The aims of this study are to present an efficient learning and a new direction of home economics by analysing the perception and the demand of home economics education in high school home economics teachers and students.
For this purpose, data were ...
The aims of this study are to present an efficient learning and a new direction of home economics by analysing the perception and the demand of home economics education in high school home economics teachers and students.
For this purpose, data were collected from home economics teachers, girl students and boy students that finished of unfinished home economics in high school have given answers to classified questionnaire. The statistics of perception in home economics are given in frequency, percentage, X2 verification and that of demand are given in T-test and ANOVA.
The major finding were as follows:
Teacher's satisfaction of the 6th home economics curriculum is low and there is a meaningful difference(p<.01) in according to teacher's career because of their unsatisfaction of 6th home economics curriculum in itself, the unpractical educational contents in home economics curriculum in itself, the unpractical educational contents in home economics and the huge learning contents resulted from the decrease of school hours and there is a meaningful difference(p<.05) in according to teacher's career.
Teacher's perception of the practical exercises is high and there is a meaningful difference(p<.01) in according to teacher's career. The measure of test standard is also reasonable by teacher's debares. But teachers are difficulty in performing the practical exercise and evaluation because of a lot of students. The difficulty in the practical exercise and running subject is the lack of understanding of educational administer and other subject is the lack of understanding of educational administer and other subject is the lack of understanding of educational administer and other subject teachers and there is a meaningful difference(p<.05) in according to teacher's career.
As the students have the traditional perception with stress on the technical side for the education of home economics is useful for their practical life. But the degrees of their thoughts are low and there is a meaningful difference of perception(p<.05) between teacher and student.
The perception towards the necessity of home economics education for boy student is high to students and teacher. Especially the perception towards the necessity of home economics education for boy student is high to teachers and girl students.
Among boy students, finished boy student's perceptions are higher than unfinished boy students's one. So there is a meaningful difference(p<.001) among the group.
In the field demand of home economic, the field demand of children's development is first and the field demand of clothing is the lowest.
There is a meaningful difference(p<.05) in the field of food life according to teacher's career. we can find the meaningful difference(p<.01) in the field of housing.
In the demand of home economics content, teacher's demand is family health and nutrition, the demand of girl student and finished boy student is pregnancy and birth, demand of unfinished boy student is the form of family and the planning of life.