous theology and Minjung theology have been providing until now theological introspection on traditional culture and social reality. Now, the theology of life will be able to bring new results to Korean theology by focusing on nature and future. 'Nature and law' is a blotted name from the distrust and negligence in the history of theology of Protestantism. It has been pushed back as the object to overcome of 'revelation' or 'the Gospel'. However, the meaning of existence and value of nature and law was never denied and could not be denied. If environment and life have become highlighted as important subjects in this era, now is the time in which a new theological deliberation on nature and law is needed.<br/>
    ??To theologically treat nature and law, it is to confirm the legitimacy of their existence and right. It is to stand the both before creation in the same way. It can be said that what is needed for such composition of discussion is so-called 'the sense of balance based on the theory of justification'. The things to discuss and examine through 'the sense of balance based on the theory of justification' are as follow: the discussions on from what meaning nature and law became opened to creation, what are their limitations, how they can recover their independent theological rights and such assertion for recovering their rights will ultimately bring for the result of accepting, expanding and intensifying the traditional theory of justification. The things that are dealt prior to such discussions are as follow: the legitimacy of posing question with the theme of nature and law, concept provision of nature and law through the analysis of the origin of word and its theological relevance and the consideration on similarity and difference of the recent ecological interest and Reformation theology in light of this theological relevance.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    ??This paper seeks to highlight nature and law at the forefront of theology. The gradually increasing interest on today's environmental crisis is settling academically into the studies of ecology or bionomy. As Korean theology, indigenous theology and Minjung theology have been providing until now theological introspection on traditional culture and social reality. Now, the theology of life will be able to bring new results to Korean theology by focusing on nature and future. 'Nature and law' is a blotted name from the distrust and negligence in the history of theology of Protestantism. It has been pushed back as the object to overcome of 'revelation' or 'the Gospel'. However, the meaning of existence and value of nature and law was never denied and could not be denied. If environment and life have become highlighted as important subjects in this era, now is the time in which a new theological deliberation on nature and law is needed.<br/>
    ??To theologically treat nature and law, it is to confirm the legitimacy of their existence and right. It is to stand the both before creation in the same way. It can be said that what is needed for such composition of discussion is so-called 'the sense of balance based on the theory of justification'. The things to discuss and examine through 'the sense of balance based on the theory of justification' are as follow: the discussions on from what meaning nature and law became opened to creation, what are their limitations, how they can recover their independent theological rights and such assertion for recovering their rights will ultimately bring for the result of accepting, expanding and intensifying the traditional theory of justification. The things that are dealt prior to such discussions are as follow: the legitimacy of posing question with the theme of nature and law, concept provision of nature and law through the analysis of the origin of word and its theological relevance and the consideration on similarity and difference of the recent ecological interest and Reformation theology in light of this theological relevance.
    번역하기

    ??This paper seeks to highlight nature and law at the forefront of theology. The gradually increasing interest on today's environmental crisis is settling academically into the studies of ecology or bionomy. As Korean theology, indigenous theology and...

    ??This paper seeks to highlight nature and law at the forefront of theology. The gradually increasing interest on today's environmental crisis is settling academically into the studies of ecology or bionomy. As Korean theology, indigenous theology and Minjung theology have been providing until now theological introspection on traditional culture and social reality. Now, the theology of life will be able to bring new results to Korean theology by focusing on nature and future. 'Nature and law' is a blotted name from the distrust and negligence in the history of theology of Protestantism. It has been pushed back as the object to overcome of 'revelation' or 'the Gospel'. However, the meaning of existence and value of nature and law was never denied and could not be denied. If environment and life have become highlighted as important subjects in this era, now is the time in which a new theological deliberation on nature and law is needed.<br/>
    ??To theologically treat nature and law, it is to confirm the legitimacy of their existence and right. It is to stand the both before creation in the same way. It can be said that what is needed for such composition of discussion is so-called 'the sense of balance based on the theory of justification'. The things to discuss and examine through 'the sense of balance based on the theory of justification' are as follow: the discussions on from what meaning nature and law became opened to creation, what are their limitations, how they can recover their independent theological rights and such assertion for recovering their rights will ultimately bring for the result of accepting, expanding and intensifying the traditional theory of justification. The things that are dealt prior to such discussions are as follow: the legitimacy of posing question with the theme of nature and law, concept provision of nature and law through the analysis of the origin of word and its theological relevance and the consideration on similarity and difference of the recent ecological interest and Reformation theology in light of this theological relevance.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 자연과 율법의 공동과제
    • Ⅲ. 율법과 자연의 권리주장
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 자연과 율법의 공동과제
    • Ⅲ. 율법과 자연의 권리주장
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 황덕형, "포스트모던 시대에서 바르트 신학의 의미: 신학적 담론 가능성으로서의 바르트의 화해론" 6 : 2007

    2 몰트만, 위르겐, "창조안에 계신 하나님-생태학적 창조론" 한국신학연구소 1987

    3 버거, 피터, "지식형성의 사회학" 기린원 1989

    4 김균진, "자연환경에 대한 기독교 신학의 이해" 연세대학교출판부 2006

    5 판넨베르크, 볼프하르트, "인간이란 무엇인가" 성광문화사 1981

    6 멜랑히톤, 필립, "신학총론" 크리스챤다이제스트 2000

    7 천병석, "신학에서의 동·서문제" 8 : 2003

    8 쉬바이처, 에두아르트, "마태복음" 한국신학연구소 1986

    9 루츠, 울리히, "마태공동체의 예수 이야기" 대한기독교서회 2002

    10 루터, 마틴, "로마서 주석" 크리스챤다이제스트 2001

    1 황덕형, "포스트모던 시대에서 바르트 신학의 의미: 신학적 담론 가능성으로서의 바르트의 화해론" 6 : 2007

    2 몰트만, 위르겐, "창조안에 계신 하나님-생태학적 창조론" 한국신학연구소 1987

    3 버거, 피터, "지식형성의 사회학" 기린원 1989

    4 김균진, "자연환경에 대한 기독교 신학의 이해" 연세대학교출판부 2006

    5 판넨베르크, 볼프하르트, "인간이란 무엇인가" 성광문화사 1981

    6 멜랑히톤, 필립, "신학총론" 크리스챤다이제스트 2000

    7 천병석, "신학에서의 동·서문제" 8 : 2003

    8 쉬바이처, 에두아르트, "마태복음" 한국신학연구소 1986

    9 루츠, 울리히, "마태공동체의 예수 이야기" 대한기독교서회 2002

    10 루터, 마틴, "로마서 주석" 크리스챤다이제스트 2001

    11 Sauter, Gerhard, "Rechtfertigung als Grundbegriff evangelischer Theologie" Chr. Kaiser 1989

    12 Hartmut, Rosenau, "Natur" Walter de Gruyter 23 : 1994

    13 Luther, Martin, "Heidelberger Disputation. WA. Bd. 1" 350-374,

    14 Joest, Wilfried, "Gesetz und Freiheit: Das Problem des tertius usus legis bei Luther und neutestamentliche Parainesse" Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 169-176, 1956

    15 Luther, Martin, "Genesiskommentar. WA Bd. 42" 124-,

    16 Welker, Michael, "Erwartungssicherheit und Freiheit - Zur Neuformulierung der Lehre von Gesetz und Evangelium" 18 : 1985

    17 Welker, Michael, "Erbarmen und soziale Identität. in: Evangelische Kommentare 19" 1986

    18 Luther, Martin, "Disputatio de iustificatione.in: D. Martin Luthers Werke Kritische Gesamtausgabe Bd. 39/I" 83-,

    19 김충렬, "21세기와 동양철학. in:공자사상과 21세기" 동아일보사 1994

    20 틸리히, 폴, "19·20세기 프로테스탄트 사상사" 한국신학연구소 1984

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.34 0.34 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.36 0.33 0.816 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼