국내 범죄예방 환경설계 인증제도 도입을 위한선진국의 사례와 건축물 기존인증제 비교분석연구 = Comparative Analysis of Building Certification System for Introducing Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Certification in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to provide base data for introducing an official and reliable certification system that determines whether crime prevention through environmental design is being applied appropriately and discriminately at the time of application in the field. The research method is as follows: first, improvement measures through the investigation and comparative analysis of existing regulations, procedures, incentives, and certification cases is derived. Then, an investigation and a comparative analysis is carries out of the assessment methods of certification systems in developed countries regarding crime prevention through environmental design. The following results were obtained: (1) a certification agency should be established in order to secure the public confidence and reliability of assessment procedures, methods, and results of the certification system, and acquisition of the certification should be able to provide business values to enterprises and reliability to consumers; and (2) in order to activate and institute the certification, differentiated incentives compared to the existing certification system should be provided. Most importantly, public confidence should be obtained through legal certification; and (3)Crime Prevention and Environmental Design (CPTED) certification should be a crime risk assessment, evaluation standard, evaluation agency, and crime prevention inspection agency, and it should be differentiated from crime risk assessment and crime prevention application level.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 범죄예방환경설계가 무분별하게 적용되는 것을 방지하고 적합하게 적용되었는지 판정해주는 인증제도 도입을 위한 기초자료를 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다.
연구방법은 기존인증제도의 규정, 절차, 평가방법, 인센티브, 인증사례등을 조사․비교분석하여 개선안을 도출하고 범죄예방환경설계 선진국의 인증제도의 평가방법을 조사․비교분석하였다.
다음과 같은 연구결과가 도출되었다.
1)인증제도는 인증평가절차, 평가방법, 평가결과에 대하여 신뢰성을 확보하기 위해서는 인증기관이 설립되어야 하며 인증취득이 사업성을 확보 할 수 있어야 한다.
2)인증제도의 활성화를 위해 기존의 인증제도에서 지원되는 인센티브와 차별화된 인센티브가 제공되어야한다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이유미, "범죄로부터의 안전성 평가 지표와 범죄불안감간의 상관성 분석에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 24 (24): 121-128, 2008

2 김삼열, "녹색건축물 인증제도의 인증평가 검증 시스템 구축에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 29 (29): 309-316, 2013

3 이성옥, "공동주택 친환경건축물인증 평가항목별 득점현황 및 분석" 대한건축학회 29 (29): 306-316, 2013

4 이경훈, "공동주택 범죄예방설계 평가모델 구축을 위한 가중치 설정에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 28 (28): 89-96, 2012

5 김연진, "거주후평가를 통한 국내 CTPED 인증 만족도 분석 연구" 한국셉테드학회 5 (5): 33-66, 2014

6 Yumi N., "Study on model anti-crime condominiums in OSAKA-Interviews to lessors of condominiums" 21 : 227-230, 2005

7 Supreme Prosecutor's Office Republic of Korea, "Crime report" Supreme Prosecutor's Office 2017

8 Armitage, R., "An evaluation of secured by design housing schemes throughout the west Yorkshire area" University of Huddersfield 1999

9 Shin, S. J., "An economic analysis study of incentive for the green building certification criteria (GBCC) of apartment building" 13 (13): 325-326, 2013

10 Presidential Commission on Architecture Policy, "A study on the appraisal technique and institutionalization method of green certified buildings" Korea Appraisal Board 2013

11 Kang, S. J., "A study on the application of crime prevention through environmental design in multi-family housings" 28 (28): 505-508, 2008