RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      밀턴의 부조리:『리시다스』에 나타나는 언어적 모순과 모호성

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=G3770905

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Milton's Lycidas has been considered a poem with multiple themes and subjects in a multiple-narrator structure. The poem is also thought to have contradictions and ambiguities in its syntax, making it hard not only to identify the real speaker but also to clarify the relationships among Lycidas who is dead, the narrator who mourns, and the other characters such as Muses, Phoebus, or “the Pilot of the Galilean lake,” to name a few, who appear in various names throughout the poem. The study finds that these incoherences are something Milton intended in his poem to show us complexities of life and uncertainty of language. They only prove what the study calls Milton's immortal modernity. First, these pages analyze, though in a limited way with limited resources, the syntax of some poetic lines of Lycidas, and find that Milton's use of inversions in sentences is a tool to emphasize the transfer of the feelings among those involved in the mourning. So the poem shows the progress of the narrator's mind from the dead friend to himself, meditating upon his own life, still young but ambitious for the future. Second, therefore, the study shows the transcendence of the poem from a mere monody to meditation upon the speaker then to a religious poem, dealing with church corruption, resurrection, and various other subjects. Thus Milton's incoherences mean his superior sense of language; they provide multiple interpretations and linguistic ambiguities. This complexity is the very proof of his modernity.
      번역하기

      Milton's Lycidas has been considered a poem with multiple themes and subjects in a multiple-narrator structure. The poem is also thought to have contradictions and ambiguities in its syntax, making it hard not only to identify the real speaker but als...

      Milton's Lycidas has been considered a poem with multiple themes and subjects in a multiple-narrator structure. The poem is also thought to have contradictions and ambiguities in its syntax, making it hard not only to identify the real speaker but also to clarify the relationships among Lycidas who is dead, the narrator who mourns, and the other characters such as Muses, Phoebus, or “the Pilot of the Galilean lake,” to name a few, who appear in various names throughout the poem. The study finds that these incoherences are something Milton intended in his poem to show us complexities of life and uncertainty of language. They only prove what the study calls Milton's immortal modernity. First, these pages analyze, though in a limited way with limited resources, the syntax of some poetic lines of Lycidas, and find that Milton's use of inversions in sentences is a tool to emphasize the transfer of the feelings among those involved in the mourning. So the poem shows the progress of the narrator's mind from the dead friend to himself, meditating upon his own life, still young but ambitious for the future. Second, therefore, the study shows the transcendence of the poem from a mere monody to meditation upon the speaker then to a religious poem, dealing with church corruption, resurrection, and various other subjects. Thus Milton's incoherences mean his superior sense of language; they provide multiple interpretations and linguistic ambiguities. This complexity is the very proof of his modernity.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼