RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일반 논문 : 집단행동의 사회학: 자원동원 모델의 성과, 한계 및 전망 = Sociology of Collective Action: Evaluations and Perspectives on Resource Mobilization Theory

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75501294

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Political prejudice has been an principal obstacle to scientific research on social movements for a long time. By this reason, social movements stayed outside of any serious research object of social science field. With the emerging Resource Mobilization Theory in United States, and New Social Movement Theory in Europe in the seventies, social movements became interesting object of academical discussion. Initially based on Olson`s rational action model, and in pursuit of solving Olson`s paradox, Resource Mobilization Theory announce the rupture with Collective Behaviour Theory to construct his own theoretical frame and accumulate empirical studies. In the mid-eighties, Resource Mobilization Theory threw away narrowness of his model based uniquely on methodological individualism and calculative rationality to communicate New Social Movement, to rediscover a certain aspect of Collective Behaviour Theory, and to introduce Symbolic Interactionism. Which certainly enrage the horizon of research, but the problem of elaborating new theoretical frame capable of integrating diverse approaches rest still unsolved.
    번역하기

    Political prejudice has been an principal obstacle to scientific research on social movements for a long time. By this reason, social movements stayed outside of any serious research object of social science field. With the emerging Resource Mobilizat...

    Political prejudice has been an principal obstacle to scientific research on social movements for a long time. By this reason, social movements stayed outside of any serious research object of social science field. With the emerging Resource Mobilization Theory in United States, and New Social Movement Theory in Europe in the seventies, social movements became interesting object of academical discussion. Initially based on Olson`s rational action model, and in pursuit of solving Olson`s paradox, Resource Mobilization Theory announce the rupture with Collective Behaviour Theory to construct his own theoretical frame and accumulate empirical studies. In the mid-eighties, Resource Mobilization Theory threw away narrowness of his model based uniquely on methodological individualism and calculative rationality to communicate New Social Movement, to rediscover a certain aspect of Collective Behaviour Theory, and to introduce Symbolic Interactionism. Which certainly enrage the horizon of research, but the problem of elaborating new theoretical frame capable of integrating diverse approaches rest still unsolved.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼