RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      Notes on Ellipsis and Movement Asymmetries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102700416

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Movement and ellipsis have common features in both conceptual and empirical grounds. Conceptually, both movement and ellipsis share an operation “delete” and contain copies lacking phonological elements under the standard minimalistic treatments. Empirically, certain categories seem to undergo both ellipsis and movement, and may be subject to similar conditions. However, some categories can undergo only movement, but other categories can undergo only ellipsis. This paper aims to show that conditions on movement and ellipsis are not reducible to a single principle, and are subject to independent licensing principles in UG. We propose two overarching licensing conditions on movement and ellipsis; (i) only functional categories can license the ellipsis of their complements, (ii) movable categories should be phases. Given these conditions, our proposal can explain ellipsis and movement asymmetries in English.
      번역하기

      Movement and ellipsis have common features in both conceptual and empirical grounds. Conceptually, both movement and ellipsis share an operation “delete” and contain copies lacking phonological elements under the standard minimalistic treatments. ...

      Movement and ellipsis have common features in both conceptual and empirical grounds. Conceptually, both movement and ellipsis share an operation “delete” and contain copies lacking phonological elements under the standard minimalistic treatments. Empirically, certain categories seem to undergo both ellipsis and movement, and may be subject to similar conditions. However, some categories can undergo only movement, but other categories can undergo only ellipsis. This paper aims to show that conditions on movement and ellipsis are not reducible to a single principle, and are subject to independent licensing principles in UG. We propose two overarching licensing conditions on movement and ellipsis; (i) only functional categories can license the ellipsis of their complements, (ii) movable categories should be phases. Given these conditions, our proposal can explain ellipsis and movement asymmetries in English.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lebeaux, David., "Where Does Binding Theory Apply?" MIT Press 2009

      2 Aelbrecht, Lobke, "VP-ellipsis is not licensed by VP-topicalization" 43 : 591-614, 2012

      3 Bošković, Željko., "Two notes on right node raising" University of Connecticut 13-24, 2004

      4 Radford, Andrew., "Transformational Grammar" Cambridge University Press 1988

      5 Bresnan, Joan, "The position of certain clause-particles in phrase structure" 5 : 614-619, 1974

      6 Ernst, Thomas., "The phrase structure of English negation" University of Delaware 1990

      7 Merchant, Jason., "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" Oxford University Press 2001

      8 Kennedy, Christopher, "The Jorge Hankamer WebFest" University of California 2000

      9 Johnson, Kyle., "The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory" 439-479, 2001

      10 An, Duk-Ho., "Syntax at the PF Interface: Prosodic Mapping, Linear Order, and Deletion" University of Connecticut 2007

      1 Lebeaux, David., "Where Does Binding Theory Apply?" MIT Press 2009

      2 Aelbrecht, Lobke, "VP-ellipsis is not licensed by VP-topicalization" 43 : 591-614, 2012

      3 Bošković, Željko., "Two notes on right node raising" University of Connecticut 13-24, 2004

      4 Radford, Andrew., "Transformational Grammar" Cambridge University Press 1988

      5 Bresnan, Joan, "The position of certain clause-particles in phrase structure" 5 : 614-619, 1974

      6 Ernst, Thomas., "The phrase structure of English negation" University of Delaware 1990

      7 Merchant, Jason., "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" Oxford University Press 2001

      8 Kennedy, Christopher, "The Jorge Hankamer WebFest" University of California 2000

      9 Johnson, Kyle., "The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory" 439-479, 2001

      10 An, Duk-Ho., "Syntax at the PF Interface: Prosodic Mapping, Linear Order, and Deletion" University of Connecticut 2007

      11 Wilder, Chris., "Studies on Universal Grammar" John Benjamins Publishing Company 59-107, 1997

      12 안희돈, "Some Notes on Two Types of Fragments in English" 한국영어학회 12 (12): 903-921, 2012

      13 Postal, Paul., "Skeptical linguistic Essays" Oxford University Press 2004

      14 Barros, Matthew, "Right Node Raising requires both ellipsis and multidominance" 2010

      15 Hartmann, Katharina, "Right Node Raising and Gapping: Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion" John Benjamins 2000

      16 Höhle, Tilman., "Representation and Derivation in the Theory of Grammar" Kluwer 139-197, 1991

      17 Huang, James, "Reconstruction and structure of VP" 24 : 103-138, 1993

      18 Citko, Barbara., "Phase Theory" Cambridge University Press 2014

      19 Lobeck, Anne., "Perspectives on Phrase Structure" Academic Press 1991

      20 Postal, Paul, "Parasitic gaps and the across-board phenomenon" 24 : 735-754, 1993

      21 Stowell, Tim., "Origins of Phrase Structure. Doctoral dissertation" MIT Cambridge 1981

      22 안희돈, "On the Absence of CP Ellipsis in English and Korean" 한국언어학회 34 (34): 267-281, 2009

      23 Maling, Joan, "On gapping and order of constituents" 3 : 101-108, 1972

      24 Postal, Paul., "On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications" MIT Press 1974

      25 Saito, Mamoru, "N’-deletion in Japanese" University of Connecticut 87-107, 1990

      26 Kim, Kwang-sup, "Movement paradoxes are not paradoxes" 121 : 1009-1041, 2011

      27 Aelbrecht, Lobke., "Movement or ellipsis: what’s the difference?!" 2011

      28 Grosz, Patrick., "Movement and agreement in Right Node Raising constructions" MIT 2009

      29 Ahn, Hee-Don., "Light Verbs, VP-movement, Negation, and Clausal Architecture in Korean and English" University of Wisconsin 1991

      30 Johnson, Kyle., "LCA+Alignment+RNR" 2007

      31 Morgan, Jerry., "Issues in Linguistics" University of Illinois Press 719-751, 1973

      32 Ginzberg, Jonathan, "Interrogative Investigations: the Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives" CSLI Publications 2000

      33 Chomsky, Noam., "Interfaces + Recursion = Language?" Mouton de Gruyter 1-29, 2007

      34 Lobeck, Anne., "Fragments: Studies in Ellipsis and Gapping" Oxford University Press 98-123, 1999

      35 Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis" 27 : 661-738, 2004

      36 Chomsky, Noam., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud" MIT Press 133-166, 2008

      37 하승완, "Elliptical Feature Agreement and MaxElide" 한국영어학학회 (27) : 115-131, 2009

      38 Lobeck, Anne., "Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification" Oxford University Press 1995

      39 Ha, Seungwan., "Ellipsis, Right Node Raising, and Across-the-Board Constructions" Boston University 2008

      40 Sag, Ivan., "Deletion and logical form. Doctoral dissertation" MIT Cambridge 1976

      41 Ross, John., "Constraints on Variables in Syntax" MIT Cambridge 1967

      42 Hudson, Richard, "Conjunction reduction, gapping and right node raising" 52 : 535-562, 1976

      43 Drummond, Alex, "A puzzle about P-stranding and a possible solution" 41 : 689-692, 2010

      44 Emonds, Joseph., "A Transformational Approach in English Syntax" Academic Press 1976

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-08-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국언어학회(대표:홍재성) -> 한국언어학회 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-08-16 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국언어학회(대표:임홍빈) -> 한국언어학회(대표:홍재성)
      영문명 : The Linguistic Society Of Korea -> The Linguistic Society of Korea
      KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-19 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Linguistics KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.71 0.71 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.67 0.6 1.198 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼