식민주의 역사학 속의 일본과 중국 －이마니시 류(今西龍)의 任那日本府 및 樂浪ㆍ帶方에 관한 논의를 중심으로－ = Japanese and Chinese history in the Historiography of Colonialism －Focus on Imanishi Ryu(今西龍)’s Research about Japanese Ministry of Imna(任那日本府) and Lelang-Daifang Commandery(樂浪ㆍ帶方郡)－

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Most of the studies by Imanishi Ryu, one of the leading historians of the historiography of colonialism, were about ancient Korean history. And it is indisputable that his work advocated Japanese aggression and colonial rule to Korea. However, his studies were not only in the historical phase of Japan’s invasion to the continent in the early 20^th century, but also in the magnetic field of Japanese academia of history at that time. From this point of view, this paper examines how Imanishi’s research on the Japanese Ministry of Imna and Lelang-Daifang Commandery were linked to the explanation of ancient Japanese history.
Imanishi, who had investigated Korea before the colonial rule, believed it all the time that Korea and Japan had a “dominance-subordinance” relationship based on frequent “transportation” and that ancient Japan was more advanced than Samhan and Silla. What symbolized Japan’s dominance over ancient Korea was that it dominated the southern part of the Korean Peninsula. Even though no relics had not been found in several archaeological investigations, Imanishi’s belief in the Japanese ministry of Imna remained unwavering. In particular, he linked the rise and fall of Japanese power in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula with the development of the Japanese state. In other words, it was possible to conquer Silla by Empress Jingu after the Japanese government’s power was mature enough to affect Japan as a whole. This meant that by the time of the Empress Jingu’s reign, a state with unified power was established in ancient Japan. Based on these internal capabilities, it was explained that the Japanese power in the southern part of the Korean peninsula reached its heyday from conquering Silla by the Empress Jingu until the reign of Emperor Yūryaku. And Imanishi regarded the time when the Empress Jingu conquered Silla, based on the year adjustment, which adds 120 years to Nihon Shoki’s Calendar year, like Naka michiyo, as the middle of the 4^th century at the latest. This meant that in the 4^th century, a unified state that stretched its power to the whole of Japan emerged.
The reason Japan was able to make progress in this early period was because it adopted advanced Chinese culture early. Imanishi argued that both Korean and Japanese cultures originated from Chinese culture, and argued that ancient Japan was more advanced than Korea on the grounds that Japan adopted Chinese culture before Korea. After Korean Annexation of Japanese Imperialism, Japanese researchers linked the tomb clusters in Pyongyang with Lelang Commandery, and Imanishi discovered a decisive relic proving that Lelang Commandery was in Pyongyang. Since then, Imanishi replaced the exchanges between China and Japan with transport between Lelang Commandery and Japan, insisting that this exchange began around A.D. In addition, he said that China and Japan continued to maintain contact through Daifang Commandery until the middle of the 3^rd century. At the time, Japanese researchers agreed that the essence of Chinese culture was preserved in Lelang-Daifang Commandery, although they were located on the Korean Peninsula. And Imanishi was also one of these researchers. This also meant that the Chinese culture that Japan had embraced throughLelang-Daifang Commandery since around A.D. was the highest level at the time, and that this culture acceptance was an important nutrient for the development of Japan. Imanishi’s discussion about Lelang-Daifang Commandery was that Japan grew up to embrace Chinese culture since around A.D. and matured into a unified state in the 4^th century. In addition, he suggested that in the early 4^th century, while the Lelang -Daifang Commandery disappeared from the Korean peninsula, the three kingdoms were established, and in order to save the small states of Imna from the pressure of Silla and Baekje, Empress Jingu conquered Silla. As a result, Imanishi suggested that a new historical phase of East Asia surrounding the Korean Peninsula was developed after 4^th century.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 今西龍, "樂浪帶方に就きて" 41 : 1929

2 류시현, "한말 일제 초 한반도에 관한 지리적 인식 ―‘반도’ 논의를 중심으로―" 한국사연구회 (137) : 269-294, 2007

3 도면회, "조선총독부의 문화 정책과 한국사 구성 체계 -『 조선반도사』와 『조선사의 길잡이』를 중심으로 -" 역사학회 (222) : 67-97, 2014

4 신현승, "제국 지식인의 패러독스와 역사철학" 태학사 2015

5 정인성, "일제강점기의 낙랑고고학" 한국상고사학회 71 (71): 149-170, 2011

6 Stefan Tanaka, "일본 동양학의 구조" 문학과 지성사 2004

7 심희찬, "일본 근대역사학의 성립・발전과 ‘조선’의 위상- 실증주의 역사학의 궤적과 그 그림자" 인문과학연구소 (52) : 81-113, 2016

8 정준영, "이마니시 류(今西龍)의 조선사, 혹은 식민지 고대사에서 종속성 발견하기" 한국사회사학회 (115) : 163-196, 2017

9 주경미, "의도된 오독(誤讀) - 일제강점기 낙랑문양(樂浪文樣)의 창출" 미술사와 시각문화학회 (18) : 120-153, 2016

10 정상우, "식민지기 일본인 연구자들의 고대 한일관계사 연구 경향: 이마니시 류(今西龍)와 스에마쓰 야스카즈(末松保和)의 논의를 중심으로" 규장각한국학연구원 (87) : 395-428, 2019

11 하마시타, "동아시아 地政文化는 성립하는가? ―‘동양사’의 출현과 근대 일본" 대동문화연구원 (63) : 61-79, 2008

12 이영훈, "낙랑문화 연구의 현황과 과제 , 낙랑"

13 심희찬, "근대역사학과 식민주의 역사학의 거리 -이마니시 류今西龍가 구축한 조선의 歷史像-" 한국사학사학회 (28) : 277-320, 2013

14 오영찬, "근대 역사학과 낙랑군" 2016

15 關野貞, "韓紅葉" 度支部建築所 1909

16 정인성, "關野貞의 낙랑유적 조사 ？ 연구 재검토 - 일제강점기「古蹟調査」의 기억 1 -" 호남고고학회 24 : 139-156, 2006

17 那珂通世, "那珂通世遺書" 大日本図書株式會社 1915

18 今西龍, "百濟史硏究" 近澤書店 1934

19 津田左右吉, "浿水考" 2 (2): 1912

20 谷井濟一, "朝鮮平壤附近古蹟調査" 東京人類學會雜誌 26-295, 1910

21 谷井濟一, "朝鮮平壤附近に於る新たる發見せられた樂浪郡の遺蹟 上" 4 (4): 1914

22 今西龍, "朝鮮平壤郡大同江南の古墳" 25 (25): 1910

23 今西龍, "朝鮮史の栞" 近澤書店 1935

24 關野貞, "朝鮮古蹟調査略報告" 朝鮮總督府 1914

25 關野貞, "朝鮮に於ける樂浪帶方時代の遺蹟" 29 (29): 1914

26 今西龍, "日韓上代文化と其關係に就て(接前)" 32 : 1910

27 今西龍, "日韓上代文化と其關係に就て" 31 : 1910

28 今西龍, "日本と新羅との年代の比較に就て"

29 今西龍, "支那の帝國主義が及ぼせる日韓の關係" 290 : 1932

30 今西龍, "大同江南の古墳と樂浪王氏との關係" 2 (2): 1912

31 三品彰英, "増補日鮮神話傳說の硏究(三品彰英論文集 第4巻)" 平凡社 1972

32 李基白, "國史新論" 泰成社 1961

33 今西龍, "加羅疆域考(下)" 4 (4): 1919

34 今西龍, "加羅疆域考(上)" 4 (4): 1919

35 今西龍, "任那に就て" 1918 (1918): 1918

36 崔在錫, "今西龍의 韓國古代史論批判" 13 (13): 1987

37 地理志, "三國志" 魏書 倭人傳

38 鳥居龍藏, "ある老學徒の手記" 朝日新聞社 1953

39 정상우, "『朝鮮史』(조선사편수회 간행) 편찬과 만선사의 상관성 ―『朝鮮史』 제 3편을 중심으로" 만주학회 (24) : 51-88, 2017

40 오영찬, "‘낙랑칠기’ 연구와 식민지주의" 백제문화연구소 1 (1): 89-108, 2013

41 나가하라 게이지, "20세기 일본의 역사학" 삼천리 2011

42 정상우, "1910~1915년 조선총독부 촉탁(囑託)의 학술조사사업" 한국역사연구회 (68) : 237-271, 2008