RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Efficiency comparisons of fish sampling gears for a lentic ecosystem health assessments in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103575406

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The key objective of this study was to analyze the sampling efficiency of various fish sampling gears for a lentic ecosystem health assessment. A fish survey for the lentic ecosystem health assessment model was sampled twice from 30 reservoirs during 2008e2012. During the study, fishes of 81 species comprising 53,792 individuals were sampled from 30 reservoirs. A comparison of sampling gears showed that casting nets were the best sampling gear with high species richness (69 species), whereas minnow traps were the worst gear with low richness (16 species). Fish sampling efficiency, based on the number of individual catch per unit effort, was best in fyke nets (28,028 individuals) and worst in minnow traps (352 individuals). When we compared trammel nets and kick nets versus fyke nets and casting nets, the former were useful in terms of the number of fish individuals but not in terms of the number of fish species.
    번역하기

    The key objective of this study was to analyze the sampling efficiency of various fish sampling gears for a lentic ecosystem health assessment. A fish survey for the lentic ecosystem health assessment model was sampled twice from 30 reservoirs during ...

    The key objective of this study was to analyze the sampling efficiency of various fish sampling gears for a lentic ecosystem health assessment. A fish survey for the lentic ecosystem health assessment model was sampled twice from 30 reservoirs during 2008e2012. During the study, fishes of 81 species comprising 53,792 individuals were sampled from 30 reservoirs. A comparison of sampling gears showed that casting nets were the best sampling gear with high species richness (69 species), whereas minnow traps were the worst gear with low richness (16 species). Fish sampling efficiency, based on the number of individual catch per unit effort, was best in fyke nets (28,028 individuals) and worst in minnow traps (352 individuals). When we compared trammel nets and kick nets versus fyke nets and casting nets, the former were useful in terms of the number of fish individuals but not in terms of the number of fish species.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Allen GH, "Waste disposal in the marine environment" Pergamon Press 448-511, 1960

    2 Drake MT, "Validation and application of a fish-based index of biotic integrity for small central Minnesota lakes" 25 : 1095-1111, 2005

    3 Larsen DP, "The role of sample surveys for monitoring the condition of the nation’s lakes" 32 : 101-134, 1994

    4 Goffaux V, "The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces" 34 : 77-86, 2005

    5 Cowx IG, "Stock Assessment in Inland Fisheries" Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science 495-506, 1996

    6 Bonar SA, "Standard sampling of inland fish : benefits, challenges, and a call for action" 27 : 10-16, 2002

    7 Bonar SA, "Standard methods for sampling North American freshwater fishes" American Fisheries Society 2009

    8 Jacks S, "Standard methods for sampling North American freshwater fishes" American Fisheries Society 217-222, 2009

    9 Rundle HD, "Spatial and temporal variation in littoral-zone fish communities : a new statistical approach" 53 : 2167-2176, 1996

    10 Baker B, "Signaling in plante microbe interactions" 276 : 726-733, 1997

    1 Allen GH, "Waste disposal in the marine environment" Pergamon Press 448-511, 1960

    2 Drake MT, "Validation and application of a fish-based index of biotic integrity for small central Minnesota lakes" 25 : 1095-1111, 2005

    3 Larsen DP, "The role of sample surveys for monitoring the condition of the nation’s lakes" 32 : 101-134, 1994

    4 Goffaux V, "The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces" 34 : 77-86, 2005

    5 Cowx IG, "Stock Assessment in Inland Fisheries" Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science 495-506, 1996

    6 Bonar SA, "Standard sampling of inland fish : benefits, challenges, and a call for action" 27 : 10-16, 2002

    7 Bonar SA, "Standard methods for sampling North American freshwater fishes" American Fisheries Society 2009

    8 Jacks S, "Standard methods for sampling North American freshwater fishes" American Fisheries Society 217-222, 2009

    9 Rundle HD, "Spatial and temporal variation in littoral-zone fish communities : a new statistical approach" 53 : 2167-2176, 1996

    10 Baker B, "Signaling in plante microbe interactions" 276 : 726-733, 1997

    11 Hinch SG, "Relative abundance of littoral fishes : biotic interactions, abiotic factors, and postglacial colonization" 72 : 1314-1324, 1991

    12 Barbour MT, "Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish" US EPA Office of Water 1999

    13 Jackson DA, "Qualitative and quantitative sampling of lake fish communities" 54 : 2807-2813, 1997

    14 Mandrak NE, "Postglacial dispersal of freshwater fishes into Ontario" 70 : 2247-2259, 1992

    15 Cao X, "Phosphate induced metal immobilization in a contaminated site" 122 : 19-28, 2003

    16 Tonn WM, "Patterns in the species composition and richness of fish assemblages in Northern Wisconsin Lakes" 63 : 1149-1166, 1982

    17 McCune B, "PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4.0" MjM Software 1999

    18 Jackson DA, "Null models and fish communities : evidence of nonrandom patterns" 139 : 930-943, 1992

    19 US EPA, "Lake and reservoir bioassessment and biocriteria" US EPA, Office of Water 1998

    20 Tonn WM, "Intercontinental comparisons of small-lake fish assemblages : the balance between local and regional processes" 136 : 345-375, 1990

    21 Werner EE, "Habitat partitioning in a freshwater fish community" 34 : 360-370, 1977

    22 Guillory V, "Ghost fishing by blue crab traps" 13 : 459-466, 1993

    23 Lee WO, "Freshwater fishes of Korea based on characteristics: illustrated book" Jisungsa 432-, 2006

    24 Kim IS, "Freshwater fishes of Korea" Kyohak Publishing Co 467-, 2002

    25 Murphy BR, "Fisheries techniques" American Fisheries Society 1996

    26 Jackson DA, "Fish and benthic invertebrates : community concordance and communityeenvironment relationships" 50 : 2641-2651, 1993

    27 Rahel FJ, "Factors structuring fish assemblages along a Bog Lake successional gradient" 65 : 1276-1289, 1984

    28 Hanson JM, "Empirical predictions of fish biomass and yield" 39 : 257-263, 1982

    29 EU, "Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy" European Parliament and Council of the European Union 72-, 2000

    30 Kennard MJ, "Development and application of a predictive model of freshwater fish assemblage composition to evaluate river health in eastern Australia" 572 : 33-57, 2006

    31 Gassner R, "Cranio-maxillofacial trauma : a 10 year review of 9, 543 cases with 21, 067 injuries" 31 : 51-61, 2003

    32 Olin M, "Comparison of gillnet and trawl in diurnal fish community sampling" 506-509 : 443-449, 2003

    33 Randall RG, "Comparison of a Habitat Productivity Index(HPI)and an Index of Biotic Integrity(IBI)for measuring the productive capacity of fish habitat in nearshore areas of the Great Lakes" 28 : 240-255, 2002

    34 Committee, "Committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance" Gee 1992

    35 Zar JH, "Biostatistical analysis" Prentice-Hall 663-, 1999

    36 Hocutt CH, "Biological monitoring of fish" Lexington Books, DC Heath and Co 416-, 1980

    37 Jackson DA, "Biogeographic associations in fish assemblages : local vs. regional processes" 70 : 1472-1484, 1989

    38 Hubert WH, "Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data" American Fisheries Society 279-325, 2007

    39 Weaver MJ, "Analyses for differentiating Littoral fish assemblages with catch data from multiple sampling gears" 122 : 1111-1119, 1993

    40 Minns CK, "An index of biotic integrity(IBI)for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lake’s areas of concern" 51 : 1804-1822, 1994

    41 Somers KM, "Alteration of lake fish communities in response to acid precipitation and heavy-metal loading near Wawa, Ontario" 41 : 20-29, 1984

    42 Ryder RA, "A method of estimating the potential fish production of northtemperate lakes" 94 : 214-218, 1965

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2016-08-01 등재 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0 0 0
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0 0 0 0.03
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼