RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공사가 중단된 집합건물을 양수하여 완공한 경우 건물소유권의 취득시기 = The time of acquisition of the aggregate building ownership when the building is completed after has been transferred in the condition that the construction had been halted

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101824108

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The Supreme Court has judged that the assignee acquire originally the ownership of the whole aggregate building because can regard the whole completed building is recognized that the structure and shape of the completed building is equivalent the original design and the contents of the construction as a object of the ownership, when a transferor who is delivered the aggregate building that construction had been halted, kept constructing on the remaining portion and finally has completed the building that may be admitted the structure and shape of the completed building to be equal generally-accepted idea in the society to the contents of the construction permission(This judicial precedent(2004Da67691) is an object of present study). However, the former Supreme Court had judged that should not decide uniformly whether the building which is under construction treat as an independent immovables, considering the function and utility of the building and must judge whether it is independent immovables, but that the former owner of the building which is under construction must acquire the building ownership if can regard the building as an independent building when such a building is made up the pillars, roof and main walls at least. And the Supreme Court had not judged a matter that the structure and shape of the completed building is equivalent the origina1 design and the construction permission. On that score, the precedent of the object of study cause a matter of procedure by reason that the Supreme Court had judged by agreement of the part of the Supreme Court Justices despite to judge by agreement of the who1e because the one precedent is opposed to the other. And it should not approve the conclusion of the one, because, in case of the aggregate building, the former owner of the building which is under construction must acquire originally the building ownership, whatever the complete of the whole of building, if it is completed at least the main walls, pillars and roof of a household which is a object of partitioned ownership, when the household is constructed in the condition that may be distinguished from other households
    번역하기

    The Supreme Court has judged that the assignee acquire originally the ownership of the whole aggregate building because can regard the whole completed building is recognized that the structure and shape of the completed building is equivalent the orig...

    The Supreme Court has judged that the assignee acquire originally the ownership of the whole aggregate building because can regard the whole completed building is recognized that the structure and shape of the completed building is equivalent the original design and the contents of the construction as a object of the ownership, when a transferor who is delivered the aggregate building that construction had been halted, kept constructing on the remaining portion and finally has completed the building that may be admitted the structure and shape of the completed building to be equal generally-accepted idea in the society to the contents of the construction permission(This judicial precedent(2004Da67691) is an object of present study). However, the former Supreme Court had judged that should not decide uniformly whether the building which is under construction treat as an independent immovables, considering the function and utility of the building and must judge whether it is independent immovables, but that the former owner of the building which is under construction must acquire the building ownership if can regard the building as an independent building when such a building is made up the pillars, roof and main walls at least. And the Supreme Court had not judged a matter that the structure and shape of the completed building is equivalent the origina1 design and the construction permission. On that score, the precedent of the object of study cause a matter of procedure by reason that the Supreme Court had judged by agreement of the part of the Supreme Court Justices despite to judge by agreement of the who1e because the one precedent is opposed to the other. And it should not approve the conclusion of the one, because, in case of the aggregate building, the former owner of the building which is under construction must acquire originally the building ownership, whatever the complete of the whole of building, if it is completed at least the main walls, pillars and roof of a household which is a object of partitioned ownership, when the household is constructed in the condition that may be distinguished from other households

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.69 0.69 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.55 0.818 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼