Recently, land expropriation increases for the rational use of land and the balanced regional development. There was a conflict in “Redevelopment project of Yongdoo District 1, in Daejeon in 2002, because the compensation scheme was agreed between t...
Recently, land expropriation increases for the rational use of land and the balanced regional development. There was a conflict in “Redevelopment project of Yongdoo District 1, in Daejeon in 2002, because the compensation scheme was agreed between those who are expropriated and the developers. The compulsory execution by the Korean National Housing Corp that mobilized 350 service-people for tearing-down caused physical confrontation and casualties. And those who are expropriated held mass protest, sleeping in the tents, in front of Daejeon-Jungguchung for almost 500 days. Also, as known in The Yongsan District 4 Incident” in 2009, the conflict and the confrontation between the union members and the tenants, regarding thecompensation scheme lead to “Yongsan Disaster”, resulting in many casualties. Since the mass protests like these, some improvement of system have been made for the seamless progression of projects. However, there is still the possibility of potential conflicts about compensation. This research was conducted to investigate the conflicts regarding the compensation between those who are expropriated and the developers. Thus, this research analyzed the state of the compensation in Daejeon and the state of land expropriation and discovered the conflicting factors through the measurement of the satisfaction level about the compensation by the phase of the project, in order to improve the problems regarding the compensation system that appeared in the administrative works for the compensation. To derive the alternative policies, a path analysis was conducted and the satisfaction level was analyzed using AMOS(Analysis Moment Structure). As a result, with respect to the empirical implications, the satisfaction level of those who were expropriated was: △ preparation for projet: M = 3.99, △ project implementation: M = 3.76, compensation agreement = 3.55, respectively. The satisfaction level by gender was : Men: M = 3.66 and Women: M = 3.95. With t = 2.103, and p = .37, it was observed significantly within the level of significance of p <.05 level. With respect to the improvement schemes by the phase of project, the phase of preparation requires △training the experts specialized in the compensation, △alleviating the regulations on the rights to purchase the residual land and aggressive land purchase. The phase of implementation requires △the officially assessed land price should reflect the actual land price △ the establishment of fair compensation evaluation system. And the phase of compensation agreement requires △ faithful negotiation for the compensation and △ the preparation of the arbitration provisions regarding the compensation arising from the public works.