RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정책변동의 정책네트워크이론적 분석 = 그린벨트정책을 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76255103

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Lately many people become concerned with environmental issues. Along with this tendency, the paradigm of urban policies has changed from 'development' to 'sustainable development'. However, the Green Belt policy changed in adverse direction i.e. from 'preservation' to 'development-oriented'. Why the policy changed in this direction?
    The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes of the policy shift from the perspective of policy network. Most policy network studies have focused on processes within networks and have paid little attention to the conceptualization of policy outputs and the theoretical link between network type and policy outcomes. This article examines policy contexts, policy problems, actors within policy networks, their interrelationships, and the types of the Green-Belt policy network, which are divided into three periods, 1971-1987, 1988-1997, and 1998-2000. Then it examines how these factors influence the policy outcomes - policy paradigm, policy goals, and policy instruments. Finally, this article presents the advantages and policy implications of policy network theories.
    번역하기

    Lately many people become concerned with environmental issues. Along with this tendency, the paradigm of urban policies has changed from 'development' to 'sustainable development'. However, the Green Belt policy changed in adverse direction i.e. from ...

    Lately many people become concerned with environmental issues. Along with this tendency, the paradigm of urban policies has changed from 'development' to 'sustainable development'. However, the Green Belt policy changed in adverse direction i.e. from 'preservation' to 'development-oriented'. Why the policy changed in this direction?
    The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes of the policy shift from the perspective of policy network. Most policy network studies have focused on processes within networks and have paid little attention to the conceptualization of policy outputs and the theoretical link between network type and policy outcomes. This article examines policy contexts, policy problems, actors within policy networks, their interrelationships, and the types of the Green-Belt policy network, which are divided into three periods, 1971-1987, 1988-1997, and 1998-2000. Then it examines how these factors influence the policy outcomes - policy paradigm, policy goals, and policy instruments. Finally, this article presents the advantages and policy implications of policy network theories.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 분석모형의 설정
    • Ⅲ. 그린벨트정책 도입배경 및 변천과정
    • Ⅳ. 그린벨트정책의 변동요인 분석
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 함의
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 분석모형의 설정
    • Ⅲ. 그린벨트정책 도입배경 및 변천과정
    • Ⅳ. 그린벨트정책의 변동요인 분석
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 함의
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼